Blue Economy
NIMASA, Liberia Forge Closer Maritime Ties, Eye Sea-Time Training for African Youths
NIMASA, Liberia Forge Closer Maritime Ties, Eye Sea-Time Training for African Youths
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News Correspondent
The Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) has signalled renewed determination to deepen inter-African maritime cooperation, following a high-level consultative visit by the Honorary Consul of the Republic of Liberia in Lagos, Mr. Dapo Akinosun, SAN, to the Agency’s Lagos headquarters.
Receiving the envoy, NIMASA Director General Dr. Dayo Mobereola described the engagement as a reflection of the enduring bilateral maritime relationship between Nigeria and Liberia, and called for accelerated continent-wide collaboration to unlock Africa’s vast maritime potential.
Capacity, Youth and the Blue Economy
Dr. Mobereola placed particular emphasis on the urgent need to expand sea-time training and practical maritime exposure for African youth, arguing that structured capacity development programmes could position Nigerian and other African seafarers to compete credibly in the global maritime labour market.
“The time has come for African nations to upscale maritime collaboration. The partnership between Nigeria and Liberia will help us build capacity, strengthen regional cooperation, and create opportunities for African youths within the global maritime industry,” the NIMASA DG stated.
He added that maritime capacity must be built beyond national borders, noting that hands-on sea-time experience remains the critical bridge between classroom training and international competitiveness.
IMO Seat and Diplomatic Goodwill
Dr. Mobereola also used the occasion to acknowledge Liberia’s support for Nigeria’s successful campaign for a Category C seat at the International Maritime Organization (IMO), describing the backing as a demonstration of the productive diplomatic and technical relationship both countries have sustained over the years.
Liberia’s Position
Consul Akinosun, for his part, said the visit was designed to reinforce bilateral maritime ties and explore concrete pathways for expanded cooperation across maritime administration, port safety, and trade facilitation. He commended NIMASA’s management for recent reform efforts and pledged Liberia’s readiness for deeper engagement.
“Nigeria has demonstrated genuine commitment to maritime partnership and regional growth. Liberia looks forward to deeper collaboration with NIMASA in maritime administration, safety, capacity development, and trade promotion for the advancement of Africa’s Blue Economy,” Akinosun said.
Also present at the meeting were NIMASA Executive Director, Maritime Labour and Cabotage Service, Mr. Jibril Abba; Director of Reforms Coordination and Strategic Management/Blue Economy Unit, Mrs. Nneka Obianyor; and Mr. Kehinde Ogundimu, Head of the Media Department at the Liberian Consulate in Lagos.
Nigeria Watch: Why This Bilateral Engagement Matters Beyond the Handshake
Diplomatic courtesy visits between maritime regulators and foreign consuls are often dismissed as ceremonial. The NIMASA-Liberia engagement this week, however, carries layered significance that warrants closer reading — particularly for Nigerian shipping stakeholders tracking the Agency’s strategic direction under Dr. Mobereola.
The IMO Dimension
Nigeria’s Category C seat at the International Maritime Organization is not merely a prestige acquisition. It translates into real influence over the rule-setting architecture that governs flag state responsibilities, port state control regimes, and the international conventions under which Nigerian-flagged vessels trade and Nigerian ports are assessed. Liberia’s support for Nigeria’s IMO bid was not incidental — Liberia is one of the world’s largest open registries, operating a flag state of enormous commercial weight through its Liberian International Ship and Corporate Registry (LISCR). When a registry of that scale backs Nigeria’s multilateral ambitions, it signals mutual interest in shaping how African maritime governance is represented at the global table. Nigeria would do well to translate that goodwill into substantive co-sponsorship of positions at IMO sessions, particularly on issues affecting Gulf of Guinea security, seafarer certification equivalences, and the decarbonisation transition costs borne disproportionately by developing maritime states.
The Seafarer Supply Chain Gap
Dr. Mobereola’s emphasis on sea-time training is a pointed acknowledgement of one of the most persistent structural weaknesses in Nigeria’s maritime sector. Nigeria produces maritime academy graduates at a respectable rate across institutions such as the Nigerian Seafarers Development Programme (NSDP) and the various state maritime schools. The bottleneck, long identified by industry insiders, lies not in classroom supply but in the availability of berths — approved vessel positions on internationally recognised ships where cadets can accumulate the documented sea service hours required for STCW certification. Liberia’s registry connections, if properly leveraged, could open pathways for Nigerian cadets to secure sea-time placements on vessels under the Liberian flag, many of which are operated by major international shipowners. This is not a novel idea, but it has never been formalised into a bilateral protocol. The Mobereola-Akinosun meeting presents an opportunity to move that conversation from aspiration to implementation.
Cabotage and Regional Trade Connectivity
Beyond the bilateral, NIMASA’s renewed push for African maritime integration fits within a broader strategic logic that Nigerian policymakers have long articulated but inconsistently executed. The Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund (CVFF), still largely undisbursed, was designed in part to build indigenous fleet capacity that could anchor Nigeria as a regional shipping hub. A more integrated West African maritime space — with harmonised port state control inspections, aligned seafarer certification regimes, and cooperative vessel traffic management — would increase the commercial viability of Nigerian-flagged coastal traders operating routes to Liberia, Sierra Leone, Ghana, and Côte d’Ivoire. Until that regulatory architecture exists, the economics of regional cabotage will remain fragile. Engagements like this week’s Liberia visit are, at minimum, the diplomatic groundwork on which that architecture must eventually be built.
Oyetola Woos Turkish Investors for Fisheries Sector, Vows to Protect Artisanal Fishers
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News
The Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Dr Adegboyega Oyetola, has thrown Nigeria’s fisheries sector open to Turkish investment, insisting that any fresh capital coming into the industry must strengthen and not sideline the millions of Nigerians who depend on artisanal fishing for a living.
Oyetola made the pledge while receiving a delegation from Turkish fisheries and aquaculture firm CRD Impex, led by the company’s General Manager for Fisheries, Cem Tarhan, at his Abuja office. He told the investors the Federal Government was ready to create an investment-friendly climate for credible local and foreign players willing to bring capital, technology and modern value-chain solutions to the sector, on condition that such investment remains inclusive.
“We welcome investors who can bring capital, technology, expertise and modern value-chain solutions to the sector. However, investment must be inclusive and sustainable. It must complement and empower our artisanal fish producers, not undermine their livelihoods,” the Minister said
He listed inadequate infrastructure, poor access to modern fishing technology, weak cold-chain systems, limited processing and storage capacity, and gaps in market access as the major constraints holding back the sector, framing each as an opening for targeted investment rather than a dead end.
The Turkish team, which included CRD Impex founder Hanefi Cardak and Tetra Underwater Services founder Ersun Buyukgoze, toured key fisheries and aquaculture points around the country to size up the terrain first-hand. Stops included the Kirikiri Lighter Terminal in Lagos, the Ozumba Mbadiwe Fish Market in Lekki, and the Esuk Nsidung Beach Market, a major waterfront seafood hub in Calabar, Cross River State.
The Ministry described the visit as part of a broader push to attract serious investment into Nigeria’s blue economy while keeping the welfare of artisanal fishers central to that growth.
Nigeria Watch
The Turkish courtesy call lands squarely in the pattern this desk has tracked all year: big-ticket investment pledges for Nigeria’s waterways, paired with familiar assurances that the small operator won’t be crowded out. The test, as always, is what happens after the photo-op.
Nigeria’s artisanal fishing communities occupy the same economic space as the informal boat operators represented by WABOTAN and ATBOWATON, river- and creek-dependent Nigerians whose livelihoods rise or fall on decisions made far from the waterfront. The infrastructure gaps Oyetola cited which include, weak cold-chain systems, poor storage and limited market access, all mirror the exact complaints this desk has documented from inland waterway operators for years but modernisation announced from Abuja rarely reache the jetties.
Turkish capital chasing Nigerian fisheries and aquaculture is a genuinely new thread, distinct from the Strait of Hormuz shipping story or the CVFF disbursement saga this desk has followed closely. But the underlying question is the same one that has defined Oyetola’s tenure at the Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy: will “inclusive investment” translate into contracts, cooperative partnerships and cold-chain infrastructure that artisanal operators can actually use or will it, like so many blue-economy pledges before it, stall at the courtesy-visit stage?
Waterways News will be watching for the first concrete CRD Impex commitment — site, timeline, or local partnership — as the marker of whether this one is different.
NPERA, NPA Open Technical Talks on Handover of Inland Dry Port Functions
By Ighoyota Onaibre | Waterways News
The Nigerian Ports Economic Regulatory Agency (NPERA) and the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) have begun formal engagement on transferring inland dry port oversight to NPERA, marking the start of what both agencies describe as a critical phase in operationalising Nigeria’s new port regulatory framework.
At a management-level meeting between the two agencies, officials focused on the technical groundwork for the handover, chiefly how to draw clear lines of responsibility and avoid duplication among the government bodies with a stake in inland dry port administration.
NPERA’s Director-General/CEO, Dr Akutah Pius, framed the transition as flowing directly from the Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Dr Adegboyega Oyetola, whom he credited with steering the process toward the sector’s broader development. Akutah was emphatic that NPERA could not carry out the transfer alone, and said the buy-in of every relevant stakeholder agency would be needed to see it through.
He indicated that the Ministry would stay central to coordinating the process even as specific mandates move to the agencies best placed to execute them. Akutah also pointed to the Minister’s earlier interventions during the NPERA Bill’s passage through the National Assembly, which he said had defused inter-agency friction and set the stage for the cooperation now underway.
Describing the purpose of the meeting, Akutah said it was meant to formally kick off the transfer of inland dry port responsibilities to NPERA in fulfilment of its statutory role as economic regulator of the ports sector. He singled out Section 51 of the NPERA Act as a provision that now needs to be put into practical effect to keep the transition orderly and ensure stakeholder roles are properly aligned.
To manage the process going forward, the NPERA boss proposed setting up a joint committee drawing in NPERA, NPA, the National Inland Waterways Authority (NIWA), and the Federal Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy. He argued that inland dry ports matter well beyond the coastline. They extend maritime sector benefits into Nigeria’s hinterland and reinforce the country’s trade and logistics chain.
Responding on behalf of NPA, Managing Director Dr Abubakar Dantsoho welcomed the move and pledged his agency’s full operational and technical backing throughout the transition. He said the process had started on the right footing, and that NPA would furnish updated data on the current state of inland dry ports to inform further discussions, expressing confidence that continued engagement would help the agencies meet their shared objectives.
NPA’s Executive Director, Engr. Lekan Badmus, also commended NPERA for setting the collaboration in motion, calling the meeting a solid first step toward a smooth integration. He noted the two agencies have now moved into the technical phase of the exercise, with close attention being paid to eliminating overlapping functions.
Closing the meeting, Akutah said the proposed joint committee would reconvene with the Minister to seek further guidance and agree on next steps to keep the transition on track.
Nigeria Watch
This meeting is the first visible test of whether the NPERA Act’s promise of a rationalised port regulatory architecture can survive contact with Nigeria’s crowded agency landscape. Section 51’s transfer of inland dry port functions to NPERA looks straightforward on paper; in practice, it touches NPA’s traditional port administration turf, NIWA’s inland waterways mandate, and the Ministry’s coordinating role all at once, precisely the kind of overlapping jurisdiction that has bedevilled reform efforts elsewhere in the sector, most visibly in the long-running NIWA-LASWA tussle that only the Supreme Court could settle.
The proposed joint committee of NPERA, NPA, NIWA, and the Ministry, is a sensible mechanism, but Waterways News readers who have followed the CVFF disbursement saga know that Nigerian maritime governance has no shortage of well-designed committees whose outputs never quite reach implementation. What will matter is whether Akutah’s “technical phase” produces a binding timeline, not another round of goodwill statements.
For inland dry port operators and the hinterland trade corridors that depend on them, the stakes are practical: unclear jurisdiction between NPA and NPERA has historically meant slower cargo evacuation, duplicated levies, and uncertainty for freight forwarders planning routes away from the congested Lagos ports. If this transition is handled well, it strengthens the case for dry ports as genuine pressure valves for Apapa and Tin Can. If it stalls in inter-agency turf negotiation, it becomes one more entry in the gap between policy pronouncement and delivery that this desk continues to track.
Worth watching: whether Minister Oyetola’s office sets an explicit deadline when the committee reconvenes, and whether NIWA, whose inland waterways mandate intersects with dry port hinterland connectivity, gets more than a seat at the table.
Two More Tankers Struck in Strait of Hormuz as Attack Count Hits Five in a Week
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News
Two more tankers have been hit while transiting the Strait of Hormuz, leaving two seafarers with minor injuries and pushing the number of reported attacks or security incidents against commercial vessels in the waterway to at least five since 16 September.
The UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) centre said an inbound tanker was struck by an unidentified projectile on Monday. Two crew members sustained minor injuries, but the vessel stayed under its own power and continued to its next port, with no environmental impact reported.
Hours later, UKMTO issued a second alert after an outbound LPG tanker reported being struck by debris from unknown projectiles. All crew were reported safe and the vessel also continued its voyage. Authorities are investigating both incidents, and UKMTO has not attributed either attack to a specific actor.
The two strikes build on a Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC) advisory covering three earlier attacks between 16 and 18 September, one of which saw a tanker’s hull breached by a projectile, sparking a fire. JMIC continues to rate the threat level in the strait as “severe,” citing a high likelihood of deliberate hostile action and pointing to a pattern of harassment by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps — drone overflights, surveillance of merchant vessels and VHF hailing, alongside the direct attacks.
Traffic through the chokepoint remains sharply depressed. Only 17 commodity vessels were visibly transiting over the weekend, down from 37 the week before and against a pre-war daily average of roughly 125. That figure excludes vessels sailing with their AIS transponders switched off, and JMIC notes a persistent gap between visible and actual traffic.
Nigeria Watch
For Nigerian maritime stakeholders, the Hormuz crisis is no longer a distant Gulf story. It is a cost line. Every fresh escalation feeds directly into the war-risk insurance premiums and freight rates that Nigerian importers, refiners and shipping agents ultimately absorb, since global tanker and container capacity pulled off the Hormuz route tightens supply elsewhere and pushes rates up across long-haul trades, including those serving West African ports.
The renewed attacks also sharpen the stakes around Nigeria’s push for a stronger voice at the IMO Council table and its broader blue-economy diplomacy under Minister Adegboyega Oyetola. A sustained Gulf disruption is exactly the kind of systemic shock that tests whether Nigeria’s seat translates into influence over how global shipping risk, insurance and rerouting decisions are made, rather than Nigeria simply absorbing the downstream cost.
Locally, the episode is a reminder of the layered nature of “maritime security” as a policy word: the Deep Blue Project and Gulf of Guinea security architecture address piracy and armed robbery close to home, but Nigeria’s ports and shippers remain exposed to security failures thousands of kilometres away in the Gulf.
Waterways News will continue tracking how the Hormuz situation feeds into freight cost pressure at Nigerian ports and NIMASA’s public messaging on the issue.
Oil and Gas7 months agoTantita’s Pipeline Deal: $144m Contract, Rising Output, and the Questions that Deserve Answers
- MARITIME TRADE & SHIPPING7 months ago
World’s Largest Container Ship Sets New Maritime Record with 22,233 TEUs on Single Voyage
- Blue Economy7 months ago
Nigeria’s Coast Guard Bill: A Solution in Search of a Problem?
