Maritime Security and Safety
Stakeholders Cry Out as Stowaways Adopt New Tactics, Navy Nabs Eight in Four Months
Stakeholders Cry Out as Stowaways Adopt New Tactics, Navy Nabs Eight in Four Months
Industry operators warn of rising financial and reputational costs as experts call for external vessel checks, SPOMO Act review
By Ighoyota Onaibre | Waterways News Reporter, Lagos
Maritime stakeholders have sounded a fresh alarm over the growing sophistication of stowaway operations in Nigerian waters, as the Nigerian Navy confirmed the interception of at least eight stowaways in separate operations between January and April 2026 — a trend that is drawing concern from shipping companies, legal experts, and port security authorities alike.
The arrests, disclosed through a series of naval press statements and media briefings, point to an escalating security challenge at Lagos anchorage and along Nigeria’s coastal corridors — one that operators say is increasingly difficult to contain using conventional onboard security protocols.
Eight Arrests, Three Incidents
Naval authorities — particularly the Commander of Nigerian Navy Ship (NNS) Beecroft, Commodore Aiwuyor Adams-Aliu — confirmed three distinct interceptions in the period under review.
In March 2026, naval operatives on routine patrol intercepted two stowaways concealed aboard a vessel off the Lagos coast. The suspects were handed over to relevant authorities for investigation.
In early April, three Ghanaian nationals were arrested after illegally boarding a Europe-bound vessel in Lagos — an incident that naval authorities said underscored the continued use of Nigerian ports as departure points for irregular migration to Europe.
Days later, in mid-April, three more stowaways were apprehended aboard the merchant vessel MSC Stella near the Lagos Fairway Buoy, again while attempting to travel unlawfully to Europe before being detected during security checks.
Commodore Adams-Aliu, addressing journalists at one of the briefings, reaffirmed the Navy’s commitment to securing Nigeria’s territorial waters and warned that stowaway attempts pose grave safety risks and constitute violations of international maritime regulations. Naval sources indicate the total number of interceptions in 2026 may exceed the eight independently verified cases.
Shipping Companies Bear the Brunt
The Shipping Association of Nigeria (SAN) Chairman, Mrs Boma Alabi, has raised concerns over the mounting operational and financial toll on shipping companies. Speaking at a recent stakeholders’ meeting in Lagos, Alabi noted that shipping agents continue to grapple with stowaways boarding vessels undetected, causing delays in vessel departures as investigations and disembarkation procedures are carried out.
She highlighted the compounding financial liabilities involved — including fines, diversion costs, additional crew management responsibilities, and reputational damage to Nigeria as a port of origin — and called for stronger, better-coordinated port security measures, improved inter-agency collaboration, and a clear responsibility framework that shields shipping companies from bearing liability for what are fundamentally security failures.
“Shipping companies are often held responsible for situations that are largely security-related and beyond their operational control,” Alabi stated.
The Rudder Problem: A Shift in Stowaway Tactics
Perhaps the most telling insight into the shifting nature of the stowaway threat came from a former President of the Nigerian Merchant Navy Officers and Water Transport Senior Staff Association (NMNOWTSSA), Engr. Matthew Alalade, who told Waterways News that the days of stowaways hiding inside vessels are largely over — and that the industry has not fully adapted to what has replaced it.
“You hardly find stowaways inside the vessel anymore because onboard security is tight. What we are seeing now is people coming through small boats and hanging on the rudder,” Alalade explained.
He advised that shipping companies and agents must now adopt proactive external inspection measures — including deploying speedboats to check vessel undersides before departure, particularly when ships are riding high on light loads, which makes rudder compartments more accessible.
Alalade also sought to clarify the legal framework governing stowaways discovered at sea, stressing that international maritime practice strictly prohibits any harm to stowaways.
“There is no right to throw anyone overboard. The standard procedure is to report to the next port and hand the person over to authorities,” he said.
He also raised concerns about the Suppression of Piracy and Other Maritime Offences (SPOMO) Act, suggesting that portions of the legislation may no longer be fit for purpose in addressing current stowaway tactics and calling for a legislative review to reflect present-day realities.
Legal Framework: No Room for Extrajudicial Action
Maritime lawyer and immediate past Chairman of the Institute of Chartered Ship Brokers (ICS), Dr Chris Ebare, reinforced the legal position on stowaway handling, emphasising that throwing stowaways overboard is a serious criminal offence under both Nigerian law and international maritime conventions.
“To the best of my knowledge, there is no law that permits a captain to throw a stowaway into the sea. Such actions would amount to a serious offence,” Ebare stated. “It is not a case of jungle justice. Maritime laws and international conventions are clear on how such situations should be handled.”
Ebare maintained that the SPOMO Act provides clear penalties for maritime offences, and that all stowaways must be handed over to the relevant authorities for lawful prosecution — not subjected to extrajudicial treatment. He added that while enforcement of maritime laws in Nigeria is ongoing, greater consistency and wider awareness remain essential to deter violations.
Nigeria Watch
The eight stowaway arrests recorded in Nigeria’s waters in just four months of 2026 are more than a security statistic — they represent a serious governance gap at the port-vessel interface that risks eroding Nigeria’s standing as a reliable maritime hub.
The emerging shift to rudder-compartment concealment signals that conventional onboard security measures, however tight, are no longer sufficient. Port security agencies — including the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA), NIMASA, and naval patrols — must now contend with threats that originate outside the vessel perimeter, in open water, before boarding ever occurs. This calls for a rethinking of pre-departure inspection protocols and a wider deployment of patrol assets at anchorage points and fairway approaches.
For NIMASA, which bears statutory responsibility for maritime safety and security under its enabling legislation, the rising stowaway trend also raises questions about the adequacy of Port State Control and vessel clearance procedures. The agency’s collaboration with NNS Beecroft and other naval formations will need to intensify if Nigeria is to close the loopholes currently being exploited.
The SAN’s call for a clear liability framework deserves urgent regulatory attention. Shipping lines — many of whom are foreign-flagged operators whose continued calls at Lagos are commercially discretionary — should not be penalised for systemic port security failures. A fairer responsibility matrix, backed by stronger agency coordination, is the foundation on which Nigeria’s port competitiveness ultimately rests.
Maritime Security and Safety
Shipping Lines Hail Security Gains as US Lifts 12-Year Condition of Entry on Nigerian Vessels
Shipping Lines Hail Security Gains as US Lifts 12-Year Condition of Entry on Nigerian Vessels
By Ighoyota Onaibre | Waterways News
International shipping lines operating in Nigeria have welcomed the United States Coast Guard’s (USCG) decision to remove the 12-year Condition of Entry (CoE) restriction on vessels arriving in the US from Nigerian ports, describing it as evidence of the country’s improved maritime security standing.
The CoE, in force since 2014, subjected vessels that had called at Nigerian ports within their previous five port calls to additional security checks and enhanced scrutiny before US entry. Its removal ends over a decade of extra costs, delays and paperwork for operators trading between Nigeria and the US.
Maersk’s Terminal Planning Lead for West Africa, Srijesh Subramanian, said the move would benefit both importers and exporters given the volume of Nigerian trade with the US, and would likely embolden shipping companies to expand their services. He read the decision as a signal that Nigeria now looks like a safer environment than previously perceived.
Ocean Network Express’s Nigeria Director, Stefan Pedersen, credited the outcome to NIMASA’s sustained work, though he noted ONE has no direct US sailings and so is not directly affected. He expects the removal of restrictions to still ease trade generally for lines that do run direct US services.
Pacific International Lines’ Managing Director, Ugo Opiah, framed the lifting as an image win: qualifying for US standards marks a country as a high-integrity player, and Nigeria’s decade-plus wait to clear the bar signals real improvement in maritime security compliance.
Mediterranean Shipping Company’s Vessel and Terminal Coordinator, Adesina Omoparuwa, said the restriction had forced MSC into trans-shipment routings rather than direct Nigeria–US calls, the same workaround the line uses for China, and that direct service should now become possible, opening opportunities for US-based businesses to trade directly through Nigerian ports.
Nigeria Watch
The CoE’s removal is the payoff of a process that has run since at least 2019, when the USCG first proposed a phased, bi-annual assessment track with NIMASA to bring Nigerian ports into full ISPS Code compliance. The agency conducted four full assessments of Nigeria’s port facilities and national maritime security framework between March 2024 and April 2026 before signing off.
Marine and Blue Economy Minister Dr Adegboyega Oyetola has called the lift a major milestone, crediting sustained collaboration between the Ministry, NIMASA, port and terminal operators and shipping lines. Washington has echoed that framing: in a letter dated August 26, 2026, US Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Frank Garcia congratulated Oyetola on the reform, tying it to Nigeria’s anti-terrorism and port-security compliance record.
For Nigeria’s port competitiveness push, running alongside the NPERA Act’s commencement and the deep seaport approvals at Badagry, Olokola, Ibom and Bakassi, the CoE exit removes one of the more persistent reputational drags on the sector: an active US security flag that shipping lines, insurers and freight forwarders had priced into Nigeria-bound trade for over a decade. Whether the savings in inspection time, insurance and freight cost are passed down to Nigerian shippers, or absorbed by the lines quoted here, is the next thing worth watching.
Two More Tankers Struck in Strait of Hormuz as Attack Count Hits Five in a Week
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News
Two more tankers have been hit while transiting the Strait of Hormuz, leaving two seafarers with minor injuries and pushing the number of reported attacks or security incidents against commercial vessels in the waterway to at least five since 16 September.
The UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) centre said an inbound tanker was struck by an unidentified projectile on Monday. Two crew members sustained minor injuries, but the vessel stayed under its own power and continued to its next port, with no environmental impact reported.
Hours later, UKMTO issued a second alert after an outbound LPG tanker reported being struck by debris from unknown projectiles. All crew were reported safe and the vessel also continued its voyage. Authorities are investigating both incidents, and UKMTO has not attributed either attack to a specific actor.
The two strikes build on a Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC) advisory covering three earlier attacks between 16 and 18 September, one of which saw a tanker’s hull breached by a projectile, sparking a fire. JMIC continues to rate the threat level in the strait as “severe,” citing a high likelihood of deliberate hostile action and pointing to a pattern of harassment by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps — drone overflights, surveillance of merchant vessels and VHF hailing, alongside the direct attacks.
Traffic through the chokepoint remains sharply depressed. Only 17 commodity vessels were visibly transiting over the weekend, down from 37 the week before and against a pre-war daily average of roughly 125. That figure excludes vessels sailing with their AIS transponders switched off, and JMIC notes a persistent gap between visible and actual traffic.
Nigeria Watch
For Nigerian maritime stakeholders, the Hormuz crisis is no longer a distant Gulf story. It is a cost line. Every fresh escalation feeds directly into the war-risk insurance premiums and freight rates that Nigerian importers, refiners and shipping agents ultimately absorb, since global tanker and container capacity pulled off the Hormuz route tightens supply elsewhere and pushes rates up across long-haul trades, including those serving West African ports.
The renewed attacks also sharpen the stakes around Nigeria’s push for a stronger voice at the IMO Council table and its broader blue-economy diplomacy under Minister Adegboyega Oyetola. A sustained Gulf disruption is exactly the kind of systemic shock that tests whether Nigeria’s seat translates into influence over how global shipping risk, insurance and rerouting decisions are made, rather than Nigeria simply absorbing the downstream cost.
Locally, the episode is a reminder of the layered nature of “maritime security” as a policy word: the Deep Blue Project and Gulf of Guinea security architecture address piracy and armed robbery close to home, but Nigeria’s ports and shippers remain exposed to security failures thousands of kilometres away in the Gulf.
Waterways News will continue tracking how the Hormuz situation feeds into freight cost pressure at Nigerian ports and NIMASA’s public messaging on the issue.
Navy Renews Call for Special Maritime Courts, But Nigeria’s Justice Gap Persists
By Raymond Gold
The Nigerian Navy has again pressed for the creation of dedicated courts to try maritime offences, arguing that Nigeria’s regular judicial process is too slow to match the pace at which security agencies are arresting suspects at sea.
The renewed push came last week in Lagos at the 4th Ehingbeti Blue Economy Hub, on a panel built around strengthening the regulatory and justice frameworks needed to secure Nigeria’s blue economy. The session drew senior officers from the Navy and Marine Police, alongside a retired flag officer and other maritime stakeholders.
Rear Admiral A. A. Mustapha, Flag Officer Commanding the Western Naval Command, represented on the panel by his Chief Staff Officer, Rear Admiral N. C. Ekwom, said Nigeria is working toward an integrated maritime security strategy that would fold the country’s various security agencies into one common operating picture. He pointed to the Navy’s Falcon Eye system and the Regional Maritime Awareness Capability System as the technological backbone of that effort, noting that artificial intelligence is increasingly being layered onto surveillance operations.
Mustapha’s team acknowledged a persistent integration problem: the Navy’s Maritime Command and Control Centre reserves roughly 15 seats for personnel from partner agencies, but most command centres nationwide still operate in isolation. He linked the gap to a wider unfamiliarity with the sector across government, describing it as “maritime blindness”, a failure, in his words, to recognise the maritime domain’s importance to national development.
It was retired Rear Admiral Olanrewaju Beckley, however, who delivered the panel’s sharpest message: that slow prosecutions, not weak detection, may be the Navy’s biggest handicap. Beckley ran through the familiar list of threats I including illegal fishing, illegal bunkering, kidnapping for ransom, illegal refineries, terrorism and smuggling, and said the Navy’s “detect, arrest and prosecute” model breaks down at the final stage. Suspects and their vessels can sit in detention for extended periods awaiting trial, he said, a delay that risks suspects walking free and undermines the deterrent effect of every arrest made at sea.
His prescription was the same one Nigerian naval officers have floated repeatedly over the past decade: dedicated maritime courts that could fast-track case determination and cut down on prolonged detention without trial. Beckley also called for heavier government investment in surveillance assets such as vessels, drones and manned aerial platforms, arguing that the size of Nigeria’s maritime estate demands a security budget to match.
Assistant Inspector-General of Police Okunade Ronke Nurat, represented by CSP Olalekan Faniyi, described the working relationship between the Marine Police and the Navy as cordial, with joint patrols proceeding without friction, though she conceded there was room for deeper collaboration. Other panellists urged that any security-first approach to the blue economy be matched with investment in the coastal and riverine communities that live alongside Nigeria’s waterways.
The session’s recommendations, taken together, called for tighter integration among maritime security agencies, wider surveillance deployment, closer Navy–Marine Police cooperation, more security-asset funding, specialised judicial mechanisms for maritime crimes, and stronger economic support for coastal communities.
Nigeria Watch
Beckley’s plea will sound familiar to anyone who has followed this file. The Navy has asked for special maritime courts under at least three different Chiefs of Naval Staff over the past decade — through a Senate committee proposal in 2016, a direct appeal from the naval leadership in 2021, and now this latest call in 2026 — with no legislation to show for it. NIMASA’s leadership has separately lobbied the judiciary through its annual Admiralty Law Seminar for Judges, seeking faster case turnaround for the same reason Beckley cited: arrests that don’t stick because prosecutions crawl.
What has changed since 2020 is the legal toolkit, not the court structure. The Suppression of Piracy and Other Maritime Offences (SPOMO) Act gave prosecutors their first dedicated piracy statute and produced Nigeria’s first SPOMO conviction at the Federal High Court in Port Harcourt. But SPOMO cases still route through the same generalist Federal High Court dockets — carrying admiralty, commercial and constitutional matters alongside maritime crime — that Beckley says are the bottleneck. A special court, as envisaged, would need enabling legislation the National Assembly has never passed, whatever the number of naval appeals for it.
For operators represented by cooperatives like WABOTAN and ATBOWATON, the stakes in this debate cut both ways. Faster maritime prosecutions would, in principle, mean faster resolution for the vessels and crews the Navy detains, a genuine grievance among small-scale operators who say their boats and livelihoods can be tied up in custody for months over infractions far short of piracy or oil theft.
But any push to tighten enforcement and expand naval surveillance across the inland and coastal waterways will also be watched closely by the same informal operators, who have long argued that security crackdowns too often catch legitimate local transporters in the same net cast for pirates and illegal bunkerers. Whether the next iteration of this proposal survives the National Assembly, or joins its predecessors as a recommendation without a bill, will say much about how seriously Abuja is treating the justice half of its blue economy ambitions.
Oil and Gas7 months agoTantita’s Pipeline Deal: $144m Contract, Rising Output, and the Questions that Deserve Answers
- MARITIME TRADE & SHIPPING7 months ago
World’s Largest Container Ship Sets New Maritime Record with 22,233 TEUs on Single Voyage
- Blue Economy7 months ago
Nigeria’s Coast Guard Bill: A Solution in Search of a Problem?
