Blue Economy
WABOTAN President Raises Alarm Over Prohibitive Water Transport Fares, Urges Government Intervention
WABOTAN President Raises Alarm Over Prohibitive Water Transport Fares, Urges Government Intervention
Fajemirokun warns that rising fuel costs, ageing vessels, and inadequate public investment are pricing commuters off Nigeria’s waterways
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News Correspondent
The President of the Waterfront Boat Owners and Transporters Association of Nigeria (WABOTAN), Mr. Tope Fajemirokun, has raised the alarm over the prohibitively high cost of water transportation across Nigeria, warning that unless governments at all levels intervene decisively, the sector will continue to haemorrhage passengers to road transport despite the obvious advantages of the nation’s extensive waterway network. Fajemirokun made the remarks during a live radio broadcast in Lagos, where he painted a stark picture of the economic burden borne by waterway commuters.
Fares Outpacing Road Transport
At the heart of his concern is a cost paradox that should trouble any serious maritime policy observer: water transport, which by its very nature should offer a cheaper and faster alternative to gridlocked Nigerian roads, is in many corridors costing passengers more than the road equivalent. Fajemirokun cited the Badagry-to-CMS run as a telling example, noting that a commuter on that route parts with approximately ₦5,000 per trip each way — amounting to ₦10,000 daily on transportation alone.
“This is one of the major factors discouraging passengers from using the waterways. That is why we are appealing to government at all levels to invest more in the sector,” he said.
Fuel Costs Strangling Operators
Beyond passenger fares, Fajemirokun identified soaring fuel prices as a primary driver of the sector’s operational distress. The post-subsidy-removal fuel environment has dramatically inflated running costs for boat operators, many of whom are already working at the margins of viability. The knock-on effect, he explained, is that operators are increasingly unable to reinvest in their fleets or expand capacity — a vicious cycle that keeps vessel quality low, fares high, and passenger volumes depressed.
“When you are in business, you must continue to improve and invest in it despite the challenges,” he said, acknowledging the burden while calling on government to cushion it through targeted support and soft loans to enable operators to acquire modern, fuel-efficient vessels.
Safety Preparedness as the Rains Arrive
WABOTAN’s president also used the platform to outline the association’s safety readiness agenda as Nigeria enters the rainy season — historically the most hazardous period on the nation’s waterways. He disclosed that WABOTAN had already conducted two safety induction programmes in 2026, with a third planned before August, to be convened in partnership with veteran maritime journalist Frank Meke and involving stakeholders, media, and regulatory agencies.
Fajemirokun commended both the Lagos State Waterways Authority (LASWA) and the National Inland Waterway Authority (NIWA) for their collaborative engagement with the association, noting that LASWA’s recent investment in clearing water hyacinth from Lagos waterways was a significant operational safety intervention.
He expressed particular concern about Rivers and Bayelsa States, where proximity to the Atlantic Ocean creates elevated hazard conditions during the rainy season, and said WABOTAN was intensifying sensitisation efforts in those states with NIWA’s support.
On the perennial issue of unsafe banana and wooden boats, Fajemirokun renewed his call for government financial intervention to help operators transition to sturdier, more modern vessels. “Eliminating banana and wooden boats will be easier if government provides the necessary support and investment,” he said. He also commended the Lagos State Government for its ongoing intervention in the sector as a model for other state governments to emulate.
Meke: ‘More Lip Service Than Concrete Action’
Veteran maritime journalist Frank Meke, who also addressed the broadcast, echoed Fajemirokun’s concerns with characteristic directness, contrasting the obvious congestion on Nigerian roads — pointing specifically to the perennial Apapa gridlock — with what he described as insufficiently backed government rhetoric on waterways development.
“Sometimes, there appears to be more lip service than concrete action. The blue economy holds enormous potential,” Meke said, praising WABOTAN for the investments and sacrifices it makes within its resource constraints, while challenging government agencies to demonstrate comparable commitment.
Meke also expanded the geographic lens of the debate, flagging landlocked and riverine states including Kwara, Niger, Benue, and Taraba as jurisdictions where functional inland waterway services could transform the economics of agricultural logistics — providing farmers with cost-effective, reliable means of moving produce to market. He called on the federal government to declare a state of emergency in the water transportation sector, and for soft loans to be made available to operators for vessel acquisition and crew training.
Both speakers agreed on one non-negotiable: life jackets must be worn on every journey, every time, without exception.
Nigeria Watch: Analysis by Waterways News
The concerns voiced by Mr. Fajemirokun and Frank Meke on that Lagos radio programme are neither new nor unfamiliar to this publication’s readers. What is striking, however, is how little has changed in the structural condition of Nigeria’s inland and coastal passenger waterway sector despite years of advocacy from operators and industry voices.
The ₦10,000 daily transport bill on the Badagry-CMS corridor is not merely an inconvenience — it is a market failure signal. Water transport along that axis should, by any rational calculation, be the cheaper and faster option. The fact that it is not speaks to a fundamental absence of the economies of scale that only sustained public investment, modern fleet deployment, and subsidised infrastructure can generate.
WABOTAN’s operators are caught in a trap familiar to many sectors of Nigeria’s economy: the cost of inputs — fuel, maintenance, insurance, compliance — has surged dramatically in the post-subsidy-removal environment, but passenger affordability has not kept pace. The result is an affordability ceiling that suppresses ridership, keeps revenues thin, and starves operators of the capital needed for fleet renewal. Ageing wooden and banana boats are not just a safety hazard; they are the rational economic response of an operator who cannot access affordable credit to do better.
This publication notes that the federal government’s April 2026 approval of the long-delayed CVFF disbursement was a step in the right direction, but the Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund was designed primarily for deep-sea and coastal commercial shipping — not for the community-level passenger boat operators that WABOTAN represents. What the inland and passenger waterway sub-sector requires is a dedicated, purpose-designed financing window, with concessional interest rates and simplified access procedures, that speaks directly to the scale and the needs of small and medium-sized waterway operators.
Frank Meke’s invocation of Kwara, Niger, Benue, and Taraba is timely. Nigeria’s waterway potential is habitually discussed in the context of Lagos and the Niger Delta, but the country’s network of navigable rivers — the Niger, the Benue, the Kaduna tributary system — represents an enormous untapped logistics asset for agricultural value chains in the Middle Belt and North Central zones. The failure to activate this network is not merely a transport policy failure; it is an agricultural competitiveness failure with direct consequences for food security and rural income.
As the 2026 rainy season deepens, WABOTAN’s renewed focus on safety education is commendable. But it should not be left to an industry association, operating on voluntary resources, to carry the primary burden of waterway safety sensitisation. NIWA, LASWA, and the Federal Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy must resource and lead that function — not merely partner with it from the margins.
By Raymond | Waterways News | Lagos
waterwaysnews.ng
Blue Economy
Water Transport Operators Push For Recognition At The Table As FTAN Demands Tourism Policy Reforms
Water Transport Operators Push For Recognition At The Table As FTAN Demands Tourism Policy Reforms
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News
Nigeria’s tourism sector needs urgent policy reform, stronger collaboration and fresh investment to compete globally and water transport operators who are members of the Federation of Tourism Associations of Nigeria (FTAN) want that conversation to include the boats, ferries and waterway routes that move millions of Nigerians and could move even more tourists.
That was the underlying idea raised by Comrade Babatope Fajemirokun National President of Waterfront Boat Owners and Transporters Association of Nigeria (WABOTAN) represented by Chief Raymond Gold, National PRO of WABOTAN, at the ninth Nigeria Tourism Investors Forum and Exhibition (NTIFE), held over two days in Abuja under the theme “Tourism Transformation Through Collaboration, Policy Alignment and Investment.” The events took place between Thursday 30 to Friday 31 of July 2026. Waterfront Boat Owners and Transporters Association of Nigeria (WABOTAN), is a corporate member of FTAN
The forum drew policymakers, investors, tourism operators and development partners.
FTAN President Dr Aliyu Badaki used his welcome remarks to press the Federal Government to overhaul tourism-related laws and regulatory frameworks that he said breed duplication, institutional conflict and legal uncertainty for operators. He said the federation’s newly developed Tourism Transformation Mandate (TTM) is meant to unify every segment of the tourism value chain.
Babatope Fajemirokun, through Chief Gold emphasizes the fact that this value chain for Nigeria’s coastal cities, riverine communities and inland waterway corridors, runs directly through water transport.
Badaki argued that fragmented efforts and weak coordination have held back the sector for years, and called for regulation that enables rather than inhibits growth.
Minister of Art, Culture, Tourism and Creative Economy, Hannatu Musawa, who declared the forum open, described tourism as a strategic pillar for economic diversification. She said government cannot finance tourism transformation alone and that private capital must lead, with government’s role limited to creating an enabling environment for investors.
In his keynote address, Sen. Ibrahim Ida called for stronger collaboration among government, the private sector and host communities, saying tourism can generate jobs, foreign exchange and diversification if properly harnessed.
Panel sessions, moderated by Justina Ovat of Calabar Hospitality House Limited, featured Nigeria Tourism Development Authority (NTDA) Director-General Dr Ola Awakan, who called for policy consistency and investor-friendly incentives, and Dr Philip Maga of the National Institute for Hospitality and Tourism (NIHOTOUR), who flagged the need for stronger workforce training to close skills gaps across the hospitality industry.
Hospitality entrepreneur Lanre Balogun urged investors to prioritise disciplined, long-term planning.
Nigeria Watch
For Nigeria’s water transport sector, NTIFE’s reform push is not a side conversation. Rather, it is a direct stakeholder issue. FTAN’s corporate membership includes Waterfront Boat Owners and Transporters Association of Nigeria (WABOTAN) and the Association of Tourist Boat Operators and Water Transporters of Nigeria (ATBOWATON), both drawn from the ranks of operators who run the boats, ferries and water taxis that already serve Lagos’s creeks, the Niger Delta’s riverine towns and coastal leisure routes. Their presence inside FTAN means the federation’s demand for regulatory clarity and coordinated policy carries an inland-waterways and blue-economy dimension that goes beyond hotels and heritage sites.
That matters because water tourism sits at an awkward regulatory junction in Nigeria. A tourist boat operator answers not only to tourism authorities but potentially to NIWA, LASWA (in Lagos) and NIMASA on safety standards, and state government tourism boards, precisely the kind of overlapping jurisdiction Badaki described as breeding “duplication, institutional conflicts… and operational uncertainty.”
The 2026 Supreme Court ruling affirming NIWA’s regulatory authority over inland waterways nationwide, following the NIWA-LASWA jurisdictional dispute, is a live example of the kind of institutional friction FTAN’s Tourism Transformation Mandate is meant to resolve, at least on the tourism side.
Musawa’s call for private capital to lead tourism investment also lands squarely on water transport operators’ desks. Vessel acquisition, safety retrofitting, jetty infrastructure and life-jacket compliance all require capital that small-scale operators, including WABOTAN’s member-cooperative structure, have struggled to access, a gap that echoes the long-running CVFF disbursement failure in the cabotage shipping sector and underscores why financing bottlenecks are not unique to cargo and passenger shipping alone.
If FTAN’s push for policy alignment succeeds in drawing water transport formally into Nigeria’s tourism investment architecture, operators like WABOTAN and ATBOWATON could gain a stronger claim to inclusion in infrastructure programmes such as the Omi-Eko electric ferry project and LASWA’s ferry safety development initiatives, turning routine commuter water transport into a recognised leisure and tourism asset, not just a transportation afterthought.
For a sector accustomed to being regulated but rarely consulted, this call by Babatope Fajemirokun is a modest but meaningful call.
Blue Economy
NIMASA Deepens Seafarer Welfare Push, Signs Off Renewed Mission to Seafarers Collaboration
NIMASA Deepens Seafarer Welfare Push, Signs Off Renewed Mission to Seafarers Collaboration
By Ighoyota Onaibre | Waterways News
The Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) has restated its commitment to improving the welfare of Nigerian seafarers, pledging deeper collaboration with the Mission to Seafarers (MtS) as part of ongoing reforms in the sector.
The commitment came as the Director-General, Dr Dayo Mobereola, received a delegation from the Mission to Seafarers at the agency’s Lagos headquarters, led by the Chairman of MtS Lagos, Chief Adebayo Sarumi, alongside the Regional Director for Africa, Reverend Cedric Rautenbach.
Speaking on behalf of the DG, NIMASA’s Executive Director for Operations, Engr. Fatai Taiye Adeyemi, said the agency would continue tightening certification processes, expanding capacity development programmes, and strengthening welfare policies for seafarers both at sea and in port, in partnership with stakeholders such as the Mission to Seafarers.
Chief Sarumi commended NIMASA’s ongoing reforms and expressed confidence that closer collaboration would translate into tangible welfare gains for Nigerian maritime professionals. Reverend Rautenbach, for his part, clarified that while the Mission to Seafarers and Nigeria’s Port Welfare Committees pursue a shared objective which is the the wellbeing of seafarers. The two bodies operate on distinct, complementary mandates, making coordination between them essential to strengthening on-ground support at Nigerian ports.
The meeting covered decent working conditions, welfare service gaps, and areas of mutual collaboration. NIMASA said the engagement aligns with its obligations under the Maritime Labour Convention (MLC) 2006, and forms part of a broader push toward stronger regulatory oversight and stakeholder engagement on seafarer rights.
Nigeria Watch
Beyond the courtesy-visit optics, this meeting lands on a fault line that has dogged Nigerian seafarer welfare for years: fragmented institutional responsibility. NIMASA regulates and certifies; Port Welfare Committees are meant to deliver frontline services at berths; the Mission to Seafarers, a faith-based international NGO, fills gaps neither statutory body always reaches. These gaps are chaplaincy, shore leave support, emergency assistance, and advocacy for stranded or abandoned crew.
Rautenbach’s point about “distinct but complementary mandates” is worth pressing on, because in practice that distinction has often meant duplication in some areas and total absence in others.
Nigerian seafarers have long reported patchy access to welfare facilities at ports like Apapa, Tin Can Island, and Onne. Such reports include inconsistent internet access, poor rest facilities, and slow response to cases of wage default or abandonment by errant shipowners, issues MWUN has repeatedly raised in past CBA compliance disputes.
NIMASA’s MLC 2006 framing is the right one, but enforcement, not policy language, remains the industry’s persistent complaint. If this renewed MtS partnership is to mean more than another photo-op at headquarters, it should translate into a documented, port-by-port welfare service map: which ports have functioning seafarer centres, which Port Welfare Committees are actually active, and where the Mission to Seafarers’ Flying Angel network is present versus where seafarers are effectively on their own.
Nigerian crews calling at their own national ports deserve better than welfare support that depends on which NGO happens to be in town.
NIMASA Bets on Youths to Power Nigeria’s Blue Giant Ambitions
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News
The Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) has restated that the country’s push to become Africa’s “Blue Giant” will rise or fall on how well it equips young Nigerians for the blue economy, with the agency’s Director-General, Dr Dayo Mobereola, describing youth capacity-building as the engine room of the National Marine and Blue Economy Policy.
Mobereola made the point at the 10th Taiwo Afolabi Annual Maritime (TAAM) Lecture at the University of Lagos, where he was represented by NIMASA’s Director of Reforms Coordination and Blue Economy, Mrs Nneka Obianyor. He linked the agency’s youth agenda directly to President Bola Tinubu’s economic diversification drive, noting that the Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Adegboyega Oyetola, has directed NIMASA to prioritise skills development and job creation for young Nigerians in the sector.
Director-General of NIMASA, Dr. Dayo Mobereola
To back that up, Mobereola pointed to a cluster of NIMASA programmes already running: the long-standing Nigerian Seafarers Development Programme (NSDP), a newly launched Blue Economy Accelerator Initiative, skills acquisition centres spread across the six geopolitical zones, and the rollout of Institutes of Maritime Studies in select Nigerian universities. He framed these as deliberate interventions meant to build capacity, generate employment, and spur innovation among the country’s youth population.
Separately, NIMASA used the UNILAG engagement to go beyond ceremony, running an interactive session with doctoral and master’s students on shipping development, maritime logistics, cabotage implementation, and maritime labour regulation. The session was led by the agency’s Director of Cabotage Services, Ms Gloria Anyasodo, and was pitched as part of a broader effort to strengthen ties between academia and industry in tackling the maritime sector’s practical challenges.
Nigeria Watch
The optics are good; the test, as always, will be delivery. NIMASA has no shortage of youth-facing initiatives on paper. The NSDP has existed for years, skills centres have been announced before, and Institutes of Maritime Studies have been floated in past budget cycles. What’s new here is the Blue Economy Accelerator Initiative, and it arrives with the same vagueness that has dogged similar rollouts: no disclosed funding envelope, no timeline for the six geopolitical zone centres to be fully operational, and no public framework for how graduates of these programmes are absorbed into shipping, logistics, or cabotage jobs afterward.
That absorption question matters more than any lecture-hall soundbite. Nigeria’s maritime training pipeline, from MAN Oron to the seafarer certification backlog that this publication has tracked, already produces more qualified hands than the domestic fleet and port ecosystem can currently employ. This is a mismatch tied directly to the Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund’s decades-long disbursement failure and the slow pace of indigenous vessel acquisition. Training more youths without fixing that bottleneck simply shifts the frustration downstream, from unemployment to underemployment.
There’s also an accountability gap in how these announcements are made. They are usually made through a lecture delegation rather than a costed policy document. If NIMASA and the Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy are serious about youths driving the Blue Giant ambition, the next disclosure should include enrolment numbers, the accelerator’s funding source, and most critically, the placement data showing how many NSDP and skills-centre graduates have actually found sea-time or shore-based maritime employment. Until then, this remains a well-intentioned promise stacked on top of several older, still-unfulfilled promises.
Oil and Gas5 months agoTantita’s Pipeline Deal: $144m Contract, Rising Output, and the Questions that Deserve Answers
- MARITIME TRADE & SHIPPING5 months ago
World’s Largest Container Ship Sets New Maritime Record with 22,233 TEUs on Single Voyage
- Blue Economy6 months ago
Nigeria’s Coast Guard Bill: A Solution in Search of a Problem?
