Blue Economy
Fact-Check: NIWA’s 70% Boat Accident Reduction Claim
Summary:
This article reveals that while NIWA has achieved genuine progress (30% reduction saving ~100 lives annually), the 70% claim is 2.4 times overstated due to methodological flaws. The visualization chart breaks down exactly how the numbers were manipulated and what the verified reality shows.
By Bode Animashaun
The National Inland Waterways Authority (NIWA) recently received the Maritime Agency of the Year 2025 award from New Telegraph newspaper, celebrated for achieving a remarkable 70% reduction in boat mishaps across Nigeria’s inland waterways. Acting Managing Director Alhaji Umar Yusuf Girei accepted the honor at the Lagos Oriental Hotel, Victoria Island, dedicating it to the agency’s staff and former Managing Director Bola Oyebamiji.
While NIWA’s safety initiatives deserve recognition, a detailed examination of the underlying data reveals significant methodological flaws that call the 70% figure into serious question. This fact-check investigation separates genuine achievement from statistical manipulation.
DISPUTE AREAS
#1: Comparing Incomplete Years to Full Years
The Claim: NIWA reported a 72% reduction in boat accident fatalities (rounded to 70% for public communication).
The Methodology: NIWA compared 330 deaths from the 2021-2022 baseline period against 92 deaths recorded between January and August 2025.
Why This Is Problematic:
The fundamental flaw lies in comparing eight months of data against a full-year average. This is statistically invalid and creates a misleading impression of progress. The calculation essentially measures: (330 – 92) ÷ 330 = 72% reduction.
However, this approach assumes that boat accidents occur evenly throughout the year—a demonstrably false assumption. Historical data shows that October through December experiences the highest incident rates due to:
- Seasonal flooding that increases water traffic
- Year-end festival travel creating overcrowding
- Reduced visibility during harmattan weather conditions
- Increased commercial boat activity as farmers transport harvests
By cutting off the comparison in August, NIWA’s calculation excludes the most dangerous quarter of the year, artificially inflating the reduction percentage.
The Reality Check: When comparing complete years—2021-2022 average (330 deaths) versus the most recent complete year of 2024 (231 deaths)—the verified reduction is 30%, not 70%.
#2: Ignoring Immediate Contradictory Data
The Timeline Problem:
Shortly after NIWA announced its 72% reduction claim in August 2025, a catastrophic boat accident occurred in September 2025, killing 60 people in a single incident. This tragedy:
- Raised the 2025 death toll from 92 to 152 within weeks of the award announcement
- Immediately reduced the claimed 72% reduction to approximately 54%
- Demonstrated the danger of making statistical claims based on incomplete data
Why This Matters:
The September accident wasn’t an aberration—it fits the historical pattern of late-year incidents. NIWA’s methodology essentially predicted that boat accidents would stop occurring for the remainder of 2025, an assumption contradicted by both historical trends and immediate events.
If the year-end pattern holds (and September’s tragedy suggests it will), 2025 is on track to record approximately 231 deaths—nearly identical to 2024’s figures and representing a 0% improvement year-over-year, despite the claimed 70% reduction.
#3: Selective Baseline Manipulation
The Baseline Question:
NIWA chose to use a 2021-2022 average as its baseline rather than the immediately preceding year (2024). While averaging multiple years can provide stability, in this context it serves to maximize the appearance of reduction.
The Alternative Interpretation:
If NIWA had compared 2025 performance against 2024 (the most recent complete year), even using their flawed partial-year methodology, the reduction would appear much smaller. Using January-August 2024 data against January-August 2025 would likely show minimal change, undermining the award narrative.
By reaching back to 2021-2022, when boat accident deaths were at their peak, NIWA created the largest possible gap between baseline and current performance—a classic technique for inflating improvement statistics.
Conflating Partial Success with Complete Victory
What NIWA Actually Achieved:
The agency has implemented legitimate safety reforms:
- April 2024: Launched the Inland Waterways Transportation Code establishing mandatory safety standards
- 2023-2025: Deployed 15 specialized boats including surveillance vessels, enforcement craft, and water ambulances
- 2025: Conducted safety campaigns across 300+ riverine communities
- Ongoing: Stationed Water Marshals at major embarkation points to enforce life jacket requirements and loading limits
- August 2025: Successfully rescued 104 passengers from the Kainji Lake capsizing incident
These initiatives have contributed to a genuine 30% reduction in annual fatalities from 2021-2022 levels to 2024—a significant public health achievement that saves approximately 100 lives per year.
Why the Exaggeration Matters:
By claiming 70% instead of the verified 30%, NIWA creates several problems:
- False Complacency: Believing the problem is 70% solved may reduce urgency for continued reforms
- Budgetary Vulnerability: Politicians may argue that an agency achieving 70% success needs less funding, not more
- Credibility Damage: When the full-year 2025 data emerges showing results far below 70%, NIWA’s reputation for honest reporting will suffer
- Undermines Real Achievement: The genuine 30% reduction represents lives saved and deserves accurate recognition—exaggeration cheapens legitimate progress
The Political Context: Why Numbers Get Inflated
The Award Incentive Structure:
The New Telegraph award ceremony creates institutional pressure for impressive statistics. Agencies competing for “Maritime Agency of the Year” face temptation to present data in the most favorable light possible. A 30% reduction, while commendable, doesn’t generate headlines or trophies the way 70% does.
The Career Advancement Factor:
Acting Managing Director Girei may seek confirmation as permanent MD. Presenting dramatic success metrics strengthens his case for permanent appointment. Similarly, staff members seeking promotions benefit from association with “award-winning” performance.
The Budget Justification Cycle:
Nigerian government agencies face annual budget battles. An agency demonstrating 70% reduction in its core problem area can argue for:
- Expanded mandate to other waterways
- Increased personnel allocations
- Capital expenditure for additional boats and equipment
- International recognition and donor funding
A more modest 30% reduction, while still positive, carries less budgetary leverage.
What Independent Verification Shows
Verified 2024 Full-Year Data:
- Total boat accident deaths: 231
- Reduction from 2021-2022 baseline (330): 99 deaths
- Percentage improvement: 30%
Projected 2025 Full-Year Data (Based on January-September):
- Deaths through September: 152 (including the 60-person September tragedy)
- Historical October-December average: ~79 additional deaths
- Projected year-end total: ~231 deaths
- Projected reduction from baseline: 30% (identical to 2024)
The Pattern:
NIWA achieved a genuine 30% reduction between 2021-2022 and 2024, and has maintained that level of performance into 2025. This represents stabilization at a new, safer baseline—a legitimate achievement. However, there is no evidence of the continued dramatic improvement the 70% figure implies.
Why the 30% Reduction Still Matters
Lives Saved:
A 30% reduction translates to approximately 100 fewer deaths annually compared to the 2021-2022 baseline. These are real people—fishermen, traders, students, families—who returned home safely because NIWA’s reforms worked.
Behavioral Change:
The deployment of Water Marshals and enforcement of safety codes has shifted operator behavior. Boat captains now face consequences for:
- Operating without sufficient life jackets
- Exceeding passenger capacity
- Traveling at night without proper lighting
- Launching from unauthorized, unsafe embarkation points
Infrastructure Development:
NIWA’s 15-boat fleet provides:
- Regular patrol presence deterring unsafe practices
- Rapid response capability for emergencies (as demonstrated in the Kainji Lake rescue)
- Visible government commitment to waterway safety
Community Engagement:
The 300+ communities reached through safety campaigns now have:
- Greater awareness of drowning prevention
- Understanding of their rights to refuse overloaded boats
- Knowledge of how to report unsafe operators
These achievements represent genuine institutional reform that should be celebrated accurately rather than exaggerated politically.
The Methodological Standard NIWA Should Have Used
Proper Comparison Framework:
- Annual Comparisons Only: Compare full year 2024 (231 deaths) to full year 2021-2022 average (330 deaths) = 30% verified reduction
- Quarterly Trend Analysis: Report January-August 2025 data (92 deaths) as preliminary figures requiring year-end confirmation, not as final achievement metrics
- Multi-Year Rolling Averages: Use three-year rolling averages to smooth out anomalies while still capturing trends
- Incident Rate per Journey: Calculate deaths per 100,000 passenger journeys to account for increased water traffic, providing context for absolute numbers
- Regional Breakdown: Separate statistics for Lagos lagoons, Niger River, Benue River, and Niger Delta to identify where reforms are working versus where additional focus is needed
The Path Forward: From Statistics to Lives
What NIWA Must Do to Maintain Credibility:
- Issue a Correction: Publicly acknowledge that the 70% figure was based on incomplete 2025 data and provide the verified 30% reduction when comparing complete years
- Commit to Transparency: Publish monthly accident statistics on NIWA’s website, including incident details, locations, and contributing factors
- Set Realistic Targets: Establish a goal of 50% reduction by 2027 through sustained enforcement and infrastructure expansion—an ambitious but achievable target
- Independent Verification: Partner with academic institutions or international maritime organizations to conduct third-party audits of accident data
- Focus on Remaining 70%: The 231 deaths recorded in 2024 represent 231 preventable tragedies. NIWA should treat these not as “acceptable losses” but as urgent imperatives for continued reform
What the Media Must Do:
Journalists covering the maritime sector should:
- Request full-year data before reporting reduction percentages
- Compare year-to-year figures using consistent methodologies
- Follow up on mid-year claims when annual data becomes available
- Hold agencies accountable for statistical accuracy, not just impressive-sounding numbers
What Citizens Should Demand:
Riverine communities and water transport users should:
- Insist on continued Water Marshal presence at embarkation points
- Report operators who violate safety codes
- Refuse to board overloaded or unsafe vessels, regardless of inconvenience
- Demand that budget allocations for NIWA increase to match its expanded safety mandate
Data Summary Table
| Metric | NIWA’s Claim | Verified Reality | Discrepancy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline Period | 2021-22 avg: 330 deaths | 2021-22 avg: 330 deaths | ✓ Accurate |
| Comparison Data | Jan-Aug 2025: 92 deaths | Full Year 2024: 231 deaths | ✗ Incomplete year used |
| Reduction Claimed | 72% (≈70%) | 30% (complete years) | ✗ 2.4x overstatement |
| 2025 Projection | ~92 deaths (implied) | ~231 deaths (likely) | ✗ 2.5x underestimate |
| Lives Saved Annually | ~238 (vs baseline) | ~99 (vs baseline) | ✗ 2.4x overstatement |
Verdict:
NIWA’s 70% reduction claim is methodologically flawed and substantially overstated. The verified reduction based on complete annual data is 30%—still a significant achievement, but less than half the claimed figure.
Conclusion: The Difference Between Progress and Public Relations
NIWA has achieved real, measurable progress in reducing boat accident deaths. The 30% reduction from 2021-2022 to 2024 represents lives saved, families kept whole, and communities made safer. This is worthy of recognition and should serve as a foundation for continued improvement.
However, by inflating that achievement to 70% through methodologically flawed comparisons, NIWA has transformed a genuine success story into a credibility problem. When the full 2025 data emerges—likely showing results closer to 2024’s 231 deaths rather than the 92 implied by the mid-year claim—the agency will face uncomfortable questions about whether its award was based on substance or spin.
The true test of NIWA’s commitment to water transport safety isn’t whether it can manipulate statistics to win awards, but whether it can sustain and build upon the genuine 30% reduction already achieved. That requires honest reporting, continued investment in enforcement, and an institutional culture that values lives saved over trophies earned.
The 231 Nigerians who will likely die in boat accidents in 2025—down from 330 in 2021-2022—represent both NIWA’s achievement and its unfinished work. They deserve an agency committed to truth in reporting as much as to safety in practice.
Supporting Visualization: See attached data verification chart for graphical representation of these findings.
Lagos Deputy Speaker Throws Weight Behind 8th WISTA Africa Conference
By Samson Onoharigho | Waterways News
The Deputy Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Mojisola Lasbat Meranda, has pledged her support for the 8th WISTA Africa Regional Conference and confirmed she will personally attend the continental maritime event, billed to take place in Lagos later this month.
Meranda gave the commitment when she received a delegation of the Women’s International Shipping and Trading Association (WISTA) Nigeria, led by its President, Dr. Odunayo Ani, during a courtesy visit to her office. The visit formed part of WISTA Nigeria’s pre-conference stakeholder outreach, targeting key institutional and legislative voices ahead of the gathering expected to draw policymakers, maritime regulators, industry operators, development partners, academics and professionals from across Africa.
Ani formally invited the Deputy Speaker and women across Lagos State to participate in the conference, scheduled for June 25 and 26, 2026, at Eko Hotel and Suites, Victoria Island, Lagos. She said the event, themed “From Policy to Implementation: Women Advancing Africa’s Blue Economy through Sustainable Shipping, Trade and Energy Innovation,” would focus on translating high-level policy commitments into concrete, sector-wide action.
The WISTA Nigeria president underscored Lagos’s pivotal role in Africa’s maritime economy, arguing that the visible participation of women leaders from the state would lend significant weight to ongoing advocacy for broader female representation in maritime decision-making, innovation, and economic governance.
A group photograph of WISTA Nigeria delegation with the Lagos Deputy Speaker, during a courtesy visit last week
“The support and participation of women leaders in Lagos State will enrich discussions and help advance the drive for greater female representation and inclusion across Africa’s maritime and blue economy sectors,” Ani said.
She also called on the Lagos State House of Assembly to mobilise women across the state for the conference, describing it as a rare platform for shaping a more inclusive and equitable future for Africa’s blue economy.
Responding warmly, Meranda commended WISTA Nigeria’s consistent contributions to championing women in the maritime industry and reaffirmed her longstanding relationship with the association. She confirmed her attendance and pledged active support for initiatives geared toward widening women’s participation across the blue economy value chain.
Nigeria Watch
The 8th WISTA Africa Regional Conference arrives at a moment of heightened policy activity in Nigeria’s maritime sector — from ongoing cabotage reform conversations and the CVFF disbursement saga to the broader push to position Nigeria as the hub of Africa’s blue economy. That WISTA Nigeria chose Lagos as the host city is no accident: with the Apapa and Tin Can Island ports, the emerging Lekki Deep Seaport complex, and the administrative machinery of NIMASA and the NPA all concentrated in the commercial capital, Lagos remains the operational heartbeat of Nigeria’s shipping industry.
What stands out about this edition is the deliberate legislative buy-in. Securing the endorsement of the Lagos Deputy Speaker is not merely symbolic — it signals an attempt to build bridges between the maritime industry and the lawmaking architecture that ultimately shapes port governance, cabotage enforcement, and blue economy investment policy. For an industry that has long complained of regulatory fragmentation and legislative indifference, that kind of outreach matters.
The conference theme — moving from policy to implementation — also resonates sharply in the Nigerian context. Nigeria has no shortage of blue economy frameworks, maritime masterplans, and gender inclusion commitments on paper. The harder challenge, as industry stakeholders consistently note, is converting those documents into enforceable regulation, funded programmes, and genuine career pathways — particularly for women, who remain significantly underrepresented at the senior levels of Nigerian shipping, port management, and maritime trade.
Port operators, shipowners, freight forwarders and terminal managers attending the June 25–26 conference would do well to engage the implementation-focused sessions closely. The conversations there are likely to feed back into the policy pipeline affecting their operations.
Waterways News | Maritime & Blue Economy Reporting
Nigeria Projects Blue Economy Vision at Our Ocean Conference in Mombasa
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News Correspondent
Nigeria has stepped onto the global stage to assert its maritime ambitions, with the Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Sola Enikanolaiye, representing President Bola Tinubu at the Our Ocean Conference currently holding in Mombasa, Kenya.
The three-day summit, running from June 16 to 18, convenes heads of state, ministers, investors, environmental advocates, policymakers and civil society leaders to advance concrete solutions for protecting the world’s oceans while unlocking their economic potential. Since its founding in 2014, the conference has built a reputation as one of the world’s most outcome-driven environmental forums, with a strong record of converting pledges into verifiable action.
This year’s edition places Africa’s blue economy at the centre of deliberations, acknowledging its role in sustaining more than 50 million livelihoods across the continent’s 38 coastal nations. Key discussions are focused on persistent threats to marine ecosystems — illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing, plastic pollution, rising ocean temperatures and the urgent need for expanded marine protected areas.
Nigeria is expected to use the platform to articulate its position as West Africa’s foremost maritime nation, drawing attention to ongoing efforts to develop its blue economy framework, reinforce maritime security architecture in the Gulf of Guinea, and improve ocean health across its coastline and exclusive economic zone (EEZ). The delegation is also expected to advance engagement with international partners on mechanisms to scale up sustainable ocean-based industries and deepen regional cooperation frameworks.
The conference programme extends beyond diplomatic exchanges to include investment forums, a BlueTech exhibition, youth leadership tracks and specialised policy clinics designed to drive innovation in climate adaptation and sustainable ocean governance. Organisers expect the gathering to catalyse fresh inflows of public and private capital into marine conservation and sustainable fisheries management.
Nigeria Watch
Nigeria’s participation in the Our Ocean Conference comes at a moment when the country’s blue economy agenda is still more aspiration than architecture. While the Tinubu administration has spoken broadly of harnessing Nigeria’s vast ocean resources — from fisheries and aquaculture to offshore energy and maritime tourism — the policy frameworks and funding mechanisms needed to convert that vision into commercial reality remain largely underdeveloped.
For Nigeria’s port operators, terminal managers and shipping stakeholders, the Mombasa summit carries practical significance beyond the diplomatic optics. International ocean governance commitments increasingly intersect with commercial maritime operations: stricter IUU fishing enforcement, expanded marine protected zones and emerging blue carbon markets all have direct implications for how shipping lanes, offshore logistics corridors and coastal port infrastructure are managed.
Equally notable is the investment dimension. The Our Ocean Conference has historically generated significant financing pledges for ocean-related projects. Nigeria’s ability to attract a share of that capital — particularly for port decarbonisation, offshore wind development and blue infrastructure along the Lagos-Calabar coastal corridor — will depend on whether Abuja can present bankable project pipelines backed by credible regulatory frameworks, rather than broad thematic declarations.
NIMASA’s ongoing efforts to modernise Nigeria’s maritime regulatory environment and the NPA’s port expansion programme are relevant foundations, but without coordinated blue economy legislation and dedicated funding mechanisms, Nigeria risks being a spectator at forums that are reshaping the global maritime investment landscape.
The question Mombasa should sharpen for Nigerian policymakers is straightforward: will the country leave with commitments, or with capital?
Waterways News — Covering Nigeria’s Maritime and Blue Economy Sector
How Liberia Turn Its Flag into a Maritime Goldmine — But the Profits Keep Sailing Away
The world’s largest ship registry sits in a West African nation with a $670 per capita income. The ships are everywhere. The money, largely, is not.
By Oghenewoke Osaweren | Waterways News
In the high-pressure world of global shipping, few decisions carry as much financial weight as where a vessel is registered. And right now, more shipowners are making that decision in favour of Liberia than any other country on earth.
As of June 2026, the Liberia-flagged fleet stood at 307.3 million gross tonnage — making the Liberian International Ship and Corporate Registry (LISCR) the first registry in history to cross the 300 million GT threshold. It is the third consecutive year Liberia has held the title of the world’s largest shipping registry, widening its lead over its nearest rival by nearly 45 million gross tons.
The numbers are staggering. The Liberian Ship Registry now accounts for 17 percent of the global fleet, with 6,092 vessels flying its flag, and it represents 28 percent of global newbuilding gross tonnage — meaning more than one in four new ships entering the global fleet now does so under the Liberian colours.
But what pulls the world’s shipowners to a flag planted in one of West Africa’s most impoverished nations? And, critically, what is Liberia itself getting out of the arrangement?
THE MAGNET: WHAT SHIPOWNERS ARE REALLY BUYING
Established in 1948, the Liberian Registry has built its reputation on maritime safety, environmental standards, and administrative efficiency. Yet the hard commercial draw has always been simpler than that: cost reduction on a massive scale.
Shipowners choose Liberia’s open registry for lower taxes and reduced registration fees that can significantly slash operational costs, alongside the freedom to hire multinational crews at competitive wages — bypassing the higher labour costs imposed by national registries in Europe, Asia, or the Americas.
There are no crew nationality restrictions on Liberian vessels, and taxes are assessed at conservative rates based on net tonnage. For owners managing fleets of dozens of vessels, the cumulative savings run into tens of millions of dollars annually.
The registry is administered from Vienna, Virginia, with offices in New York, Hamburg, Hong Kong, London, Piraeus, Tokyo, Zurich, Singapore, and Monrovia, providing clients with 24-hour service. The bureaucratic friction that delays other registries simply does not exist here — a Liberian ship-owning corporation can typically be formed on the same working day instructions are received.
THE CHINA CARD
Beyond the traditional cost advantages, a newer and increasingly consequential incentive has emerged. Under a renewed maritime agreement with the People’s Republic of China, Liberian-flag vessels now enjoy preferential tonnage dues rates at Chinese ports, alongside expedited customs procedures and simplified port formalities — advantages that competing flags such as the Marshall Islands do not enjoy.
In a global shipping economy where China handles a dominant share of cargo, this diplomatic edge is no small commercial consideration.
LIBERIA’S GAIN — ON PAPER
Proponents of the arrangement argue that Liberia benefits meaningfully from the registry’s prestige and revenue. The Liberia Maritime Authority has described holding the world’s largest registry title as both an honour and a responsibility, with Commissioner Neto Zarzar Lighe Sr. pledging commitment to innovation and best practices expected of a Category ‘A’ member of the International Maritime Organisation’s Council.
The registry is reported to generate approximately 25 percent of Liberia’s national income — a figure that, if accurate, would represent a remarkable dependency on a single offshore arrangement. Liberian-flagged vessels also carry more than one-third of the oil imported into the United States, giving Liberia an invisible but powerful role in American energy supply chains.
THE UNCOMFORTABLE ARITHMETIC
But the glowing statistics mask a deeply troubling reality.
According to the Liberia Revenue Authority’s own records, the country received just US$12 million in maritime revenue in the 2019-2020 tax year from LISCR — amounting to only 2.75 percent of its total domestic revenue. More recent estimates place Liberia’s annual take from the registry at approximately $20 million.
Against a backdrop where Liberia’s total GDP stood at $4.75 billion in 2024, with a per capita income of just $670, the question becomes stark: who is really benefiting from the world’s most powerful shipping flag?
When over 130 countries representing 90 percent of global GDP came together in 2021 to agree a historic minimum corporate tax rate of 15 percent for multinationals, shipping alone was excluded — an arrangement that continues to shield the registry’s clients from the kind of global tax reform that would otherwise erode their savings.
The structural explanation is revealing. LISCR is a purpose-made limited liability company registered in Delaware and based in Virginia, with US nationals as exclusive investors under Liberian law — meaning the entity that manages the world’s largest shipping registry is legally and operationally American, not Liberian.
Even the United States Ambassador to Liberia has publicly acknowledged the gap, stating that “the revenue, jobs, and expertise generated by LISCR have the potential to benefit Liberia’s economy in nearly every sector” — while urging that maritime revenues be transparently incorporated into the national budget. The diplomatic phrasing barely conceals the implicit admission: the potential is there, but the delivery has fallen short.
A FLAG THAT FLIES EVERYWHERE, PROFITS THAT LAND NOWHERE NEAR MONROVIA
Liberian investigative voices have grown increasingly vocal, with local media questioning whether registry revenues are ending up in the pockets of a privileged few, including top officials and their political lawyers, rather than flowing into public coffers.
The ITF has long argued that the FOC system lets foreign shipowners use the Liberian flag to benefit from lax regulations and lower operating expenses, resulting in labour exploitation with little meaningful economic benefit returning to Liberia itself.
The paradox is stark enough to have earned a name in academic and policy circles. The downward drag that tax havens brought to government revenues worldwide was once commonly referred to as the “Liberian Problem.”
THE BIGGER PICTURE FOR AFRICA
For maritime-watchers across West Africa — and in Nigeria, where the inland waterways sector continues to seek investment and regulatory frameworks that actually serve national interests — the Liberian registry story carries a cautionary resonance.
A nation can sit at the centre of global maritime commerce, command the allegiance of 6,000 vessels flying its flag across every ocean, carry a third of America’s oil imports, and still struggle to translate that extraordinary leverage into domestic development. The ships sail. The registry grows. The flag waves on every sea.
The revenue, largely, waves goodbye with them.
waterwaysnews.ng covers rivers, coasts, creeks, and the full sweep of Nigeria’s blue economy.
Oil and Gas3 months agoTantita’s Pipeline Deal: $144m Contract, Rising Output, and the Questions that Deserve Answers
- MARITIME TRADE & SHIPPING3 months ago
World’s Largest Container Ship Sets New Maritime Record with 22,233 TEUs on Single Voyage
- Blue Economy4 months ago
Nigeria’s Coast Guard Bill: A Solution in Search of a Problem?
