Blue Economy
THE 22-YEAR WAIT: A CHRONOLOGY OF BROKEN PROMISES
The Stalled Dream and What Hangs in the Balance
By Bode Animashaun, Nigeria Waterways Maritime Correspondent
2003: The Cabotage Act is enacted.
May 2004: The CVFF begins collecting contributions—a 2% surcharge on all cabotage-protected trade. Billions begin accumulating.
2010–2015: Maritime stakeholders grow restless. Public calls for the fund to be activated. Government cites “structural constraints.” No action.
2017–2018: A 2019 maritime industry analysis finds that Nigerian boat owners have lost billions due to government inaction on CVFF. National Assembly holds hearings. NIMASA drafts operational frameworks. Internal disputes over interest rates, fund structure, and eligibility criteria stall progress.
December 2022: The President approves CVFF disbursement. Five commercial banks are appointed as Primary Lending Institutions (PLIs):
- Union Bank
- Zenith Bank
- Polaris Bank
- United Bank for Africa (UBA)
- Jaiz Bank
What happened next? Silence. No disbursements.
April 2023: The National Assembly formally approves CVFF disbursement. Six shipping companies are recommended for funding.
What happened next? More silence. Disputes erupted over interest rates. The PLIs proposed 8.5%, but internal wrangling over fund administration stalled everything.
2023–2024: Maritime organizations—the Ship Owners Association of Nigeria (SOAN), the Chamber of Shipping, maritime law groups—issue repeated press releases, petitions, and warnings. A Federal High Court in Lagos orders NIMASA to disclose full details of CVFF accruals after shipowners question where the money went.
January 2026: Minister Adegboyega Oyetola launches a digital application portal. He pledges that disbursement will commence. NIMASA issues Marine Notices. The government promises “strict governance and transparency.”
It is the fourth formal announcement since 2022.
WHAT’S AT STAKE FOR WATER TRANSPORT USERS
For the average Nigerian depending on waterways for daily mobility, the CVFF delays have translated into tangible hardship.
When Nigerian boat owners cannot access capital, they cannot buy new vessels. When they cannot buy new vessels, they cannot enter markets or expand routes. When they cannot expand routes, foreign operators fill the gap through waivers or illegal operations. When foreign operators dominate, prices remain high and service remains poor.
The mathematics are simple:
- High fares: A passenger traveling between creeks in the Niger Delta might pay rates set without genuine local competition.
- Poor schedules: Routes lack sufficient capacity, forcing commuters to wait hours or accept overcrowded conditions.
- Safety risks: Without a robust domestic fleet, safety standards on local waterways remain weak.
- Limited economic opportunity: Communities dependent on water transport remain disconnected from regional trade.
If the CVFF finally works, the reverse should happen: Nigerian boat owners enter protected markets with new, financed vessels. Competition increases. Fares drop. Services improve. Safety standards rise.
But that is a massive if.
THE SKEPTICISM IS EARNED
Captain Obi’s skepticism is not paranoia. It is the reasonable response of someone who has watched four government announcements produce zero results.
Ask any maritime lawyer, shipowner, or maritime journalist covering the sector, and you will hear variations of the same concern:
Does this government actually intend to follow through, or is this another cycle of announcements designed to mollify the maritime lobby while maintaining the status quo?
The evidence for skepticism is substantial:
- A 22-year track record of inaction—the longest delays in African cabotage financing anywhere on the continent.
- Bureaucratic letharness—Multiple agencies (NIMASA, Finance Ministry, Commercial Banks) must align. Without sustained executive pressure, delays cascade.
- Political prioritization—Maritime development, while important, has never been a top budget priority relative to oil, roads, or power.
- Financing constraints—The 50% NIMASA subsidy requires government funds. If fiscal pressures hit (lower oil revenues, exchange rate crises), the fund could be starved of resources.
- Banker foot-dragging—The five PLIs agreed to participate in 2022 but have not demonstrated urgency in loan processing or competitive interest rates.
- Trust deficit—A 2021 court order demanding NIMASA disclose CVFF accruals signaled that boat owners did not trust the agency’s stewardship of the fund.
Still on CVFF:
CVFF: THE CRITICAL PERIOD AHEAD
THE LOAN THAT COULD CHANGE EVERYTHING—WHY BOAT OWNERS REMAIN SKEPTICAL
HOW THE CVFF APPLICATION AND DISBURSEMENT PROCESS WORKS
© waterwaysnews.ng | Part 2 of 4-Part Investigation
Lagos Deputy Speaker Throws Weight Behind 8th WISTA Africa Conference
By Samson Onoharigho | Waterways News
The Deputy Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Mojisola Lasbat Meranda, has pledged her support for the 8th WISTA Africa Regional Conference and confirmed she will personally attend the continental maritime event, billed to take place in Lagos later this month.
Meranda gave the commitment when she received a delegation of the Women’s International Shipping and Trading Association (WISTA) Nigeria, led by its President, Dr. Odunayo Ani, during a courtesy visit to her office. The visit formed part of WISTA Nigeria’s pre-conference stakeholder outreach, targeting key institutional and legislative voices ahead of the gathering expected to draw policymakers, maritime regulators, industry operators, development partners, academics and professionals from across Africa.
Ani formally invited the Deputy Speaker and women across Lagos State to participate in the conference, scheduled for June 25 and 26, 2026, at Eko Hotel and Suites, Victoria Island, Lagos. She said the event, themed “From Policy to Implementation: Women Advancing Africa’s Blue Economy through Sustainable Shipping, Trade and Energy Innovation,” would focus on translating high-level policy commitments into concrete, sector-wide action.
The WISTA Nigeria president underscored Lagos’s pivotal role in Africa’s maritime economy, arguing that the visible participation of women leaders from the state would lend significant weight to ongoing advocacy for broader female representation in maritime decision-making, innovation, and economic governance.
A group photograph of WISTA Nigeria delegation with the Lagos Deputy Speaker, during a courtesy visit last week
“The support and participation of women leaders in Lagos State will enrich discussions and help advance the drive for greater female representation and inclusion across Africa’s maritime and blue economy sectors,” Ani said.
She also called on the Lagos State House of Assembly to mobilise women across the state for the conference, describing it as a rare platform for shaping a more inclusive and equitable future for Africa’s blue economy.
Responding warmly, Meranda commended WISTA Nigeria’s consistent contributions to championing women in the maritime industry and reaffirmed her longstanding relationship with the association. She confirmed her attendance and pledged active support for initiatives geared toward widening women’s participation across the blue economy value chain.
Nigeria Watch
The 8th WISTA Africa Regional Conference arrives at a moment of heightened policy activity in Nigeria’s maritime sector — from ongoing cabotage reform conversations and the CVFF disbursement saga to the broader push to position Nigeria as the hub of Africa’s blue economy. That WISTA Nigeria chose Lagos as the host city is no accident: with the Apapa and Tin Can Island ports, the emerging Lekki Deep Seaport complex, and the administrative machinery of NIMASA and the NPA all concentrated in the commercial capital, Lagos remains the operational heartbeat of Nigeria’s shipping industry.
What stands out about this edition is the deliberate legislative buy-in. Securing the endorsement of the Lagos Deputy Speaker is not merely symbolic — it signals an attempt to build bridges between the maritime industry and the lawmaking architecture that ultimately shapes port governance, cabotage enforcement, and blue economy investment policy. For an industry that has long complained of regulatory fragmentation and legislative indifference, that kind of outreach matters.
The conference theme — moving from policy to implementation — also resonates sharply in the Nigerian context. Nigeria has no shortage of blue economy frameworks, maritime masterplans, and gender inclusion commitments on paper. The harder challenge, as industry stakeholders consistently note, is converting those documents into enforceable regulation, funded programmes, and genuine career pathways — particularly for women, who remain significantly underrepresented at the senior levels of Nigerian shipping, port management, and maritime trade.
Port operators, shipowners, freight forwarders and terminal managers attending the June 25–26 conference would do well to engage the implementation-focused sessions closely. The conversations there are likely to feed back into the policy pipeline affecting their operations.
Waterways News | Maritime & Blue Economy Reporting
Nigeria Projects Blue Economy Vision at Our Ocean Conference in Mombasa
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News Correspondent
Nigeria has stepped onto the global stage to assert its maritime ambitions, with the Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Sola Enikanolaiye, representing President Bola Tinubu at the Our Ocean Conference currently holding in Mombasa, Kenya.
The three-day summit, running from June 16 to 18, convenes heads of state, ministers, investors, environmental advocates, policymakers and civil society leaders to advance concrete solutions for protecting the world’s oceans while unlocking their economic potential. Since its founding in 2014, the conference has built a reputation as one of the world’s most outcome-driven environmental forums, with a strong record of converting pledges into verifiable action.
This year’s edition places Africa’s blue economy at the centre of deliberations, acknowledging its role in sustaining more than 50 million livelihoods across the continent’s 38 coastal nations. Key discussions are focused on persistent threats to marine ecosystems — illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing, plastic pollution, rising ocean temperatures and the urgent need for expanded marine protected areas.
Nigeria is expected to use the platform to articulate its position as West Africa’s foremost maritime nation, drawing attention to ongoing efforts to develop its blue economy framework, reinforce maritime security architecture in the Gulf of Guinea, and improve ocean health across its coastline and exclusive economic zone (EEZ). The delegation is also expected to advance engagement with international partners on mechanisms to scale up sustainable ocean-based industries and deepen regional cooperation frameworks.
The conference programme extends beyond diplomatic exchanges to include investment forums, a BlueTech exhibition, youth leadership tracks and specialised policy clinics designed to drive innovation in climate adaptation and sustainable ocean governance. Organisers expect the gathering to catalyse fresh inflows of public and private capital into marine conservation and sustainable fisheries management.
Nigeria Watch
Nigeria’s participation in the Our Ocean Conference comes at a moment when the country’s blue economy agenda is still more aspiration than architecture. While the Tinubu administration has spoken broadly of harnessing Nigeria’s vast ocean resources — from fisheries and aquaculture to offshore energy and maritime tourism — the policy frameworks and funding mechanisms needed to convert that vision into commercial reality remain largely underdeveloped.
For Nigeria’s port operators, terminal managers and shipping stakeholders, the Mombasa summit carries practical significance beyond the diplomatic optics. International ocean governance commitments increasingly intersect with commercial maritime operations: stricter IUU fishing enforcement, expanded marine protected zones and emerging blue carbon markets all have direct implications for how shipping lanes, offshore logistics corridors and coastal port infrastructure are managed.
Equally notable is the investment dimension. The Our Ocean Conference has historically generated significant financing pledges for ocean-related projects. Nigeria’s ability to attract a share of that capital — particularly for port decarbonisation, offshore wind development and blue infrastructure along the Lagos-Calabar coastal corridor — will depend on whether Abuja can present bankable project pipelines backed by credible regulatory frameworks, rather than broad thematic declarations.
NIMASA’s ongoing efforts to modernise Nigeria’s maritime regulatory environment and the NPA’s port expansion programme are relevant foundations, but without coordinated blue economy legislation and dedicated funding mechanisms, Nigeria risks being a spectator at forums that are reshaping the global maritime investment landscape.
The question Mombasa should sharpen for Nigerian policymakers is straightforward: will the country leave with commitments, or with capital?
Waterways News — Covering Nigeria’s Maritime and Blue Economy Sector
How Liberia Turn Its Flag into a Maritime Goldmine — But the Profits Keep Sailing Away
The world’s largest ship registry sits in a West African nation with a $670 per capita income. The ships are everywhere. The money, largely, is not.
By Oghenewoke Osaweren | Waterways News
In the high-pressure world of global shipping, few decisions carry as much financial weight as where a vessel is registered. And right now, more shipowners are making that decision in favour of Liberia than any other country on earth.
As of June 2026, the Liberia-flagged fleet stood at 307.3 million gross tonnage — making the Liberian International Ship and Corporate Registry (LISCR) the first registry in history to cross the 300 million GT threshold. It is the third consecutive year Liberia has held the title of the world’s largest shipping registry, widening its lead over its nearest rival by nearly 45 million gross tons.
The numbers are staggering. The Liberian Ship Registry now accounts for 17 percent of the global fleet, with 6,092 vessels flying its flag, and it represents 28 percent of global newbuilding gross tonnage — meaning more than one in four new ships entering the global fleet now does so under the Liberian colours.
But what pulls the world’s shipowners to a flag planted in one of West Africa’s most impoverished nations? And, critically, what is Liberia itself getting out of the arrangement?
THE MAGNET: WHAT SHIPOWNERS ARE REALLY BUYING
Established in 1948, the Liberian Registry has built its reputation on maritime safety, environmental standards, and administrative efficiency. Yet the hard commercial draw has always been simpler than that: cost reduction on a massive scale.
Shipowners choose Liberia’s open registry for lower taxes and reduced registration fees that can significantly slash operational costs, alongside the freedom to hire multinational crews at competitive wages — bypassing the higher labour costs imposed by national registries in Europe, Asia, or the Americas.
There are no crew nationality restrictions on Liberian vessels, and taxes are assessed at conservative rates based on net tonnage. For owners managing fleets of dozens of vessels, the cumulative savings run into tens of millions of dollars annually.
The registry is administered from Vienna, Virginia, with offices in New York, Hamburg, Hong Kong, London, Piraeus, Tokyo, Zurich, Singapore, and Monrovia, providing clients with 24-hour service. The bureaucratic friction that delays other registries simply does not exist here — a Liberian ship-owning corporation can typically be formed on the same working day instructions are received.
THE CHINA CARD
Beyond the traditional cost advantages, a newer and increasingly consequential incentive has emerged. Under a renewed maritime agreement with the People’s Republic of China, Liberian-flag vessels now enjoy preferential tonnage dues rates at Chinese ports, alongside expedited customs procedures and simplified port formalities — advantages that competing flags such as the Marshall Islands do not enjoy.
In a global shipping economy where China handles a dominant share of cargo, this diplomatic edge is no small commercial consideration.
LIBERIA’S GAIN — ON PAPER
Proponents of the arrangement argue that Liberia benefits meaningfully from the registry’s prestige and revenue. The Liberia Maritime Authority has described holding the world’s largest registry title as both an honour and a responsibility, with Commissioner Neto Zarzar Lighe Sr. pledging commitment to innovation and best practices expected of a Category ‘A’ member of the International Maritime Organisation’s Council.
The registry is reported to generate approximately 25 percent of Liberia’s national income — a figure that, if accurate, would represent a remarkable dependency on a single offshore arrangement. Liberian-flagged vessels also carry more than one-third of the oil imported into the United States, giving Liberia an invisible but powerful role in American energy supply chains.
THE UNCOMFORTABLE ARITHMETIC
But the glowing statistics mask a deeply troubling reality.
According to the Liberia Revenue Authority’s own records, the country received just US$12 million in maritime revenue in the 2019-2020 tax year from LISCR — amounting to only 2.75 percent of its total domestic revenue. More recent estimates place Liberia’s annual take from the registry at approximately $20 million.
Against a backdrop where Liberia’s total GDP stood at $4.75 billion in 2024, with a per capita income of just $670, the question becomes stark: who is really benefiting from the world’s most powerful shipping flag?
When over 130 countries representing 90 percent of global GDP came together in 2021 to agree a historic minimum corporate tax rate of 15 percent for multinationals, shipping alone was excluded — an arrangement that continues to shield the registry’s clients from the kind of global tax reform that would otherwise erode their savings.
The structural explanation is revealing. LISCR is a purpose-made limited liability company registered in Delaware and based in Virginia, with US nationals as exclusive investors under Liberian law — meaning the entity that manages the world’s largest shipping registry is legally and operationally American, not Liberian.
Even the United States Ambassador to Liberia has publicly acknowledged the gap, stating that “the revenue, jobs, and expertise generated by LISCR have the potential to benefit Liberia’s economy in nearly every sector” — while urging that maritime revenues be transparently incorporated into the national budget. The diplomatic phrasing barely conceals the implicit admission: the potential is there, but the delivery has fallen short.
A FLAG THAT FLIES EVERYWHERE, PROFITS THAT LAND NOWHERE NEAR MONROVIA
Liberian investigative voices have grown increasingly vocal, with local media questioning whether registry revenues are ending up in the pockets of a privileged few, including top officials and their political lawyers, rather than flowing into public coffers.
The ITF has long argued that the FOC system lets foreign shipowners use the Liberian flag to benefit from lax regulations and lower operating expenses, resulting in labour exploitation with little meaningful economic benefit returning to Liberia itself.
The paradox is stark enough to have earned a name in academic and policy circles. The downward drag that tax havens brought to government revenues worldwide was once commonly referred to as the “Liberian Problem.”
THE BIGGER PICTURE FOR AFRICA
For maritime-watchers across West Africa — and in Nigeria, where the inland waterways sector continues to seek investment and regulatory frameworks that actually serve national interests — the Liberian registry story carries a cautionary resonance.
A nation can sit at the centre of global maritime commerce, command the allegiance of 6,000 vessels flying its flag across every ocean, carry a third of America’s oil imports, and still struggle to translate that extraordinary leverage into domestic development. The ships sail. The registry grows. The flag waves on every sea.
The revenue, largely, waves goodbye with them.
waterwaysnews.ng covers rivers, coasts, creeks, and the full sweep of Nigeria’s blue economy.
Oil and Gas3 months agoTantita’s Pipeline Deal: $144m Contract, Rising Output, and the Questions that Deserve Answers
- MARITIME TRADE & SHIPPING3 months ago
World’s Largest Container Ship Sets New Maritime Record with 22,233 TEUs on Single Voyage
- Blue Economy4 months ago
Nigeria’s Coast Guard Bill: A Solution in Search of a Problem?
Pingback: HOW THE CVFF APPLICATION AND DISBURSEMENT PROCESS WORKS - Water Ways News
Pingback: CVFF: THE CRITICAL PERIOD AHEAD - Water Ways News