Security & Safety
MAERSK PULLS BACK FROM RED SEA AGAIN — WHAT IT MEANS FOR WEST AFRICAN SHIPPING
MAERSK PULLS BACK FROM RED SEA AGAIN — WHAT IT MEANS FOR WEST AFRICAN SHIPPING
The world’s largest container line has reversed course on its Red Sea comeback, raising fresh concerns for Nigerian importers and shippers already navigating tight supply chains.
Danish shipping giant Maersk has announced a temporary withdrawal from the Suez–Red Sea corridor on two of its major services, just weeks after cautiously resuming transits through the troubled waterway.
In a customer advisory dated February 27, the carrier described the move as “temporary adjustments” affecting its ME11 and MECL services — but for cargo interests across West Africa, the implications could be anything but temporary.
Why Maersk Is Turning Back
The company cited what it called “unforeseen constraints” stemming from the wider operating environment in the Red Sea region. After consultations with security partners, Maersk concluded that reliably avoiding delays through the area had become too difficult to guarantee.
As a result, several upcoming voyages on both affected services will be diverted away from the Suez Canal and rerouted around the Cape of Good Hope — adding thousands of nautical miles, additional sailing days, and higher fuel costs to each voyage.
The Services Affected
The MECL service — an independently operated route linking Saudi Arabia and other Middle East ports with the U.S. East Coast — will see its next three eastbound and westbound sailings rerouted via southern Africa through mid-March.
More significantly, the ME11 service connecting India and the Middle East to the Mediterranean will have its next three westbound and four eastbound voyages diverted around the Cape. The ME11 operates under the Gemini Cooperation, the vessel-sharing alliance between Maersk and Germany’s Hapag-Lloyd, giving the decision added weight across the industry.
Maersk said it was giving customers three weeks’ notice to adjust supply chain plans, with updated transport schedules to follow.
A Fragile Return Unravels
The reversal is notable for its timing. Just over two weeks ago, a Maersk vessel completed the first eastbound Suez transit on the reinstated ME11 route — a carefully watched moment that many in the shipping world had hoped signalled a durable return to the corridor.
That optimism now appears premature. Earlier in January, Maersk had cautioned that sailings through the region would depend on stable security conditions and reliable naval protection. Those conditions, it now says, are not holding consistently enough.
Security Challenges Persist
The broader security picture in the Red Sea remains uneasy. Yemen’s Houthi movement has made intermittent threats, though no confirmed attacks on merchant vessels have been recorded since last September. Meanwhile, rising U.S.-Iran tensions and an expanded American naval presence in the Middle East have added layers of unpredictability to the region.
On the protection side, the European Union’s maritime security mission, Operation Aspides — which deploys three warships to escort commercial vessels through the corridor — was recently extended through February 2027. However, limited escort capacity has created scheduling bottlenecks, with French carrier CMA CGM previously flagging long waits for available naval cover as a major operational headache.
What This Means for Nigerian Shippers
For cargo stakeholders in Nigeria and across the Gulf of Guinea, renewed Red Sea disruptions carry direct consequences. Longer Cape of Good Hope routings push up transit times and freight costs — pressures that typically filter through to Nigerian importers and end consumers.
The ME11 service in particular feeds cargo flows between Asia, the Middle East, and Europe, with knock-on effects for connecting services that serve West African ports. Any sustained return to Cape routing by major carriers would likely tighten vessel availability and complicate scheduling on feeder and direct services calling at Nigerian terminals.
Industry watchers say Maersk’s decision could prompt other carriers to slow or reconsider their own Red Sea comeback plans — further prolonging a disruption that has reshaped global shipping patterns since late 2023.
Maersk maintains the rerouting is short-term and continues to describe the Suez corridor as the fastest, most sustainable option for customers. But as confidence in the route proves fragile once again, the Cape of Good Hope remains, for now, the safer bet.
Waterways News NG will continue to monitor developments in the Red Sea and their implications for Nigerian and West African maritime trade.
— Waterways News NG | www.waterwaysnews.ng
Tin Can Customs Nets 204 More Pump-Action Rifles Smuggled in From Turkey
By Emetena Ikuku | Waterways News
The Nigeria Customs Service’s Tin Can Island Port Command has recorded another major arms interception, recovering 204 pump-action rifles concealed in a container that arrived from Turkey, the second such haul at the command in under three weeks.
The seizure was disclosed at a Monday briefing at the port by Deputy Comptroller-General Timi Bomodi, who heads Enforcement, Investigation and Inspection at Customs headquarters and spoke on behalf of Comptroller-General Bashir Adewale Adeniyi.
According to Bomodi, a 20-foot container that reached Nigeria aboard the vessel MV Algeciras Express on August 16 was flagged on the basis of intelligence and pulled for full physical examination two days later. Officers found knocked-down firearm components hidden among a declared cargo of used furniture, refrigerators, solar panels and detergent. Investigators also noted inconsistencies in the shipment’s paperwork, particularly around the identity of the consignee, and say that thread remains under investigation.
A joint team drawn from the Customs Armament Unit and the National Centre for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons, working under the Office of the National Security Adviser, assembled the parts into 204 complete MAS 49 Alter Magnum pump-action rifles. Customs also catalogued a large volume of leftover components, including dozens of trigger pins, locking lugs, charging handles, springs, barrels and pistol grips, which will be handed over alongside the assembled weapons for statutory disposal.
The find follows an August 18 seizure at the same command, when the Comptroller-General personally announced the interception of knocked-down parts later assembled into 399 pump-action rifles.
Bomodi framed the recovery as evidence that the Service’s risk-management and profiling systems are closing off the concealment tactics smugglers have relied on, and said the priority now is tracing the full supply chain, from origin and shipment to the intended buyers, rather than stopping at the seizure itself. Customs Area Controller for Tin Can Island, Compt. Joe Anani, added that the command does not intend to be an easy route for dangerous or prohibited imports into Nigeria.
The rifles were formally handed to the South-West Zonal Director of the National Centre for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons, CP Abiodun Alamutu (rtd), for further statutory action.
Nigeria Watch
Two firearms seizures out of one command in three weeks, 603 pump-action rifles between them, say less about a single smuggling attempt than about a route. Tin Can Island has now surfaced twice running as the entry point of choice for parts shipped in a disassembled state and hidden inside legitimate-looking used-goods cargo, a method built to survive a cursory look and only fail under full physical examination.
For the ports and waterways sector, the story sits inside the wider Gulf of Guinea security conversation that Waterways News has tracked through the Deep Blue Project and the Navy’s anti-piracy posture: land-side arms trafficking through container cargo is as much a threat vector as offshore piracy, and it feeds the same informal weapons economy that inland waterway operators say complicates their own security exposure on the creeks and rivers.
The unresolved question in Bomodi’s own account, the mismatched consignee details still under investigation, is the one worth watching. Seizures make headlines; whether the paperwork trail leads back to identifiable importers and financiers is what will determine if this is enforcement working, or enforcement catching only the visible tip of a recurring supply line into Nigerian ports.
BOAT OPERATORS ARE THE FIRST RESPONDERS ON THE LAGOON
.…..Carter bridge rescue exposes gap
By Oghenewoke Osaweren | Waterways News
Lagos, Nigeria. For the second time in just over a year, informal boat operators, not any designated emergency service, were the ones who pulled a woman alive from the Lagos Lagoon after she jumped from Carter Bridge, raising fresh questions about who is actually responsible for water rescue on one of Africa’s busiest urban waterways.
The unidentified woman jumped from the Idumota end of the bridge on the afternoon of Tuesday, August 4. Eyewitnesses said local boat operators working within the area reacted within moments, pulling her from the water before she could be swept further into the lagoon’s currents. Video circulating on social media shows her seated inside a wooden canoe, visibly disoriented, as bystanders on the bridge above shouted down, some pleading with the operators not to hand her over to the police, others audibly distressed and asking what could have driven her to the water’s edge.
A PATTERN AT THE SAME BRIDGE
This is not an isolated site incident. In July 2025, a separate woman was intercepted at the same Carter Bridge location, that time by police Rapid Response Squad officers on routine patrol, before she entered the water. Tuesday’s case had no such patrol presence. The outcome depended entirely on boat operators who happened to be working nearby.
Carter Bridge, opened in 1901, is one of only three crossings linking Lagos Island to the mainland, alongside Eko and Third Mainland bridges, and sits directly over lagoon waters used daily by commercial boat traffic, artisanal fishermen and ferry operators. That density of water traffic is precisely why informal operators keep ending up as the default emergency responders, they are simply the ones already on the water when someone goes in.
NO FORMAL WATER RESCUE MANDATE
Neither the Lagos State Waterways Authority (LASWA) nor the National Inland Waterways Authority (NIWA) operates a dedicated, publicised rapid-response rescue protocol for bridge-jump incidents on Lagos waterways, despite the lagoon’s role as a primary transport corridor for hundreds of thousands of commuters. Search-and-rescue capacity for road-based emergencies sits with the police and, in some cases, the Lagos State Emergency Management Agency (LASEMA) but water incidents routinely fall to whichever boat happens to be nearest, with no formal reporting chain back to state authorities on outcomes, casualty data or referral to mental health support afterward.
That gap matters beyond this single case. Nigeria records among the highest estimated suicide rates in West Africa according to World Health Organization modelling, yet has no national suicide prevention strategy comparable to those adopted elsewhere on the continent, and Lagos, a lagoon city where bridges double as the tallest accessible points over open water, has no publicly documented protocol connecting bridge surveillance, water rescue and post-rescue mental health referral into a single chain of response.
WHAT HAPPENED AFTER THE RESCUE
As of the time of filing, the woman’s identity, condition and the circumstances that led to the incident remain undisclosed. It is not yet known whether she was handed to police, taken to a hospital, or released, despite the pleas heard on video against police involvement, a detail that itself reflects a wider public wariness in Lagos toward treating suicide attempts as a criminal matter rather than a medical one. The Lagos State government had not issued a statement at the time of this report.
This story concerns a suicide attempt. If you or someone you know is struggling, please reach out to a trusted person, a doctor, or a crisis line for support.
Fire Breaks Out at Bono Tank Farm in Olodi-Apapa, Cause Yet Unknown
By Oghenewoke Osaweren | Waterways News
Firefighters were on Friday battling a blaze at Bono Tank Farm in the Coconut area of Olodi-Apapa, Lagos, one of several petroleum storage facilities lining the busy Apapa-Oworonshoki Expressway corridor.
The Lagos State Fire and Rescue Service confirmed the incident, with its spokesperson, Shakiru Amodu, stating that crews had been deployed to the scene to contain the fire and prevent it from spreading to adjoining tank farms and energy installations in the densely industrialised zone.
As at press time, the cause of the fire remained unconfirmed, and there was no official word on casualties or the scale of damage to the facility. Authorities said updates on the investigation and the outcome of firefighting efforts would follow as operations continued.
Nigeria Watch: The blaze once again puts a spotlight on the fire safety architecture around Apapa’s tank farm cluster, an area with concentrations of petroleum storage in the country. Recurring incidents of this kind raise familiar questions for regulators, terminal operators, and depot owners alike: are inspection regimes, firefighting readiness, and emergency evacuation protocols keeping pace with the volume and proximity of fuel storage in the corridor?
With Nigeria’s downstream sector expanding rapidly on the back of Dangote Refinery output and rising import substitution, incidents like this one underline why depot safety compliance deserves the same regulatory urgency being applied to port and vessel safety elsewhere in the sector.
Oil and Gas7 months agoTantita’s Pipeline Deal: $144m Contract, Rising Output, and the Questions that Deserve Answers
- MARITIME TRADE & SHIPPING7 months ago
World’s Largest Container Ship Sets New Maritime Record with 22,233 TEUs on Single Voyage
- Blue Economy7 months ago
Nigeria’s Coast Guard Bill: A Solution in Search of a Problem?
