Blue Economy
Revamp Nigeria’s Inland Waterways: CVFF Must Fund Standard Boats
Revamp Nigeria’s Inland Waterways: CVFF Must Fund Standard Boats
Nigeria’s inland waterways, a vital artery for transport and trade, urgently need a facelift to boost safety and efficiency. Experts say the Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund (CVFF) should be deployed to acquire standard, modern boats for operators on these routes. Using CVFF to fund such vessels will not only improve passenger safety but also enhance cargo movement, reduce accidents, and stimulate economic growth across riverine communities. Stakeholders urge government and maritime authorities to prioritize this investment, ensuring Nigeria’s waterways match global standards and support sustainable development.
The Case for CVFF-Funded Standard Vessels: Why Nigeria Cannot Afford to Wait
Nigeria is blessed with an estimated 10,000 kilometres of navigable inland waterways, including the Niger and Benue rivers, the Cross River, and a labyrinth of creeks and lakes that cut through some of the country’s most densely populated and economically active regions. Yet, despite this enormous natural endowment, the waterways sector remains one of the most neglected in Nigeria’s transport infrastructure landscape. Rickety wooden canoes, overloaded and poorly maintained ferries, and the near-total absence of life-saving equipment have become the tragic hallmarks of inland water transport in Nigeria. The time to act is now, and the Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund (CVFF) holds the key.
What Is the CVFF and Why Is It Relevant?
Established under the Coastal and Inland Shipping (Cabotage) Act of 2003, the CVFF was specifically designed to provide financial support to indigenous Nigerian shipowners seeking to acquire, build, or upgrade vessels for use in Nigerian waters. The fund, administered by the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA), has accumulated billions of naira in contributions from foreign shipping companies operating in Nigerian waters. Ironically, while the fund sits largely underutilised, Nigerians continue to perish daily in avoidable waterway accidents. Redirecting a meaningful portion of CVFF resources toward the acquisition of standardised ferry boats for inland waterways operators is not only logical — it is a moral imperative.
Safety Crisis Demands Urgent Action
The statistics surrounding inland waterway accidents in Nigeria are deeply troubling. The National Inland Waterways Authority (NIWA) has consistently reported dozens of fatal boat mishaps annually, with many incidents going unrecorded in remote riverine communities. In most cases, the vessels involved are wooden boats with no life jackets, no navigation lights, no radio communication equipment, and no structural integrity to withstand even mild weather conditions. Deploying CVFF funds to procure modern, certified ferry boats — built to International Maritime Organization (IMO) standards — would dramatically reduce fatalities and instil public confidence in water transport as a safe alternative to congested road networks.
Economic Multiplier Effects on Riverine Communities
Beyond safety, the economic argument for CVFF-funded vessels is compelling. Millions of Nigerians living in riverine states such as Delta, Bayelsa, Rivers, Anambra, Kogi, Niger, and Cross River depend on waterways not just for daily commuting but for the movement of agricultural produce, fish, timber, and other commodities. The use of substandard boats increases transit times, leads to cargo spoilage, and drives up the cost of goods in these communities. Introducing modern ferry boats with adequate cargo capacity, refrigeration-compatible holds, and faster engines would slash transit times, reduce post-harvest losses, and open these communities to greater market participation. Economists estimate that unlocking inland waterway efficiency in Nigeria could contribute hundreds of billions of naira annually to the national GDP.
Decongestion of Roads and Reducing Carbon Footprint
Nigeria’s road infrastructure is under severe strain. The Lagos-Ibadan Expressway, the East-West Road, and numerous other critical corridors are perpetually gridlocked, costing the economy dearly in lost productivity and fuel consumption. Water transport, by its nature, has a significantly lower carbon footprint per tonne-kilometre compared to road haulage. Investing CVFF funds in standard inland waterway vessels would encourage a modal shift, diverting freight and passengers from overcrowded roads to waterways, thereby easing traffic congestion, reducing road maintenance costs, and contributing to Nigeria’s climate commitments under the Paris Agreement.
Job Creation and Local Capacity Building
The acquisition of standard vessels through the CVFF does not have to be a simple procurement exercise. Done right, it can catalyse an entire ecosystem of economic activity. Nigeria can leverage partnerships with shipbuilding firms — including indigenous yards at Dockyard Apapa and emerging facilities in Port Harcourt — to build or partially assemble these vessels locally. This approach would create thousands of direct and indirect jobs in engineering, fabrication, maritime logistics, and maintenance. Ferry operators trained to handle modern vessels would also gain internationally transferable skills, elevating the professional standards of Nigeria’s waterways workforce.
Tourism and Blue Economy Potential
Nigeria’s rivers, lakes, and creeks are not merely transport corridors — they are untapped tourism goldmines. The scenic beauty of the Niger Delta, the historic significance of the River Niger confluence at Lokoja, and the rich biodiversity of the Oguta Lake and Kainji Lake offer tremendous ecotourism potential that remains largely unexplored. The deployment of modern, comfortable passenger ferries could transform these waterways into tourist attractions, drawing both domestic and international visitors. This aligns directly with Nigeria’s Blue Economy policy agenda, which seeks to harness marine and freshwater resources for sustainable economic development.
Regulatory and Institutional Reforms Must Accompany Funding
Funding alone, however, is not enough. For the CVFF-backed vessel acquisition programme to succeed, it must be accompanied by robust institutional reforms. NIWA and NIMASA must strengthen their enforcement capacity to ensure that all vessels operating on inland waterways meet minimum safety standards. Operators must be mandated to carry adequate life-saving appliances, maintain vessels on scheduled inspection cycles, and obtain proper certification. Jetties and landing points across riverine states must be upgraded to accommodate modern vessels, and channel dredging programmes must be accelerated to ensure year-round navigability. The CVFF investment will only yield its full returns if supported by a well-regulated, professionally managed waterways ecosystem.
A Call to Action
The CVFF was created to grow Nigeria’s indigenous maritime capacity — and there is no more urgent application of that mandate than fixing the country’s dangerously neglected inland waterways. Maritime authorities, the National Assembly, state governments, and the organised private sector must align behind a clear, time-bound programme to deploy CVFF resources for the acquisition and distribution of standard ferry boats across Nigeria’s inland waterway network. The lives of millions of Nigerians who depend on these routes every day demand nothing less. Nigeria’s waterways must become an asset, not a liability — and the CVFF is the most immediate and appropriate tool to make that transformation happen.
Oyetola Woos Turkish Investors for Fisheries Sector, Vows to Protect Artisanal Fishers
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News
The Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Dr Adegboyega Oyetola, has thrown Nigeria’s fisheries sector open to Turkish investment, insisting that any fresh capital coming into the industry must strengthen and not sideline the millions of Nigerians who depend on artisanal fishing for a living.
Oyetola made the pledge while receiving a delegation from Turkish fisheries and aquaculture firm CRD Impex, led by the company’s General Manager for Fisheries, Cem Tarhan, at his Abuja office. He told the investors the Federal Government was ready to create an investment-friendly climate for credible local and foreign players willing to bring capital, technology and modern value-chain solutions to the sector, on condition that such investment remains inclusive.
“We welcome investors who can bring capital, technology, expertise and modern value-chain solutions to the sector. However, investment must be inclusive and sustainable. It must complement and empower our artisanal fish producers, not undermine their livelihoods,” the Minister said
He listed inadequate infrastructure, poor access to modern fishing technology, weak cold-chain systems, limited processing and storage capacity, and gaps in market access as the major constraints holding back the sector, framing each as an opening for targeted investment rather than a dead end.
The Turkish team, which included CRD Impex founder Hanefi Cardak and Tetra Underwater Services founder Ersun Buyukgoze, toured key fisheries and aquaculture points around the country to size up the terrain first-hand. Stops included the Kirikiri Lighter Terminal in Lagos, the Ozumba Mbadiwe Fish Market in Lekki, and the Esuk Nsidung Beach Market, a major waterfront seafood hub in Calabar, Cross River State.
The Ministry described the visit as part of a broader push to attract serious investment into Nigeria’s blue economy while keeping the welfare of artisanal fishers central to that growth.
Nigeria Watch
The Turkish courtesy call lands squarely in the pattern this desk has tracked all year: big-ticket investment pledges for Nigeria’s waterways, paired with familiar assurances that the small operator won’t be crowded out. The test, as always, is what happens after the photo-op.
Nigeria’s artisanal fishing communities occupy the same economic space as the informal boat operators represented by WABOTAN and ATBOWATON, river- and creek-dependent Nigerians whose livelihoods rise or fall on decisions made far from the waterfront. The infrastructure gaps Oyetola cited which include, weak cold-chain systems, poor storage and limited market access, all mirror the exact complaints this desk has documented from inland waterway operators for years but modernisation announced from Abuja rarely reache the jetties.
Turkish capital chasing Nigerian fisheries and aquaculture is a genuinely new thread, distinct from the Strait of Hormuz shipping story or the CVFF disbursement saga this desk has followed closely. But the underlying question is the same one that has defined Oyetola’s tenure at the Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy: will “inclusive investment” translate into contracts, cooperative partnerships and cold-chain infrastructure that artisanal operators can actually use or will it, like so many blue-economy pledges before it, stall at the courtesy-visit stage?
Waterways News will be watching for the first concrete CRD Impex commitment — site, timeline, or local partnership — as the marker of whether this one is different.
NPERA, NPA Open Technical Talks on Handover of Inland Dry Port Functions
By Ighoyota Onaibre | Waterways News
The Nigerian Ports Economic Regulatory Agency (NPERA) and the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) have begun formal engagement on transferring inland dry port oversight to NPERA, marking the start of what both agencies describe as a critical phase in operationalising Nigeria’s new port regulatory framework.
At a management-level meeting between the two agencies, officials focused on the technical groundwork for the handover, chiefly how to draw clear lines of responsibility and avoid duplication among the government bodies with a stake in inland dry port administration.
NPERA’s Director-General/CEO, Dr Akutah Pius, framed the transition as flowing directly from the Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Dr Adegboyega Oyetola, whom he credited with steering the process toward the sector’s broader development. Akutah was emphatic that NPERA could not carry out the transfer alone, and said the buy-in of every relevant stakeholder agency would be needed to see it through.
He indicated that the Ministry would stay central to coordinating the process even as specific mandates move to the agencies best placed to execute them. Akutah also pointed to the Minister’s earlier interventions during the NPERA Bill’s passage through the National Assembly, which he said had defused inter-agency friction and set the stage for the cooperation now underway.
Describing the purpose of the meeting, Akutah said it was meant to formally kick off the transfer of inland dry port responsibilities to NPERA in fulfilment of its statutory role as economic regulator of the ports sector. He singled out Section 51 of the NPERA Act as a provision that now needs to be put into practical effect to keep the transition orderly and ensure stakeholder roles are properly aligned.
To manage the process going forward, the NPERA boss proposed setting up a joint committee drawing in NPERA, NPA, the National Inland Waterways Authority (NIWA), and the Federal Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy. He argued that inland dry ports matter well beyond the coastline. They extend maritime sector benefits into Nigeria’s hinterland and reinforce the country’s trade and logistics chain.
Responding on behalf of NPA, Managing Director Dr Abubakar Dantsoho welcomed the move and pledged his agency’s full operational and technical backing throughout the transition. He said the process had started on the right footing, and that NPA would furnish updated data on the current state of inland dry ports to inform further discussions, expressing confidence that continued engagement would help the agencies meet their shared objectives.
NPA’s Executive Director, Engr. Lekan Badmus, also commended NPERA for setting the collaboration in motion, calling the meeting a solid first step toward a smooth integration. He noted the two agencies have now moved into the technical phase of the exercise, with close attention being paid to eliminating overlapping functions.
Closing the meeting, Akutah said the proposed joint committee would reconvene with the Minister to seek further guidance and agree on next steps to keep the transition on track.
Nigeria Watch
This meeting is the first visible test of whether the NPERA Act’s promise of a rationalised port regulatory architecture can survive contact with Nigeria’s crowded agency landscape. Section 51’s transfer of inland dry port functions to NPERA looks straightforward on paper; in practice, it touches NPA’s traditional port administration turf, NIWA’s inland waterways mandate, and the Ministry’s coordinating role all at once, precisely the kind of overlapping jurisdiction that has bedevilled reform efforts elsewhere in the sector, most visibly in the long-running NIWA-LASWA tussle that only the Supreme Court could settle.
The proposed joint committee of NPERA, NPA, NIWA, and the Ministry, is a sensible mechanism, but Waterways News readers who have followed the CVFF disbursement saga know that Nigerian maritime governance has no shortage of well-designed committees whose outputs never quite reach implementation. What will matter is whether Akutah’s “technical phase” produces a binding timeline, not another round of goodwill statements.
For inland dry port operators and the hinterland trade corridors that depend on them, the stakes are practical: unclear jurisdiction between NPA and NPERA has historically meant slower cargo evacuation, duplicated levies, and uncertainty for freight forwarders planning routes away from the congested Lagos ports. If this transition is handled well, it strengthens the case for dry ports as genuine pressure valves for Apapa and Tin Can. If it stalls in inter-agency turf negotiation, it becomes one more entry in the gap between policy pronouncement and delivery that this desk continues to track.
Worth watching: whether Minister Oyetola’s office sets an explicit deadline when the committee reconvenes, and whether NIWA, whose inland waterways mandate intersects with dry port hinterland connectivity, gets more than a seat at the table.
Two More Tankers Struck in Strait of Hormuz as Attack Count Hits Five in a Week
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News
Two more tankers have been hit while transiting the Strait of Hormuz, leaving two seafarers with minor injuries and pushing the number of reported attacks or security incidents against commercial vessels in the waterway to at least five since 16 September.
The UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) centre said an inbound tanker was struck by an unidentified projectile on Monday. Two crew members sustained minor injuries, but the vessel stayed under its own power and continued to its next port, with no environmental impact reported.
Hours later, UKMTO issued a second alert after an outbound LPG tanker reported being struck by debris from unknown projectiles. All crew were reported safe and the vessel also continued its voyage. Authorities are investigating both incidents, and UKMTO has not attributed either attack to a specific actor.
The two strikes build on a Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC) advisory covering three earlier attacks between 16 and 18 September, one of which saw a tanker’s hull breached by a projectile, sparking a fire. JMIC continues to rate the threat level in the strait as “severe,” citing a high likelihood of deliberate hostile action and pointing to a pattern of harassment by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps — drone overflights, surveillance of merchant vessels and VHF hailing, alongside the direct attacks.
Traffic through the chokepoint remains sharply depressed. Only 17 commodity vessels were visibly transiting over the weekend, down from 37 the week before and against a pre-war daily average of roughly 125. That figure excludes vessels sailing with their AIS transponders switched off, and JMIC notes a persistent gap between visible and actual traffic.
Nigeria Watch
For Nigerian maritime stakeholders, the Hormuz crisis is no longer a distant Gulf story. It is a cost line. Every fresh escalation feeds directly into the war-risk insurance premiums and freight rates that Nigerian importers, refiners and shipping agents ultimately absorb, since global tanker and container capacity pulled off the Hormuz route tightens supply elsewhere and pushes rates up across long-haul trades, including those serving West African ports.
The renewed attacks also sharpen the stakes around Nigeria’s push for a stronger voice at the IMO Council table and its broader blue-economy diplomacy under Minister Adegboyega Oyetola. A sustained Gulf disruption is exactly the kind of systemic shock that tests whether Nigeria’s seat translates into influence over how global shipping risk, insurance and rerouting decisions are made, rather than Nigeria simply absorbing the downstream cost.
Locally, the episode is a reminder of the layered nature of “maritime security” as a policy word: the Deep Blue Project and Gulf of Guinea security architecture address piracy and armed robbery close to home, but Nigeria’s ports and shippers remain exposed to security failures thousands of kilometres away in the Gulf.
Waterways News will continue tracking how the Hormuz situation feeds into freight cost pressure at Nigerian ports and NIMASA’s public messaging on the issue.
Oil and Gas7 months agoTantita’s Pipeline Deal: $144m Contract, Rising Output, and the Questions that Deserve Answers
- MARITIME TRADE & SHIPPING7 months ago
World’s Largest Container Ship Sets New Maritime Record with 22,233 TEUs on Single Voyage
- Blue Economy7 months ago
Nigeria’s Coast Guard Bill: A Solution in Search of a Problem?
