Featured
AFRICA MOVES TO PLUG MARITIME SKILLS GAP WITH PROPOSED REGIONAL MARITIME UNIVERSITY
AFRICA MOVES TO PLUG MARITIME SKILLS GAP WITH PROPOSED REGIONAL MARITIME UNIVERSITY
A feasibility study has laid out plans for a Regional Maritime University (RMU) to serve Eastern, Southern and Northern Africa, aimed at closing a widening shortage of certified maritime professionals across the region through stronger training, deeper research capacity and better access to compulsory sea-time.
The study, carried out by Professor Anish Hebbar, an Associate Professor at the World Maritime University (WMU), reviewed maritime education and training systems in member states of the Maritime Organization for Eastern, Southern and Northern Africa (MOESNA). It examined existing institutions, training capacity, infrastructure, regulatory compliance and industry demand to test whether a regional university is viable.
Presented to industry stakeholders for validation, the study envisions an institution capable of producing seafarers, marine engineers, port specialists and maritime policy professionals who can compete internationally, while boosting the region’s share of the global maritime labour market.
Despite the MOESNA region hosting roughly 731 universities and higher institutions overall, only 21 are recognised Maritime Education and Training (MET) centres. Kenya leads with 11, Tanzania has four, Ethiopia and Uganda have two apiece, while the Democratic Republic of Congo and Malawi have just one each. Botswana, Burundi and Zambia have none.
Even where MET institutions exist, the study found they are struggling to turn enrolment into certified, employable graduates. Limited access to mandatory sea-time, weak practical facilities and thin ties to shipping companies were identified as the main reasons students fail to complete certification. Of 26 maritime agencies and institutions surveyed, 84.6 percent said training infrastructure, particularly simulators, workshops and sea-time placements, needs significant upgrading to meet the practical training standards under the IMO’s STCW Convention.
The report argues that a shared regional university would let member states pool resources for costly assets such as simulators, training vessels and engineering labs that individual countries cannot afford alone, and recommends the RMU build long-term partnerships with shipping lines, port authorities and maritime administrations to lock in cadet placements and improve graduate employability.
The push comes against a global backdrop of officer shortages. BIMCO and the International Chamber of Shipping project a worldwide shortfall of 39,100 certified officers by 2026, even with a surplus of ratings. Researchers say Africa, where over 60 percent of the population is under 25, is well placed to help fill that gap, yet the continent supplies only about 4 percent of the world’s seafarers. Within MOESNA specifically, the region contributed just 4,947 seafarers in 2021, or 0.26 percent of global supply, with Tanzania accounting for nearly 90 percent of that figure while Kenya, despite having the most MET institutions, supplied only 185.
Higher-level maritime education is another weak point. Out of the 21 MET institutions, only five offer bachelor’s degrees, one offers a master’s, and none offers a doctoral programme, limiting research and the pipeline of future maritime educators. The proposed university would offer degree and postgraduate programmes alongside certification and specialised training in marine engineering, maritime law, port management, logistics, environmental protection, safety, digital technologies and the blue economy, with stakeholders pushing for added focus on AI, automation, green shipping, maritime cybersecurity and alternative fuels.
International recognition remains limited too. Only Kenya, Tanzania and Ethiopia sit on the IMO White List, and only Ethiopia is recognised by the European Maritime Safety Agency. The study argues a single regional university could harmonise standards and improve the mobility of African seafarers internationally.
Gender representation was flagged as another gap, with women making up about 23 percent of enrolment at selected African maritime institutions and roughly 1 percent of the global seafaring workforce. The study recommends scholarships, mentorship, affordable tuition and stronger welfare support to widen access for women and disadvantaged students.
Overall, the study concludes an RMU would strengthen training, research and regional harmonisation, but cautions its success will hinge on sustained political will, predictable funding, sound governance and durable industry partnerships to guarantee graduates the practical exposure they need for certification and jobs.
Nigeria Watch
Nigeria is not a MOESNA member, but the story lands close to home. The skills and sea-time crisis the study describes in Eastern, Southern and Northern Africa is, almost point for point, the same crisis Nigerian maritime training has wrestled with for years at the Maritime Academy of Nigeria (MAN), Oron. Crises such as inadequate simulators, thin industry linkages, and cadets who complete coursework but stall at the certification stage for want of guaranteed sea-time berths.
The MOESNA study’s core diagnosis, that no single country can afford the full suite of simulators, training vessels and labs needed to meet STCW practical standards, so nations must pool resources, is a direct echo of arguments Nigerian stakeholders have made about NIMASA’s Nigerian Seafarers Development Programme (NSDP) and the long-running push to secure guaranteed cadet berths with international shipping lines. It also reinforces a point Nigerian commentary has made repeatedly that certification without sea-time is a dead end, and no amount of classroom capacity fixes that on its own.
There is a regional-diplomacy angle too. As West Africa’s Maritime Organization for West and Central Africa (MOWCA) region watches ECOWAS states debate similar training and cabotage-financing gaps, the MOESNA initiative is a useful comparison for how a regional bloc can formalise shared training infrastructure rather than each country building parochial, underfunded institutions. Nigeria’s own Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund (CVFF) debate, where small operators struggle to raise capital for modern vessels, mirrors the MOESNA study’s finding that individual states cannot shoulder capital-intensive maritime infrastructure alone.
The gender and youth findings also resonate. With women accounting for a small share of enrolment and an even smaller share of the seafaring workforce globally, and with Nigeria’s own maritime training bodies facing similar underrepresentation, the MOESNA recommendations on scholarships and welfare support add to a growing continental case for deliberate inclusion policy in maritime education, one Nigerian regulators and training institutions would do well to track as they shape their own reform agendas.
NIMASA Bets on Youths to Power Nigeria’s Blue Giant Ambitions
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News
The Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) has restated that the country’s push to become Africa’s “Blue Giant” will rise or fall on how well it equips young Nigerians for the blue economy, with the agency’s Director-General, Dr Dayo Mobereola, describing youth capacity-building as the engine room of the National Marine and Blue Economy Policy.
Mobereola made the point at the 10th Taiwo Afolabi Annual Maritime (TAAM) Lecture at the University of Lagos, where he was represented by NIMASA’s Director of Reforms Coordination and Blue Economy, Mrs Nneka Obianyor. He linked the agency’s youth agenda directly to President Bola Tinubu’s economic diversification drive, noting that the Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Adegboyega Oyetola, has directed NIMASA to prioritise skills development and job creation for young Nigerians in the sector.
Director-General of NIMASA, Dr. Dayo Mobereola
To back that up, Mobereola pointed to a cluster of NIMASA programmes already running: the long-standing Nigerian Seafarers Development Programme (NSDP), a newly launched Blue Economy Accelerator Initiative, skills acquisition centres spread across the six geopolitical zones, and the rollout of Institutes of Maritime Studies in select Nigerian universities. He framed these as deliberate interventions meant to build capacity, generate employment, and spur innovation among the country’s youth population.
Separately, NIMASA used the UNILAG engagement to go beyond ceremony, running an interactive session with doctoral and master’s students on shipping development, maritime logistics, cabotage implementation, and maritime labour regulation. The session was led by the agency’s Director of Cabotage Services, Ms Gloria Anyasodo, and was pitched as part of a broader effort to strengthen ties between academia and industry in tackling the maritime sector’s practical challenges.
Nigeria Watch
The optics are good; the test, as always, will be delivery. NIMASA has no shortage of youth-facing initiatives on paper. The NSDP has existed for years, skills centres have been announced before, and Institutes of Maritime Studies have been floated in past budget cycles. What’s new here is the Blue Economy Accelerator Initiative, and it arrives with the same vagueness that has dogged similar rollouts: no disclosed funding envelope, no timeline for the six geopolitical zone centres to be fully operational, and no public framework for how graduates of these programmes are absorbed into shipping, logistics, or cabotage jobs afterward.
That absorption question matters more than any lecture-hall soundbite. Nigeria’s maritime training pipeline, from MAN Oron to the seafarer certification backlog that this publication has tracked, already produces more qualified hands than the domestic fleet and port ecosystem can currently employ. This is a mismatch tied directly to the Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund’s decades-long disbursement failure and the slow pace of indigenous vessel acquisition. Training more youths without fixing that bottleneck simply shifts the frustration downstream, from unemployment to underemployment.
There’s also an accountability gap in how these announcements are made. They are usually made through a lecture delegation rather than a costed policy document. If NIMASA and the Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy are serious about youths driving the Blue Giant ambition, the next disclosure should include enrolment numbers, the accelerator’s funding source, and most critically, the placement data showing how many NSDP and skills-centre graduates have actually found sea-time or shore-based maritime employment. Until then, this remains a well-intentioned promise stacked on top of several older, still-unfulfilled promises.
Drowning in Wealth: How Nigeria Turned a Water Fortune Into a National Liability
By Raymond Gold | Waterways News
Nigeria is a country naturally endowed with water. The lakes, rivers, lagoons, the tributaries within the delta, the entire coast line and many other water bodies. Nigeria is not a country lacking water. Nigeria is a country hemorrhaging water wealth, deliberately, repeatedly, and almost without shame.
The Niger. The Benue. The Cross River. The Niger Delta. The Atlantic coastline. This is not a modest endowment. This is the kind of natural inheritance that other nations would kill for and build empires on. Most countries handed rivers, deltas, and coastlines like these would construct entire economies around them. Food systems, transport corridors, tourism belts, fishing fleets, energy grids and many more. Nigeria built none of it. Nigeria imports fish in a country stitched together by rivers. Fish is one thing the rivers were built to give Nigeria for free.
And then the rains come, as they always do, and the same tired script plays out on cue. Communities vanish underwater. Homes, farmland, market stalls, entire neighborhoods, gone in a season. Families displaced, livelihoods erased, and somewhere in Abuja, a press statement goes out calling it a “natural disaster.” As if decades of unmanaged waterways, abandoned drainage infrastructure, and regulatory paralysis had absolutely nothing to do with it. As if the flooding were an act of God rather than the predictable outcome of a government that has spent generations looking away.
The part that actually hurt is that none of those had to happen. The potential was never in doubt. It has been sitting here all along, waiting, inside rivers this country has never bothered to properly manage.
The Benue-Niger confluence at Lokoja, Kogi state.
Food production: Waters capable of feeding this country several times over, left fallow while the food import bill climbs.
Water transport: Inland waterways that should be moving people and cargo at a fraction of road cost, still underused despite NIWA’s mandate and the billions loaded into the Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund.
Tourism: A coastline and riverine landscape other countries would package and sell as a premium destination, left to rot in obscurity.
Fishing: An entire industry hollowed out by pollution, oil spills, and institutional neglect.
Trade: River and coastal corridors that could anchor Nigeria’s leverage inside the AfCFTA arrangement, sitting idle instead.
Energy: Hydro and blue economy potential that the Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy has, so far, only managed to describe in speeches.
Let’s look at countries that have done their waters right. The Netherlands built an entire nation’s worth of infrastructure below sea level and turned water management into a global export industry. Vietnam clawed its economy back from the wreckage of war. Bangladesh, a country poorer than Nigeria, more flood-prone than Nigeria, turned water into the backbone of its economic survival strategy. Every one of these countries had less to work with than Nigeria does. Every one of them did more with it.
Meanwhile, Nigeria keeps bleeding wealth, year after year, in exactly the same places: floods that arrive on schedule and are met with the same shock each time. Pollution that goes unpoliced until a river is functionally dead, jetties and terminals commissioned with fanfare and then abandoned to rust and regulatory systems frozen in place while the world moves on.
The rivers were never the problem. They never asked to be mismanaged. The failure which has been total, sustained, and entirely avoidable, has been ours.
Nigeria Watch:
If you strip away the outrage, what remains is a management problem, not a natural one, and management problems have solutions. The NIWA-LASWA jurisdictional standoff needs to end, not to be repeated again and again in court filings while investment stalls on the water. The CVFF needs to reach the small operators actually moving people and goods on these rivers, not just the well-connected few who keep making headlines for the wrong reasons. Inland waterways safety needs to be treated as core infrastructure policy, funded and enforced before the next capsizing, not mourned after it. And the blue economy agenda coming out of the Ministry needs to start producing jetties, ferry routes, and functioning fish markets, not just another communiqué. Nigeria does not have a water problem. It has a governance problem wearing water as a disguise. Until that changes, the rivers will keep doing exactly what they have always done, and Nigeria will keep watching its own wealth wash out to sea, one flood season at a time.
Rising Ferry Fares Push Lagos Commuters Back to the Roads
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News
Commuters in Lagos are increasingly deserting inland water transportation in favour of road travel, as steep hikes in ferry fares make longer waterway routes an unaffordable option for many residents.
Passengers who spoke to Waterways News on Friday at the Marina Jetty in CMS said the rising cost of water transportation has discouraged patronage, particularly on extended routes such as CMS to Badagry and CMS to Ikorodu.
The Apapa–CMS route, they noted, still attracts strong ridership because it allows passengers to sidestep the chronic gridlock on the Marine Bridge. Even so, fares on that short crossing have climbed steadily, from N500 to N700, and now to N1,000.
Longer trips have been hit even harder. A one-way journey from CMS to Badagry now costs about N10,000, while commuters heading to Porto-Novo in neighbouring Benin Republic pay as much as N12,000.
Passengers say these fares far outstrip equivalent road fares, tilting the balance back toward road transport despite the traffic headaches it brings.
Responding to the concerns, the Chairman of the Lagos chapter of the Association of Tourist Boat Operators and Water Transporters of Nigeria (ATBOWATON), Comrade Saheed Lawal, attributed the fare increases to the soaring cost of petrol and rising spare parts prices. Lawal said fuel access remains a major operational bottleneck, with only one official boat fuelling point on Lagos waterways, situated at the Lagos State Waterways Authority (LASWA) headquarters in Falomo. He explained that a round trip from CMS to Falomo solely to refuel burns through roughly 10 litres of petrol, pushing many operators to instead buy fuel in jerrycans from filling stations around Marina, at a higher cost.
He said the combined pressure of expensive fuel, climbing maintenance costs, and limited refuelling infrastructure has left operators with little room to lower fares, a squeeze that is now translating into falling passenger numbers across the state’s waterway network.
Nigeria Watch
The fare crisis at CMS Jetty is a pointed illustration of a structural problem that has long trailed Lagos’s inland waterways sector, an operating environment that pushes costs onto commuters faster than it builds the infrastructure to contain them.
LASWA’s single official fuelling point at Falomo is a case in point. For an operator running the CMS–Badagry corridor, the detour to refuel adds fuel consumption, time, and wear before a single paying passenger boards. That an authority tasked with regulating and growing water transport has not scaled its own fuelling infrastructure to match ridership growth speaks to a broader pattern of the state investing in jetties and franchise routes while leaving the supporting logistics, fuel access chief among them, to catch up later, if at all.
The episode also sharpens the case for the Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund (CVFF) and similar financing windows to widen their reach beyond deep-sea cabotage vessels to inland and intra-city ferry operators. Boat owners citing spare parts costs and maintenance strain as drivers of fare increases are, in effect, describing a capital access problem — one that a functioning CVFF disbursement window, or a dedicated inland waterways financing facility, could directly address by lowering the cost of fleet renewal and upkeep.
There is also a safety dimension worth flagging. When fares push commuters off ferries and onto informal, unregulated road alternatives, or onto overloaded boats run by operators cutting corners to stay competitive, the result is rarely just an economic story, it becomes a safety one, feeding into the accident patterns NIWA and LASWA have struggled to contain on Lagos waterways in recent years.
For a state government positioning water transport as a serious pillar of Lagos’s transport mix and, by extension, Nigeria’s blue economy ambitions under the Federal Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy, the CMS Jetty fare complaints are a signal that affordability and fuel logistics need to be treated as core policy problems, not operator-level grievances to be managed informally.
Oil and Gas5 months agoTantita’s Pipeline Deal: $144m Contract, Rising Output, and the Questions that Deserve Answers
- MARITIME TRADE & SHIPPING5 months ago
World’s Largest Container Ship Sets New Maritime Record with 22,233 TEUs on Single Voyage
- Blue Economy6 months ago
Nigeria’s Coast Guard Bill: A Solution in Search of a Problem?
