Editor's Choice
IMO Sets Global Rules for Autonomous Ships — What It Means for Nigeria’s Waterways
IMO Sets Global Rules for Autonomous Ships — What It Means for Nigeria’s Waterways
By Ighoyota Onaibre | Waterways News Reporter
The global shipping community reached a significant milestone last week as the International Maritime Organization (IMO) formally adopted the world’s first international regulatory framework for autonomous commercial vessels — a development that carries direct implications for Nigeria’s growing interest in technology-driven waterway transportation.
The new instrument, known as the International Code of Safety for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS Code), was approved during the 111th session of the IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee, held in London from May 13 to 22. The committee adopted a global code for autonomous ships and advanced guidelines for ships operating on alternative fuels.. This represents the clearest signal yet that self-navigating and remotely operated vessels are no longer a distant concept but an emerging reality that global regulators must now govern.
For Nigeria — a country with approximately 10,000 kilometres of navigable inland waterways and a Federal Government increasingly focused on the Blue Economy — the development is one to watch closely.
A Framework for the Future
The MASS Code defines four distinct levels of vessel automation, beginning with ships fitted with computerised decision-support tools and extending all the way to fully autonomous vessels capable of making operational choices without any direct human control. Each level carries its own set of safety, accountability and communications obligations.
The code addresses a wide range of technical concerns, including cybersecurity vulnerabilities, remote communications infrastructure, navigation systems, fire safety, cargo handling, machinery management, watchkeeping standards and search-and-rescue responsibilities during autonomous operations.
Among the more complex questions the IMO grappled with in developing the framework were who legally qualifies as the “master” of a vessel during autonomous operations, the duties of remote operators stationed onshore, and how liability would be apportioned in the event of incidents involving machine-driven decision-making — issues that no existing international maritime law had adequately resolved.
Nigeria and the Technology Conversation
As Nigerian authorities continue to modernise the country’s waterway sector, the emergence of an internationally recognised autonomous vessel framework creates both opportunities and responsibilities. Nigeria has previously received unmanned vessel technology through international partnerships, and there is growing discussion about digitalisation across the country’s ports and ferry services. The MASS Code now provides a formal global reference point against which any domestic deployment of autonomous or remotely operated vessels would need to be assessed.
Phased Implementation
The code will not immediately become binding. The IMO has structured a phased approach, beginning with a voluntary experience-building phase later in 2026 to collect operational data from real-world deployments around the world. Work on a mandatory version of the code is expected to commence in 2028, with adoption targeted for 2030 and the regulations set to enter into force in January 2032.
This timeline offers Nigerian regulators and stakeholders a window to study the framework, participate in international consultations, and begin aligning domestic policy where necessary — particularly given Nigeria’s ambition to develop its inland waterway corridors as commercial and passenger transport routes.
Broader Safety Agenda
Beyond autonomous shipping, the Maritime Safety Committee’s 111th session also addressed growing security concerns in the Strait of Hormuz, greenhouse gas safety standards linked to alternative marine fuels, and updated technical regulations for vessels powered by hydrogen and ammonia. The meeting signals that the IMO’s regulatory agenda is accelerating across multiple fronts, and Nigeria’s maritime and waterways agencies will need to stay engaged at the international level to ensure the country’s interests are reflected as these frameworks continue to evolve.
🇳🇬 NIGERIA WATCH Tracking the story across Ministries, Departments and Agencies
Federal Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy As the supervising ministry for Nigeria’s entire maritime and waterways sector, the FMMBE carries the primary responsibility for interpreting the MASS Code and determining how it aligns with Nigeria’s Blue Economy roadmap. The ministry will need to initiate a policy review that positions Nigeria to participate actively in the IMO’s experience-building phase beginning later in 2026, and to begin preparing a domestic regulatory position ahead of the mandatory code expected by 2030. Nigeria’s ongoing campaign for a seat on the IMO Council makes early and visible engagement with this framework a matter of both policy and diplomatic credibility.
Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) As Nigeria’s flag state administration and the body directly interfacing with the IMO, NIMASA is the agency most immediately affected by the MASS Code. The agency will be expected to review Nigeria’s Ship Safety framework to determine how existing regulations governing vessel certification, inspection and crew standards apply — or fail to apply — to autonomous and remotely operated vessels. NIMASA will also need to develop a clear stance on the liability and manning questions the MASS Code raises, particularly around the definition of “master” in autonomous operations and the regulatory status of remote operators.
National Inland Waterways Authority (NIWA) NIWA governs Nigeria’s vast inland waterway network — the very environment where autonomous and remotely operated vessels are most likely to be used domestically, given the shorter route distances involved. The authority must begin assessing its existing licensing and inspection frameworks to determine whether they are adequate for vessels operating with reduced or no crew. NIWA’s ongoing digitalisation efforts and its Nigeria Water Transportation Code provide a useful foundation, but autonomous vessel operations will require new thinking around remote monitoring, jetty infrastructure compatibility and waterway traffic management.
Lagos State Waterways Authority (LASWA) As the busiest waterway state agency in Nigeria, managing one of Africa’s most active urban ferry networks, LASWA has a direct interest in how autonomous vessel technology could eventually be applied to Lagos’s water transportation system. The authority should be tracking the MASS Code closely, given ongoing conversations around modernising the Lagos ferry fleet and reducing accident rates. Any future introduction of remotely operated ferries on Lagos waterways would fall within the regulatory scope that the MASS Code is now beginning to define globally.
Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) Port operations are explicitly addressed within the MASS Code, raising questions about how autonomous vessels arriving at or departing from Nigerian ports would be handled in terms of berthing, pilotage, and port state control inspections. The NPA will need to consider whether its port infrastructure, communications systems and operational protocols are compatible with vessels that may have no crew aboard or may be operated remotely from a distant control centre.
Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) The arrival of autonomous cargo vessels at Nigerian ports raises important questions for customs operations — specifically around vessel boarding, documentation verification, and the chain of responsibility for goods carried on crewless ships. The NCS will need to engage with NIMASA and the NPA to develop a joint position on how existing customs boarding and inspection procedures would be adapted for autonomous vessel operations.
Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA) / Nigerian Navy The MASS Code’s attention to cybersecurity is particularly significant from a national security perspective. Autonomous vessels operating in Nigerian waters — whether coastal or inland — represent a potential vulnerability if their remote control systems are compromised. The Nigerian Navy and ONSA should be part of any inter-agency working group established to develop Nigeria’s domestic response to the MASS Code, with specific attention to the cybersecurity and sovereignty dimensions of remotely operated vessels in Nigeria’s territorial waters and exclusive economic zone.
Federal Ministry of Communications, Innovation and Digital Economy Autonomous vessels are entirely dependent on robust, low-latency communications infrastructure for remote operation and real-time monitoring. The ministry’s work on expanding broadband connectivity — including to coastal and riverine communities — is therefore directly relevant to whether autonomous vessel technology can practically function in Nigerian waters. A policy conversation between this ministry and the FMMBE has yet to happen publicly; the MASS Code makes it necessary.
National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) As the agency responsible for regulating and developing Nigeria’s digital ecosystem, NITDA has a role to play in establishing cybersecurity standards for maritime technology systems. The MASS Code’s strong emphasis on cybersecurity for autonomous vessels means that NITDA’s frameworks will need to be extended explicitly to cover maritime digital infrastructure, particularly remote vessel control systems.
Waterways News | waterwaysnews.ng
NMLA Raises Alarm: National Single Window Risks Collapse Without Legal Anchor
Nigeria’s ambitious National Single Window trade facilitation project is hurtling toward a legal cliff edge — and maritime lawyers are sounding the alarm.
By Emetena Ikuku | Waterways News Reporter | Lagos | May 27, 2026
The Nigerian Maritime Law Association (NMLA) has issued a stark warning that the initiative, designed to consolidate cargo clearance procedures across all government agencies into a single digital portal, could unravel without an urgent statutory framework to back it up. The association is calling on the National Assembly to act without delay, either by enacting a standalone National Single Window Act or by amending existing legislation such as the Business Facilitation Act to provide the project with explicit legal grounding.
The warning was delivered at the NMLA’s fourth maritime industry breakfast meeting in Lagos, where association President Mike Igbokwe, SAN, laid out the legal risks in unsparing terms.
6th from left, Director National Single Window, Mr Tola Fakolade, the President Nigeria Maritime Law Association, Mr Mike Igbokwe (SAN) and other executive members during the 4th breakfast Meeting held in Lagos on Friday last week
“We believe it is better to have legislation in place before implementation,” Igbokwe told attendees. “But what we are seeing now is that implementation has started without an Act of the National Assembly enacted to drive it.”
That sequence — action before authority — is precisely what worries the legal community. Without a clear enabling law, the Single Window system has no defined mandate, no designated coordinating agency and no enforceable operational framework. In practical terms, that creates fertile ground for legal disputes, agency turf wars and the kind of administrative confusion that has historically plagued port reform efforts in Nigeria.
A Trade Haemorrhage Nigeria Cannot Afford
The stakes could hardly be higher. Nigeria’s ports have long been among the most expensive and time-consuming in sub-Saharan Africa, a problem driven in large part by the proliferation of agencies that importers and exporters must navigate independently before their cargo can move.
Igbokwe described the current situation bluntly: traders are forced to shuttle between multiple government bodies — each with its own processes, fees and timelines — at every stage of the clearance cycle. The result is inflated costs, longer dwell times and a competitive disadvantage that is pushing cargo away from Nigerian ports entirely.
“We have overlapping functions, multiple agencies doing different things. That wastes time, effort and money,” he said. “The idea is to harmonise everything through one single window so that all agencies are connected and people do not have to move from one agency to another for different stages of cargo clearance.”
The economic fallout is already visible. Igbokwe warned that importers are increasingly rerouting consignments meant for Lagos and other Nigerian gateways to ports in neighbouring countries, where clearance processes are simpler and more predictable. “The nation is bleeding,” he said. “Because of the high cost of imported goods arising from the multiplicity of procedures and costs, many goods meant for Nigerian ports are going to neighbouring ports. We are losing revenue.”
A Window Without a Frame
The National Single Window concept is not new to Nigeria — it has been discussed, studied and piloted in various forms for years. But the NMLA’s concern is that the latest iteration is being pushed forward without the institutional architecture needed to sustain it.
Tola Fakolade, Director of the National Single Window Project, reinforced that point at the breakfast meeting, stressing that regulatory reform is essential not just for the project’s efficiency but for its long-term survival and insulation from political interference.
That concern is well-founded. Nigerian port reforms have a long history of stalling or reversing when the political winds shift or when powerful agency interests reassert themselves. A statutory foundation would make the Single Window harder to dismantle, strip of funding or quietly shelved when priorities change.
Igbokwe acknowledged that the legislative calendar presents its own challenges — elections, political distractions and competing priorities routinely slow the passage of bills. But he argued that these obstacles are not insurmountable where executive support and political will exist.
What Needs to Happen
The NMLA’s position is clear: the National Assembly must pass either a dedicated Single Window Act or amend existing law before the project advances further. The legislation, the association argues, should clearly define which agency holds coordinating authority, establish enforceable data-sharing obligations across all government entities operating at the ports, set out dispute resolution mechanisms and create accountability structures.
For a platform like Waterways News, whose reporting has consistently tracked the structural bottlenecks strangling Nigeria’s maritime trade corridors, the NMLA’s intervention is timely. Nigeria cannot transform its port sector through technology alone. Systems require mandates, and mandates require law. Until the National Assembly acts, the National Single Window remains a promising architecture built on a foundation of sand.
NIGERIA WATCH Tracking the story across government ministries, departments and agencies
This story touches the mandate of the following ministries, departments and agencies. Waterways News will be monitoring their response.
Federal Ministry of Marine & Blue Economy As the supervising ministry for Nigeria’s ports and maritime trade infrastructure, the ministry bears direct responsibility for championing the legislative push for a Single Window Act. It should be driving executive support for the bill and coordinating inter-agency buy-in. Status: No public position on legislation yet declared.
Federal Ministry of Finance / Presidential Fiscal Policy & Tax Reform Committee Trade facilitation sits at the heart of Nigeria’s revenue and fiscal reform agenda. The absence of a legal framework for the Single Window directly undermines targets around import duty collection efficiency and port revenue optimisation. Status: Monitoring.
Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) As the principal port management body, NPA is a key agency whose functions must be integrated into any functional Single Window system. Overlapping mandates between NPA and other port agencies are among the core problems the initiative is designed to solve. Status: Yet to make a public commitment to the legislative process.
Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) Customs is arguably the agency with the most to gain — and the most to lose — from a unified clearance system. A Single Window would reshape how Customs interfaces with importers, agents and fellow agencies. Legislative clarity is essential to define its role within the new architecture. Status: Monitoring.
Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) NIMASA’s regulatory functions overlap with several agencies involved in cargo clearance and port operations. Its cooperation will be critical to eliminating duplicated processes under the Single Window. Status: No formal statement on the legislative question.
National Assembly — Senate Committee on Marine Transport / House Committee on Ports & Harbours The ball is ultimately in the legislature’s court. The NMLA has called for either a standalone National Single Window Act or targeted amendments to the Business Facilitation Act. Both chambers must move with urgency. Status: No bill listed on either chamber’s active legislative agenda as of publication.
Presidential Enabling Business Environment Council (PEBEC) PEBEC was established specifically to reduce bureaucratic bottlenecks to doing business in Nigeria. The absence of a legal framework for the Single Window — a flagship ease-of-doing-business reform — falls squarely within its mandate. Status: Monitoring.
WaterwaysNews.ng | Nigeria’s Leading Maritime News Platform | Nigeria Watch is a Waterways News accountability segment that tracks how relevant government institutions respond to issues raised in our reporting.
Rail-Sea Connectivity Key to Unlocking Nigeria’s Blue Economy Potential, NSC Says
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News Reporter | Lagos, May 26, 2026
The Nigerian Shippers’ Council (NSC) has thrown its weight behind deeper rail-to-port integration as a critical strategy for easing cargo congestion, cutting logistics costs and accelerating the growth of Nigeria’s Blue Economy.
Dr Juliana Saka, Assistant Director and Head of the Designate Unit at the NSC, made this known on Monday during the Children’s Day Blue Talents Rail-to-Sea Programme held in Apapa, Lagos. The event was organised by the Ocean Ambassadors Foundation in partnership with APM Terminals.
Dr Saka argued that rail transport holds the key to moving large cargo volumes from seaports to inland markets efficiently, reducing the burden on road infrastructure while cutting down on emissions and logistics bottlenecks that currently plague Nigeria’s port corridors.
She noted that dedicated rail corridors would significantly reduce the time cargo sits idle at ports, improve throughput and give shippers faster, cleaner access to factories and distribution hubs across the country.
“When rail connects to ports, supply chains become faster and more reliable. It reduces gate congestion, shortens dwell times, lowers costs and eases pressure on roads,” she said.
Saka pointed out that while the ocean remains an efficient cargo mover, delays pile up at the port gate because road networks, truck parks and terminals are struggling to keep pace with rising trade volumes. She noted that close to 60 per cent of freight currently moves by road — a situation that drives up congestion, emissions and costs, particularly in high-growth trade corridors like Lagos.
Integrating rail into the Blue Economy framework, she said, would bridge the gap between seaports and the hinterland, enabling more reliable cargo movement with a reduced environmental footprint.
However, she identified several systemic challenges holding back rail cargo growth at Lagos ports — including customs delays, multiple checkpoints, overlapping charges and fragmented regulations. Inconsistent fees and slow approval processes, she said, inflate cargo dwell time and erode the competitiveness of rail as a logistics option.
To turn the tide, Dr Saka called for direct rail connections to Lagos ports, the development of inland container depots in Ibadan, Kano and Kaduna, and the upgrading of standard gauge rail corridors. She also advocated for harmonised customs procedures, an expanded single-window system and simplified intermodal tariffs to improve cost predictability for shippers.
On the institutional side, she recommended the establishment of a Rail-Port Integration Authority, increased public-private partnership investment and regular stakeholder engagement to resolve operational challenges as they arise.
On technology, Saka urged the deployment of e-booking and cargo tracking platforms, alongside training for operators in intermodal logistics management. She further proposed pilot rail corridors — beginning with Lagos-Ibadan — backed by temporary incentives to attract early investment into the sector.
For a publication like Waterways News, which tracks Nigeria’s maritime and inland waterways sector, the push for rail-sea integration carries particular significance: a functioning multimodal network connecting rail, road and waterways could transform port efficiency and position Nigeria’s Blue Economy as a continental leader.
Nigerian Navy Marks 70 Years With Fleet That Has Grown Tenfold
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News Correspondent
Seventy years after its establishment, the Nigerian Navy has grown from a modest colonial inheritance of 11 vessels into a maritime force of more than 100 warships and patrol boats — a tenfold expansion that reflects both the ambition and the evolving security demands of a nation defined by water.
The milestone was highlighted on Sunday by Rear Admiral Ebiobowei Zipele, Flag Officer Commanding Naval Training Command, during an interdenominational church service held in Onne, Rivers State, as part of activities marking the service’s 70th anniversary.
“When the Navy was established in 1956, it began operations with only 11 vessels transferred from the British Royal Navy,” Zipele told the congregation. Today, he said, that modest fleet has expanded into one of Africa’s leading maritime security forces, with over 100 ships and boats deployed across Nigeria’s territorial waters, exclusive economic zone, and critical waterway corridors.
From Inheritance to Air Power
The transformation has not been limited to surface vessels. Zipele said the creation of the Navy’s air arm — comprising helicopters and surveillance drones — had significantly enhanced the service’s ability to monitor vast stretches of open water and respond rapidly to emerging threats. The integration of aerial assets into naval operations has been particularly important given the sheer scale of Nigeria’s maritime territory, which covers more than 850 kilometres of coastline and an exclusive economic zone stretching some 200 nautical miles into the Atlantic.
For a waterways sector that depends on secure sea lanes to function — from oil exports through the Niger Delta to commercial shipping into the ports of Apapa and Tin Can Island — the Navy’s evolving posture has direct consequences.
Piracy in Retreat — For Now
Perhaps the Navy’s most cited achievement in recent years is the sharp reduction in piracy across the Gulf of Guinea. Zipele credited the service with significantly dismantling piracy networks in Nigeria’s waters and the wider Gulf over the past three years, a development he said had measurably boosted investor confidence and commercial shipping activity in the region.
The Gulf of Guinea was, until recently, ranked among the world’s most dangerous shipping corridors. International maritime organisations had for years flagged the area as a hotspot for vessel hijackings, crew kidnappings, and cargo theft — incidents that drove up insurance premiums and deterred shipping lines. The recent drop in recorded incidents has been widely attributed to increased naval patrols, intelligence-sharing arrangements with regional navies, and the deployment of deep-water assets.
Yet Zipele was candid that the gains are fragile. “The Nigerian Navy cannot be everywhere at the same time,” he acknowledged — a statement that reflects the operational reality of patrolling one of the world’s busiest and most resource-rich maritime zones with a fleet that, despite its growth, remains stretched.
A Whole-of-Society Response
To bridge the gaps, the Navy has increasingly leaned on a network of partner agencies. Zipele identified the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA), the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA), the Nigeria Customs Service, the Nigeria Immigration Service, and private security firm Tantita Security Services as key collaborators in maintaining order on Nigeria’s waterways.
The inclusion of Tantita — a company founded by former militant leader Government Ekpemupolo, known as Tompolo — underlines the pragmatic, and at times controversial, approach the federal government has taken to securing the creeks and offshore fields of the Niger Delta.
Nigeria Watch: What the Anniversary Means for Nigeria’s Waterways
For stakeholders in Nigeria’s inland and coastal waterways sector, the Navy’s anniversary is a reminder of both progress and persistent vulnerability. Waterway-dependent communities — from fishing villages along the Bight of Benin to ferry operators on the Lagos Lagoon — remain exposed to criminal activity that conventional naval deployments are not always positioned to address.
As cargo volumes through Nigeria’s ports continue to rise and pressure mounts on road infrastructure, the case for securing and developing the country’s waterways has never been stronger. A Navy better equipped to protect those corridors is an essential part of that equation.
The service turns 70 with more ships, more reach, and more tools than at any point in its history. Whether that is enough to match the scale of Nigeria’s maritime ambitions remains the defining question of the decade ahead.
WaterwaysNews.ng | Nigeria’s Leading Maritime News Platform
-
Oil and Gas3 months agoTantita’s Pipeline Deal: $144m Contract, Rising Output, and the Questions that Deserve Answers
-
Blue Economy3 months agoNigeria’s Coast Guard Bill: A Solution in Search of a Problem?
-
MARITIME TRADE & SHIPPING3 months agoWorld’s Largest Container Ship Sets New Maritime Record with 22,233 TEUs on Single Voyage