Blue Economy
STAY AFLOAT, GO ROGUE: INSIDE THE “ALARM BLOW” ECONOMY QUIETLY RUNNING NIGERIA’S OFFSHORE WATERS
STAY AFLOAT, GO ROGUE: INSIDE THE “ALARM BLOW” ECONOMY QUIETLY RUNNING NIGERIA’S OFFSHORE WATERS
By Okeoghene Onoriobe| Waterways News
Long before a vessel drops anchor off Lagos, Bonny, Escravos or Warri, another economy is already at work in the water around it with no manifest, no customs entry, and no line in any government ledger, yet moving real cash, real fuel and real goods every day.
Locally, the traders behind it are called “Alarm Blow.” They ride dinghies far out to meet ocean-going vessels, scale rope ladders and makeshift gangways once alongside, and sell seafarers whatever a long stretch at sea has run short of. These include provisions, cigarettes, recharge cards, drinks, spare parts, personal effects. Payment comes in whatever form the moment allows: naira, dollars, or, notably, litres of PMS and AGO drawn off the vessel itself.
There is no license behind any of it, no manifest, no insurance, no safety gear, and in most cases no name that appears in any official register. Yet the trade has persisted for decades, sustained by a seafarer’s need and the absence of anyone else positioned to meet it offshore.
A GAP THE LICENSED SECTOR LEFT OPEN
Nigerian law already assigns this ground to someone: licensed ship chandlers operating under the Customs and Excise (Ship Chandlers) Licensing Regulations are the only parties permitted to trade with vessels and crews offshore. But the country’s chandling industry has spent years arguing that the formal channel has failed to hold its own ground. Industry figures and successive reports have put the annual capital flight from foreign dominance of ship chandling anywhere from $10 billion to $20 billion, with the Nigerian Licensed Ship Chandlers Association and allied bodies blaming outdated 1968-era regulation, high terminal charges, and weak enforcement of the local-content rules that were meant to reserve the bulk of the trade for Nigerians.
Into that gap, the “Alarm Blow” trade has stepped in, unlicensed and unprotected, but far more responsive than the formal sector it has effectively displaced at the water’s edge. Where a licensed chandler is slowed by paperwork, berth charges and terminal bureaucracy, a dinghy trader simply goes to the ship, at whatever hour, with whatever the crew needs.
THE HIDDEN LEDGER: PMS, AGO AND DOLLARS
The most consequential part of this trade is what it is paid in. When cash is scarce mid-voyage, PMS and AGO change hands between vessel and dinghy alongside dollar payments that never touch a Nigerian bank.
That is where informal offshore hawking edges into a far larger and more damaging economy: illegal bunkering and product diversion, which has cost Nigeria billions in lost petroleum revenue over the years. A single “Alarm Blow” trader moves a small volume. But the pattern, unmetered fuel leaving vessels informally, dollar transactions with no audit trail, sits on the same continuum as the crude and product theft crises that have plagued the Niger Delta and the wider Gulf of Guinea.
WHAT COORDINATION COULD UNLOCK
Regulators have historically treated this trade as a security problem to be chased away. Left there, Nigeria loses twice: the economic value already circulating offshore is never captured, and the product-diversion loophole the current chaos enables never closes.
A coordinated model, bringing Alarmblow operators under a recognized cooperative or district structure, along the lines of how NIWA and the Maritime Workers Union of Nigeria (MWUN) already organized commercial boat operators in Lagos, could change that calculus:
Licensing at scale, extending ship-chandling recognition down to small-scale offshore traders instead of reserving it for large firms, clawing back value currently lost to unregulated and often foreign-dominated supply chains.
Traceable transactions, replacing informal PMS/AGO/dollar barter with regulated payment and product-handling protocols, closing off one of the quieter channels through which petroleum products leak from the formal economy.
Safety and welfare protection for dinghy operators who currently work with no life jackets, no vessel certification, and no recourse when accidents happen far from shore — a natural extension of the labour-welfare mandate MWUN already carries for other categories of coastal and inland boat workers.
Foreign exchange formalisation, channelling dollar payments currently occurring invisibly offshore into Nigeria’s formal forex system.
Data and taxation, giving NIMASA, the NPA and state revenue authorities visibility into a trade that today contributes nothing to official statistics despite its scale and staying power.
NIGERIA WATCH
The Alarmblow trade is best read as the ground-level twin of a fight Waterways News has tracked for months: the slow collapse of Nigeria’s licensed ship-chandling sector under foreign dominance and regulatory neglect. If the industry’s own figures are close to right, the country is losing double digits in billions of dollars a year at the formal end of that trade alone — money that a modernised, well-financed chandling sector, properly protected under the Local Content Act, should be capturing instead of ceding to foreign firms.
The dinghy trade is what fills the space that failure leaves behind. It is also a reminder of a theme this desk keeps returning to: Nigeria’s informal waterway economy — the wooden-boat operators, the cooperative associations like WABOTAN and ATBOWATON, the traders who meet a maritime need nobody licensed is meeting — persists not out of defiance but because the formal system has not shown up.
NIWA’s ongoing efforts to formalize and safety-certify small-scale waterway operators, and MWUN’s long-standing welfare mandate for boat workers, both point toward the kind of structure that could absorb the Alarmblow trade rather than merely criminalize it.
The harder question is whether NIMASA, the NPA and the Federal Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy see this as worth the effort. A trade this size, moving in fuel and dollars outside every official ledger, is not a footnote to the bunkering and product-diversion crisis the Gulf of Guinea has wrestled with for years, it is one of its smaller, more visible entry points.
Waterways News will continue tracking how, or whether, policymakers move to bring it into the light.
Oyetola Woos Turkish Investors for Fisheries Sector, Vows to Protect Artisanal Fishers
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News
The Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Dr Adegboyega Oyetola, has thrown Nigeria’s fisheries sector open to Turkish investment, insisting that any fresh capital coming into the industry must strengthen and not sideline the millions of Nigerians who depend on artisanal fishing for a living.
Oyetola made the pledge while receiving a delegation from Turkish fisheries and aquaculture firm CRD Impex, led by the company’s General Manager for Fisheries, Cem Tarhan, at his Abuja office. He told the investors the Federal Government was ready to create an investment-friendly climate for credible local and foreign players willing to bring capital, technology and modern value-chain solutions to the sector, on condition that such investment remains inclusive.
“We welcome investors who can bring capital, technology, expertise and modern value-chain solutions to the sector. However, investment must be inclusive and sustainable. It must complement and empower our artisanal fish producers, not undermine their livelihoods,” the Minister said
He listed inadequate infrastructure, poor access to modern fishing technology, weak cold-chain systems, limited processing and storage capacity, and gaps in market access as the major constraints holding back the sector, framing each as an opening for targeted investment rather than a dead end.
The Turkish team, which included CRD Impex founder Hanefi Cardak and Tetra Underwater Services founder Ersun Buyukgoze, toured key fisheries and aquaculture points around the country to size up the terrain first-hand. Stops included the Kirikiri Lighter Terminal in Lagos, the Ozumba Mbadiwe Fish Market in Lekki, and the Esuk Nsidung Beach Market, a major waterfront seafood hub in Calabar, Cross River State.
The Ministry described the visit as part of a broader push to attract serious investment into Nigeria’s blue economy while keeping the welfare of artisanal fishers central to that growth.
Nigeria Watch
The Turkish courtesy call lands squarely in the pattern this desk has tracked all year: big-ticket investment pledges for Nigeria’s waterways, paired with familiar assurances that the small operator won’t be crowded out. The test, as always, is what happens after the photo-op.
Nigeria’s artisanal fishing communities occupy the same economic space as the informal boat operators represented by WABOTAN and ATBOWATON, river- and creek-dependent Nigerians whose livelihoods rise or fall on decisions made far from the waterfront. The infrastructure gaps Oyetola cited which include, weak cold-chain systems, poor storage and limited market access, all mirror the exact complaints this desk has documented from inland waterway operators for years but modernisation announced from Abuja rarely reache the jetties.
Turkish capital chasing Nigerian fisheries and aquaculture is a genuinely new thread, distinct from the Strait of Hormuz shipping story or the CVFF disbursement saga this desk has followed closely. But the underlying question is the same one that has defined Oyetola’s tenure at the Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy: will “inclusive investment” translate into contracts, cooperative partnerships and cold-chain infrastructure that artisanal operators can actually use or will it, like so many blue-economy pledges before it, stall at the courtesy-visit stage?
Waterways News will be watching for the first concrete CRD Impex commitment — site, timeline, or local partnership — as the marker of whether this one is different.
NPERA, NPA Open Technical Talks on Handover of Inland Dry Port Functions
By Ighoyota Onaibre | Waterways News
The Nigerian Ports Economic Regulatory Agency (NPERA) and the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) have begun formal engagement on transferring inland dry port oversight to NPERA, marking the start of what both agencies describe as a critical phase in operationalising Nigeria’s new port regulatory framework.
At a management-level meeting between the two agencies, officials focused on the technical groundwork for the handover, chiefly how to draw clear lines of responsibility and avoid duplication among the government bodies with a stake in inland dry port administration.
NPERA’s Director-General/CEO, Dr Akutah Pius, framed the transition as flowing directly from the Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Dr Adegboyega Oyetola, whom he credited with steering the process toward the sector’s broader development. Akutah was emphatic that NPERA could not carry out the transfer alone, and said the buy-in of every relevant stakeholder agency would be needed to see it through.
He indicated that the Ministry would stay central to coordinating the process even as specific mandates move to the agencies best placed to execute them. Akutah also pointed to the Minister’s earlier interventions during the NPERA Bill’s passage through the National Assembly, which he said had defused inter-agency friction and set the stage for the cooperation now underway.
Describing the purpose of the meeting, Akutah said it was meant to formally kick off the transfer of inland dry port responsibilities to NPERA in fulfilment of its statutory role as economic regulator of the ports sector. He singled out Section 51 of the NPERA Act as a provision that now needs to be put into practical effect to keep the transition orderly and ensure stakeholder roles are properly aligned.
To manage the process going forward, the NPERA boss proposed setting up a joint committee drawing in NPERA, NPA, the National Inland Waterways Authority (NIWA), and the Federal Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy. He argued that inland dry ports matter well beyond the coastline. They extend maritime sector benefits into Nigeria’s hinterland and reinforce the country’s trade and logistics chain.
Responding on behalf of NPA, Managing Director Dr Abubakar Dantsoho welcomed the move and pledged his agency’s full operational and technical backing throughout the transition. He said the process had started on the right footing, and that NPA would furnish updated data on the current state of inland dry ports to inform further discussions, expressing confidence that continued engagement would help the agencies meet their shared objectives.
NPA’s Executive Director, Engr. Lekan Badmus, also commended NPERA for setting the collaboration in motion, calling the meeting a solid first step toward a smooth integration. He noted the two agencies have now moved into the technical phase of the exercise, with close attention being paid to eliminating overlapping functions.
Closing the meeting, Akutah said the proposed joint committee would reconvene with the Minister to seek further guidance and agree on next steps to keep the transition on track.
Nigeria Watch
This meeting is the first visible test of whether the NPERA Act’s promise of a rationalised port regulatory architecture can survive contact with Nigeria’s crowded agency landscape. Section 51’s transfer of inland dry port functions to NPERA looks straightforward on paper; in practice, it touches NPA’s traditional port administration turf, NIWA’s inland waterways mandate, and the Ministry’s coordinating role all at once, precisely the kind of overlapping jurisdiction that has bedevilled reform efforts elsewhere in the sector, most visibly in the long-running NIWA-LASWA tussle that only the Supreme Court could settle.
The proposed joint committee of NPERA, NPA, NIWA, and the Ministry, is a sensible mechanism, but Waterways News readers who have followed the CVFF disbursement saga know that Nigerian maritime governance has no shortage of well-designed committees whose outputs never quite reach implementation. What will matter is whether Akutah’s “technical phase” produces a binding timeline, not another round of goodwill statements.
For inland dry port operators and the hinterland trade corridors that depend on them, the stakes are practical: unclear jurisdiction between NPA and NPERA has historically meant slower cargo evacuation, duplicated levies, and uncertainty for freight forwarders planning routes away from the congested Lagos ports. If this transition is handled well, it strengthens the case for dry ports as genuine pressure valves for Apapa and Tin Can. If it stalls in inter-agency turf negotiation, it becomes one more entry in the gap between policy pronouncement and delivery that this desk continues to track.
Worth watching: whether Minister Oyetola’s office sets an explicit deadline when the committee reconvenes, and whether NIWA, whose inland waterways mandate intersects with dry port hinterland connectivity, gets more than a seat at the table.
Two More Tankers Struck in Strait of Hormuz as Attack Count Hits Five in a Week
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News
Two more tankers have been hit while transiting the Strait of Hormuz, leaving two seafarers with minor injuries and pushing the number of reported attacks or security incidents against commercial vessels in the waterway to at least five since 16 September.
The UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) centre said an inbound tanker was struck by an unidentified projectile on Monday. Two crew members sustained minor injuries, but the vessel stayed under its own power and continued to its next port, with no environmental impact reported.
Hours later, UKMTO issued a second alert after an outbound LPG tanker reported being struck by debris from unknown projectiles. All crew were reported safe and the vessel also continued its voyage. Authorities are investigating both incidents, and UKMTO has not attributed either attack to a specific actor.
The two strikes build on a Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC) advisory covering three earlier attacks between 16 and 18 September, one of which saw a tanker’s hull breached by a projectile, sparking a fire. JMIC continues to rate the threat level in the strait as “severe,” citing a high likelihood of deliberate hostile action and pointing to a pattern of harassment by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps — drone overflights, surveillance of merchant vessels and VHF hailing, alongside the direct attacks.
Traffic through the chokepoint remains sharply depressed. Only 17 commodity vessels were visibly transiting over the weekend, down from 37 the week before and against a pre-war daily average of roughly 125. That figure excludes vessels sailing with their AIS transponders switched off, and JMIC notes a persistent gap between visible and actual traffic.
Nigeria Watch
For Nigerian maritime stakeholders, the Hormuz crisis is no longer a distant Gulf story. It is a cost line. Every fresh escalation feeds directly into the war-risk insurance premiums and freight rates that Nigerian importers, refiners and shipping agents ultimately absorb, since global tanker and container capacity pulled off the Hormuz route tightens supply elsewhere and pushes rates up across long-haul trades, including those serving West African ports.
The renewed attacks also sharpen the stakes around Nigeria’s push for a stronger voice at the IMO Council table and its broader blue-economy diplomacy under Minister Adegboyega Oyetola. A sustained Gulf disruption is exactly the kind of systemic shock that tests whether Nigeria’s seat translates into influence over how global shipping risk, insurance and rerouting decisions are made, rather than Nigeria simply absorbing the downstream cost.
Locally, the episode is a reminder of the layered nature of “maritime security” as a policy word: the Deep Blue Project and Gulf of Guinea security architecture address piracy and armed robbery close to home, but Nigeria’s ports and shippers remain exposed to security failures thousands of kilometres away in the Gulf.
Waterways News will continue tracking how the Hormuz situation feeds into freight cost pressure at Nigerian ports and NIMASA’s public messaging on the issue.
Oil and Gas7 months agoTantita’s Pipeline Deal: $144m Contract, Rising Output, and the Questions that Deserve Answers
- MARITIME TRADE & SHIPPING7 months ago
World’s Largest Container Ship Sets New Maritime Record with 22,233 TEUs on Single Voyage
- Blue Economy7 months ago
Nigeria’s Coast Guard Bill: A Solution in Search of a Problem?
