Connect with us

Blue Economy

Customs Seals Tanker, Halts Unauthorised PMS Discharge at Tin Can Island Port

Published

on

Stay connected via Google News
Follow us for latest news and information on Nigeria water ways.
Add as preferred source on Google

Customs Seals Tanker, Halts Unauthorised PMS Discharge at Tin Can Island Port

By Emetena Ikuku | Waterways News Correspondent

The Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) Tin Can Island Port Command has moved to contain what it describes as a flagrant breach of port regulations, after the product tanker MT NY Maria reportedly discharged Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) at the MRS Terminal — locally known as Dantata Jetty — without the required Customs clearance and while the vessel remained under an active Customs seal.

In a statement signed by the Command’s Public Relations Officer, Oscar Ivara, the NCS pushed back against what it called misleading accounts of the incident circulating in the public domain, insisting its officers acted strictly within the powers conferred by the Nigeria Customs Service Act, 2023.

How the Incident Unfolded
According to the Command, officers from the Boarding and Rummaging Unit boarded the MT NY Maria on Saturday, May 23, 2026, immediately after the vessel arrived from the Dangote Refinery. The boarding was part of a routine documentation and compliance exercise. During the inspection, officers discovered the vessel lacked a mandatory Last Port Clearance from its port of origin — a fundamental documentation gap.

Advertisement

The vessel’s agent was given a two-day window to produce the missing document, while the vessel was officially sealed and placed under Customs control pending compliance.

The situation took a sharper turn when intelligence reaching the Command indicated that by Wednesday, May 27, the vessel had commenced discharge operations — despite the outstanding documentation, and in direct violation of the Customs seal still in force on the ship.

Obstruction Alleged During Enforcement
Officers who mobilised to the terminal to enforce compliance reportedly encountered resistance from security personnel at the facility. Despite the obstruction, Customs operatives gained access to the premises and ordered the ship master to halt the unauthorised discharge and report to the Enforcement Unit to make statements.

The vessel was subsequently resealed in line with standard enforcement procedures.
The Command was emphatic that the ship master was not arrested, but was invited solely to provide statements as part of an ongoing investigation into the circumstances of the incident and the alleged obstruction of officers.

Advertisement

Legal Basis for the Action
The NCS grounded its enforcement in multiple provisions of the Nigeria Customs Service Act, 2023. It cited Sections 30 to 35 covering Customs controls, vessel inspections, examination of goods and documentation verification. Under Section 31(2)(b), international seaports are designated Customs Control Zones, while Section 31(4) mandates that imported goods be unloaded, inspected, assessed and cleared exclusively under Customs supervision.

The discharge of PMS by MT NY Maria while under seal and without clearance was characterised as a breach of Sections 46 to 58 of the Act, which govern reporting obligations, declaration of goods, unloading procedures, and the release of goods under Customs control. Sections 212, 222, 223, 225 and 226 were further cited as giving officers explicit authority to enter premises, board and inspect vessels, patrol Customs areas, and detain ships where violations are established or reasonably suspected.

The NCS added that investigations into the obstruction encountered during the enforcement operation remain active.

Nigeria Watch
The MT NY Maria incident is one of the most pointed illustrations yet of the tensions embedded in Nigeria’s post-deregulation petroleum supply chain — particularly the Dangote Refinery corridor.

Advertisement

As the refinery ramps up domestic fuel supply, product tankers are making increasingly frequent coastal runs between Lekki and the Lagos port terminals. The volume and frequency of these movements are placing new strain on Customs compliance infrastructure, raising the question of whether documentation procedures have been scaled to match the pace of throughput. A vessel clearing Dangote Refinery — a domestic origin — may not trigger the same customs vigilance as an import vessel, yet the regulatory obligations are identical once the product moves into a Customs Control Zone.

The alleged decision to discharge while under an active Customs seal and without clearance — if borne out by the investigation — would represent a serious regulatory breach, and one that carries troubling implications for port order. If terminal operators or vessel principals calculate that enforcement actions can be outpaced or resisted with private security, the credibility of Customs’ regulatory role at the nation’s busiest petroleum terminals comes into question.

For the maritime industry, the key issues to watch are: whether the investigation extends to the terminal operator at the MRS facility; the outcome of the obstruction allegation, which, if substantiated, could carry criminal dimensions; and whether the NCS moves to strengthen documentation protocols for domestic refinery product movements — a gap this incident has thrown into sharp relief.

Waterways News | Port & Maritime Intelligence

Advertisement
Facebook Comments Box
Stay connected via Google News
Follow us for latest news and information on Nigeria water ways.
Add as preferred source on Google
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Blue Economy

Water Transport Operators Push For Recognition At The Table As FTAN Demands Tourism Policy Reforms

Published

on

Stay connected via Google News
Follow us for latest news and information on Nigeria water ways.
Add as preferred source on Google

Water Transport Operators Push For Recognition At The Table As FTAN Demands Tourism Policy Reforms

By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News

Nigeria’s tourism sector needs urgent policy reform, stronger collaboration and fresh investment to compete globally and water transport operators who are members of the Federation of Tourism Associations of Nigeria (FTAN) want that conversation to include the boats, ferries and waterway routes that move millions of Nigerians and could move even more tourists.

That was the underlying idea raised by Comrade Babatope Fajemirokun National President of Waterfront Boat Owners and Transporters Association of Nigeria (WABOTAN) represented by Chief Raymond Gold, National PRO of WABOTAN, at the ninth Nigeria Tourism Investors Forum and Exhibition (NTIFE), held over two days in Abuja under the theme “Tourism Transformation Through Collaboration, Policy Alignment and Investment.” The events took place between Thursday 30 to Friday 31 of July 2026. Waterfront Boat Owners and Transporters Association of Nigeria (WABOTAN), is a corporate member of FTAN

The forum drew policymakers, investors, tourism operators and development partners.

Advertisement

FTAN President Dr Aliyu Badaki used his welcome remarks to press the Federal Government to overhaul tourism-related laws and regulatory frameworks that he said breed duplication, institutional conflict and legal uncertainty for operators. He said the federation’s newly developed Tourism Transformation Mandate (TTM) is meant to unify every segment of the tourism value chain.

Babatope Fajemirokun, through Chief Gold emphasizes the fact that this value chain for Nigeria’s coastal cities, riverine communities and inland waterway corridors, runs directly through water transport.

Badaki argued that fragmented efforts and weak coordination have held back the sector for years, and called for regulation that enables rather than inhibits growth.

Minister of Art, Culture, Tourism and Creative Economy, Hannatu Musawa, who declared the forum open, described tourism as a strategic pillar for economic diversification. She said government cannot finance tourism transformation alone and that private capital must lead, with government’s role limited to creating an enabling environment for investors.

Advertisement

In his keynote address, Sen. Ibrahim Ida called for stronger collaboration among government, the private sector and host communities, saying tourism can generate jobs, foreign exchange and diversification if properly harnessed.

Panel sessions, moderated by Justina Ovat of Calabar Hospitality House Limited, featured Nigeria Tourism Development Authority (NTDA) Director-General Dr Ola Awakan, who called for policy consistency and investor-friendly incentives, and Dr Philip Maga of the National Institute for Hospitality and Tourism (NIHOTOUR), who flagged the need for stronger workforce training to close skills gaps across the hospitality industry.

Hospitality entrepreneur Lanre Balogun urged investors to prioritise disciplined, long-term planning.

Nigeria Watch
For Nigeria’s water transport sector, NTIFE’s reform push is not a side conversation. Rather, it is a direct stakeholder issue. FTAN’s corporate membership includes Waterfront Boat Owners and Transporters Association of Nigeria (WABOTAN) and the Association of Tourist Boat Operators and Water Transporters of Nigeria (ATBOWATON), both drawn from the ranks of operators who run the boats, ferries and water taxis that already serve Lagos’s creeks, the Niger Delta’s riverine towns and coastal leisure routes. Their presence inside FTAN means the federation’s demand for regulatory clarity and coordinated policy carries an inland-waterways and blue-economy dimension that goes beyond hotels and heritage sites.

Advertisement

That matters because water tourism sits at an awkward regulatory junction in Nigeria. A tourist boat operator answers not only to tourism authorities but potentially to NIWA, LASWA (in Lagos) and NIMASA on safety standards, and state government tourism boards, precisely the kind of overlapping jurisdiction Badaki described as breeding “duplication, institutional conflicts… and operational uncertainty.”

The 2026 Supreme Court ruling affirming NIWA’s regulatory authority over inland waterways nationwide, following the NIWA-LASWA jurisdictional dispute, is a live example of the kind of institutional friction FTAN’s Tourism Transformation Mandate is meant to resolve, at least on the tourism side.

Musawa’s call for private capital to lead tourism investment also lands squarely on water transport operators’ desks. Vessel acquisition, safety retrofitting, jetty infrastructure and life-jacket compliance all require capital that small-scale operators, including WABOTAN’s member-cooperative structure, have struggled to access, a gap that echoes the long-running CVFF disbursement failure in the cabotage shipping sector and underscores why financing bottlenecks are not unique to cargo and passenger shipping alone.

If FTAN’s push for policy alignment succeeds in drawing water transport formally into Nigeria’s tourism investment architecture, operators like WABOTAN and ATBOWATON could gain a stronger claim to inclusion in infrastructure programmes such as the Omi-Eko electric ferry project and LASWA’s ferry safety development initiatives, turning routine commuter water transport into a recognised leisure and tourism asset, not just a transportation afterthought.

Advertisement

For a sector accustomed to being regulated but rarely consulted, this call by Babatope Fajemirokun is a modest but meaningful call.

Facebook Comments Box
Stay connected via Google News
Follow us for latest news and information on Nigeria water ways.
Add as preferred source on Google
Continue Reading

Blue Economy

NIMASA Deepens Seafarer Welfare Push, Signs Off Renewed Mission to Seafarers Collaboration

Published

on

Stay connected via Google News
Follow us for latest news and information on Nigeria water ways.
Add as preferred source on Google

NIMASA Deepens Seafarer Welfare Push, Signs Off Renewed Mission to Seafarers Collaboration

By Ighoyota Onaibre | Waterways News

The Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) has restated its commitment to improving the welfare of Nigerian seafarers, pledging deeper collaboration with the Mission to Seafarers (MtS) as part of ongoing reforms in the sector.

The commitment came as the Director-General, Dr Dayo Mobereola, received a delegation from the Mission to Seafarers at the agency’s Lagos headquarters, led by the Chairman of MtS Lagos, Chief Adebayo Sarumi, alongside the Regional Director for Africa, Reverend Cedric Rautenbach.

Speaking on behalf of the DG, NIMASA’s Executive Director for Operations, Engr. Fatai Taiye Adeyemi, said the agency would continue tightening certification processes, expanding capacity development programmes, and strengthening welfare policies for seafarers both at sea and in port, in partnership with stakeholders such as the Mission to Seafarers.

Advertisement

Chief Sarumi commended NIMASA’s ongoing reforms and expressed confidence that closer collaboration would translate into tangible welfare gains for Nigerian maritime professionals. Reverend Rautenbach, for his part, clarified that while the Mission to Seafarers and Nigeria’s Port Welfare Committees pursue a shared objective which is the the wellbeing of seafarers. The two bodies operate on distinct, complementary mandates, making coordination between them essential to strengthening on-ground support at Nigerian ports.

The meeting covered decent working conditions, welfare service gaps, and areas of mutual collaboration. NIMASA said the engagement aligns with its obligations under the Maritime Labour Convention (MLC) 2006, and forms part of a broader push toward stronger regulatory oversight and stakeholder engagement on seafarer rights.

Nigeria Watch
Beyond the courtesy-visit optics, this meeting lands on a fault line that has dogged Nigerian seafarer welfare for years: fragmented institutional responsibility. NIMASA regulates and certifies; Port Welfare Committees are meant to deliver frontline services at berths; the Mission to Seafarers, a faith-based international NGO, fills gaps neither statutory body always reaches. These gaps are chaplaincy, shore leave support, emergency assistance, and advocacy for stranded or abandoned crew.

Rautenbach’s point about “distinct but complementary mandates” is worth pressing on, because in practice that distinction has often meant duplication in some areas and total absence in others.

Advertisement

Nigerian seafarers have long reported patchy access to welfare facilities at ports like Apapa, Tin Can Island, and Onne. Such reports include inconsistent internet access, poor rest facilities, and slow response to cases of wage default or abandonment by errant shipowners, issues MWUN has repeatedly raised in past CBA compliance disputes.

NIMASA’s MLC 2006 framing is the right one, but enforcement, not policy language, remains the industry’s persistent complaint. If this renewed MtS partnership is to mean more than another photo-op at headquarters, it should translate into a documented, port-by-port welfare service map: which ports have functioning seafarer centres, which Port Welfare Committees are actually active, and where the Mission to Seafarers’ Flying Angel network is present versus where seafarers are effectively on their own.

Nigerian crews calling at their own national ports deserve better than welfare support that depends on which NGO happens to be in town.

Facebook Comments Box
Stay connected via Google News
Follow us for latest news and information on Nigeria water ways.
Add as preferred source on Google
Continue Reading

Blue Economy

NIMASA Bets on Youths to Power Nigeria’s Blue Giant Ambitions

Published

on

Stay connected via Google News
Follow us for latest news and information on Nigeria water ways.
Add as preferred source on Google

NIMASA Bets on Youths to Power Nigeria’s Blue Giant Ambitions

By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News

The Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) has restated that the country’s push to become Africa’s “Blue Giant” will rise or fall on how well it equips young Nigerians for the blue economy, with the agency’s Director-General, Dr Dayo Mobereola, describing youth capacity-building as the engine room of the National Marine and Blue Economy Policy.

Mobereola made the point at the 10th Taiwo Afolabi Annual Maritime (TAAM) Lecture at the University of Lagos, where he was represented by NIMASA’s Director of Reforms Coordination and Blue Economy, Mrs Nneka Obianyor. He linked the agency’s youth agenda directly to President Bola Tinubu’s economic diversification drive, noting that the Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Adegboyega Oyetola, has directed NIMASA to prioritise skills development and job creation for young Nigerians in the sector.

Director-General of NIMASA, Dr. Dayo Mobereola

To back that up, Mobereola pointed to a cluster of NIMASA programmes already running: the long-standing Nigerian Seafarers Development Programme (NSDP), a newly launched Blue Economy Accelerator Initiative, skills acquisition centres spread across the six geopolitical zones, and the rollout of Institutes of Maritime Studies in select Nigerian universities. He framed these as deliberate interventions meant to build capacity, generate employment, and spur innovation among the country’s youth population.

Advertisement

Separately, NIMASA used the UNILAG engagement to go beyond ceremony, running an interactive session with doctoral and master’s students on shipping development, maritime logistics, cabotage implementation, and maritime labour regulation. The session was led by the agency’s Director of Cabotage Services, Ms Gloria Anyasodo, and was pitched as part of a broader effort to strengthen ties between academia and industry in tackling the maritime sector’s practical challenges.

Nigeria Watch
The optics are good; the test, as always, will be delivery. NIMASA has no shortage of youth-facing initiatives on paper. The NSDP has existed for years, skills centres have been announced before, and Institutes of Maritime Studies have been floated in past budget cycles. What’s new here is the Blue Economy Accelerator Initiative, and it arrives with the same vagueness that has dogged similar rollouts: no disclosed funding envelope, no timeline for the six geopolitical zone centres to be fully operational, and no public framework for how graduates of these programmes are absorbed into shipping, logistics, or cabotage jobs afterward.

That absorption question matters more than any lecture-hall soundbite. Nigeria’s maritime training pipeline, from MAN Oron to the seafarer certification backlog that this publication has tracked, already produces more qualified hands than the domestic fleet and port ecosystem can currently employ. This is a mismatch tied directly to the Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund’s decades-long disbursement failure and the slow pace of indigenous vessel acquisition. Training more youths without fixing that bottleneck simply shifts the frustration downstream, from unemployment to underemployment.

There’s also an accountability gap in how these announcements are made. They are usually made through a lecture delegation rather than a costed policy document. If NIMASA and the Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy are serious about youths driving the Blue Giant ambition, the next disclosure should include enrolment numbers, the accelerator’s funding source, and most critically, the placement data showing how many NSDP and skills-centre graduates have actually found sea-time or shore-based maritime employment. Until then, this remains a well-intentioned promise stacked on top of several older, still-unfulfilled promises.

Advertisement
Facebook Comments Box
Stay connected via Google News
Follow us for latest news and information on Nigeria water ways.
Add as preferred source on Google
Continue Reading

Trending