Breaking News
Hormuz Seafarers Evacuation Suspended as Vessel Attack Halts IMO Operation

Hormuz Seafarers Evacuation Suspended as Vessel Attack Halts IMO Operation
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News
The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has temporarily suspended its ongoing evacuation of approximately 11,000 mariners stranded in and around the Strait of Hormuz following an attack on a cargo vessel in the Gulf of Oman on Thursday, June 25, 2026.
The UN’s maritime agency had earlier in the week commenced the phased evacuation of some 600 ships and their crews after Washington and Tehran reached a preliminary ceasefire understanding to halt their conflict. The operation, which began on Tuesday evening, was designed to guide trapped vessels safely through the strait under an internationally supervised framework.
However, the evacuation was brought to a sudden halt after an unidentified projectile struck a cargo ship operating off the Omani coast. The vessel, the UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) confirmed, suffered damage to its bridge but no crew casualties were reported.
IMO Secretary-General Arsenio Dominguez announced the pause in a formal statement, saying he had taken the decision in order to reconfirm that the necessary safety guarantees remain in place for ships listed under the evacuation programme and for all other vessels in the region. He clarified that the attacked vessel was not travelling under the IMO’s evacuation framework.
Data from maritime analytics firm Kpler indicated that 70 confirmed crossings of the Strait of Hormuz were recorded on Wednesday, though traffic through the strategic waterway remains at roughly half its pre-war volume.
Iran’s Persian Gulf Strait Authority issued a warning on the same day, stating that vessels using routes outside the designated evacuation framework would not be entitled to safe passage guarantees. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards went further, warning that any ships transiting the strait without authorisation would face consequences.
NIGERIA WATCH
The suspension of the Hormuz seafarer evacuation is a stark reminder that the conflict’s threat to global maritime trade — and to Nigerian interests in particular — is far from over.
For Nigeria, the stakes are direct and measurable. Nigerian seafarers are among the thousands of mariners caught in the strait’s standoff, and NIMASA’s ongoing engagement on their welfare and repatriation remains critical. The Agency must continue to press through diplomatic and IMO channels for the protection of Nigerian crew members aboard vessels stranded in the conflict zone, especially now that evacuation timelines have become uncertain.
Beyond crew welfare, the disruption carries serious freight and energy market implications for Nigeria. The Strait of Hormuz remains the world’s single most important oil chokepoint, through which a significant share of global crude oil and LPG shipments transit. Any prolonged disruption has historically transmitted directly into global oil price volatility — a dynamic that simultaneously affects Nigeria’s oil export revenues and the landed cost of petroleum products being re-imported at a time when domestic refining capacity, though growing with the Dangote Refinery’s ramp-up, has not yet fully decoupled Nigeria from global oil price swings.
Nigerian freight forwarders, importers dependent on Asian supply chains, and terminal operators at Apapa, Tin Can Island, and the Lekki Deep Sea Port are equally exposed. With traffic through Hormuz still at only about half its pre-war level, shipping delays, vessel diversions, and rising war risk insurance premiums continue to push up freight rates on routes that touch Nigeria’s import-heavy economy.
The IMO’s credibility as an honest broker in this crisis is also on the line. Nigeria, as a significant maritime nation and IMO member state, should be using its voice at the Agency to advocate for a durable safety framework — not just a pause-and-resume evacuation arrangement vulnerable to the next incident. NIMASA and the Federal Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy must ensure Nigeria is not a passive observer in these proceedings but an active participant in shaping the multilateral response.
Until genuine security guarantees are established and sustained across the strait, every resumed convoy risks another suspension — and with each delay, Nigerian mariners, cargo, and trade revenues remain at the mercy of a conflict that shows no sign of swift resolution.
Waterways News | Maritime & Blue Economy Desk
Breaking News
Court Convicts 11 Indian Sailors, Slaps $6m Fine on Vessel Over Apapa Cocaine Bust

Court Convicts 11 Indian Sailors, Slaps $6m Fine on Vessel Over Apapa Cocaine Bust
By Ighoyota Onaibre | Waterways News
A Federal High Court sitting in Lagos has convicted eleven Indian seafarers and their merchant vessel in connection with the trafficking of cocaine through Apapa port, ordering financial penalties that total approximately $6 million — in what is one of the most significant maritime drug prosecution outcomes recorded at Nigeria’s busiest port complex.
The National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) confirmed the conviction on Thursday, disclosing that the crew of MV Aruna Hulya were arrested on 2 January after agency operatives discovered 31.5 kilogrammes of cocaine concealed within a storage compartment aboard the vessel while it was berthed at Apapa.
The ship’s captain, Sharma Shashi Bhushan, and ten other Indian nationals were arraigned following the discovery. In its ruling, the court convicted all twelve defendants — the eleven crew members and the vessel itself — under Nigeria’s anti-narcotic laws. The inclusion of the vessel as a defendant and convict reflects provisions under Nigerian law that allow ships used to transport illicit substances to be prosecuted and subjected to financial sanction or forfeiture.
The penalty structure was graduated by rank. Each crew member was ordered to pay a fine of ₦100,000. Three senior officers aboard were additionally fined $100,000 each, while the remaining sailors were assessed at $50,000 each. The vessel itself was directed to pay $5.3 million in restitution to the Nigerian government — the single largest component of the total penalty. Should the shipowner fail to settle that sum, the court ordered that MV Aruna Hulya be auctioned to satisfy the judgment debt.
NDLEA Chairman, Mohammed Buba Marwa, said the verdict delivers an unambiguous message to international drug trafficking networks that Nigeria’s ports will no longer be treated as permissive transit corridors for illicit cargo.
A spokesperson for the agency noted that the defendants had agreed to the terms of the conviction, which was subsequently presented to the court for formal endorsement.
Nigeria Watch
The conviction of MV Aruna Hulya’s crew and the accompanying vessel fine carry implications that extend well beyond the courtroom — touching on port security architecture, shipowner liability, and Nigeria’s standing within the international maritime compliance community.
For port operators and terminal managers at Apapa, the case reinforces the operational reality that narcotics concealment within commercial vessels remains an active and persistent threat.
The January arrest came during routine NDLEA enforcement activity at the port, underlining the importance of sustained inter-agency collaboration between the drug agency, the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA), the Nigerian Customs Service, and the Nigerian Navy’s Forward Operating Base in Lagos.
The vessel prosecution angle deserves particular attention from shipowners, charterers, and their insurers. Nigerian law’s provision to try a vessel as a defendant — and to proceed to auction if the owner cannot meet the restitution order — amounts to a form of strict liability that places the financial burden squarely on principals, not just crew. P&I clubs and ship managers operating vessels that call at Nigerian ports would be advised to review crew vetting procedures and cargo security protocols in light of this judgment.
From a regulatory standpoint, the case also speaks to Nigeria’s broader effort to reposition Lagos — and by extension its port cluster — as a credible, enforcement-active maritime hub rather than a soft entry point for illicit trade. The Federal Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy and NIMASA have both emphasised port security as a pillar of Nigeria’s maritime governance agenda, and high-profile prosecutions of this nature serve as practical demonstrations of that commitment to international partners and flag states alike.
The $5.3 million restitution order against the ship is also notable as a revenue-generating enforcement instrument. If the vessel is ultimately auctioned, the proceeds flow to the Nigerian government — a financial deterrent that may register more sharply with shipowners than custodial sentences imposed on crew alone.
Waterways News | Maritime | Ports | Shipping | Blue Economy
Blue Economy
China Harbour Engineers Begin Feasibility Survey for Proposed Obeaku Seaport, Raising Hopes for South-East Maritime Corridor

China Harbour Engineers Begin Feasibility Survey for Proposed Obeaku Seaport, Raising Hopes for South-East Maritime Corridor
Technical team conducts bathymetric and hydrographic studies in Ukwa East as Abia State pushes to unlock inland port potential
By Onyinyechi Anoweh | Waterways News Correspondent | Aba, Abia State
A technical delegation from China Harbour Engineering Company Limited (CHEC), one of China’s foremost marine infrastructure and port construction firms, has formally commenced feasibility and hydrographic surveys for the long-proposed Obeaku Seaport in Abia State, in what state officials are describing as a defining moment for maritime development in Nigeria’s South-East geopolitical zone.
The survey team, accompanied by senior Abia State Government officials, visited the Ukwa East Local Government Area — the proposed site of the facility — to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the waterways in the area. Activities carried out during the inspection included bathymetric studies to determine water depths, navigational surveys to evaluate vessel access corridors, and environmental and hydrological assessments aimed at establishing the technical viability of developing a functional seaport at the location.
Community Backs Project, Donates Over 2,000 Plots of Land
The survey team was received by the traditional ruler of the host community, the Aku of Obeaku Kingdom, His Royal Highness Eze Ikeagwuchi Ekeke, who used the occasion to reaffirm the community’s unequivocal support for the project. Eze Ekeke disclosed that the Obeaku community has already donated in excess of 2,000 plots of land towards the project’s footprint — a gesture he described as a demonstration of the community’s commitment to seeing the port realised.
The monarch also raised a point of identity that carries broader symbolic weight: he insisted that the facility be officially designated as “Obeaku Seaport,” rather than “Azumini-Obeaku Seaport,” arguing that the naming should reflect the primary host community and affirm the people’s enduring stake in the project’s legacy.
Officials Hail Survey as Strategic Milestone
Abia State Government officials who accompanied the CHEC delegation characterised the commencement of the survey as a critical milestone in a project that has long featured in the state’s economic development aspirations. They noted that a commercially viable seaport at Obeaku would significantly stimulate economic activity across the state, generate employment across logistics, trade, and ancillary maritime services, and — crucially — position Abia State as a gateway hub for maritime commerce in the South-East.
The officials expressed confidence that the feasibility findings would validate the project’s commercial logic and accelerate movement towards the financing and construction phases.
Nigeria Watch
The proposed Obeaku Seaport, if brought to fruition, would represent a significant addition to Nigeria’s emerging inland and coastal port network — and a rare maritime infrastructure breakthrough for the South-East, a region that has historically been underserved by port and logistics infrastructure despite its commercial density and trade volumes.
China Harbour Engineering Company is no stranger to major Nigerian port projects. The firm has been involved in terminal and waterway infrastructure work across West Africa, and its presence here signals that the Abia State initiative is attracting serious commercial attention rather than remaining a political aspiration.
However, Nigeria’s port development landscape is littered with projects that completed feasibility stages without progressing to execution. The more consequential questions — who finances construction, on what terms, and under what regulatory framework — remain unanswered.
The Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) and the Federal Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy will need to be closely involved if the project is to advance through licensing, environmental impact assessment, and port concession processes.
For Nigeria’s inland waterways sector, the survey also raises the question of dredging and navigational maintenance along the rivers feeding the proposed facility — a domain where the National Inland Waterways Authority (NIWA) plays a central role. Sustained navigability will be as important as the port structure itself.
Waterways News will continue to monitor this project.
Oil and Gas5 months agoTantita’s Pipeline Deal: $144m Contract, Rising Output, and the Questions that Deserve Answers
MARITIME TRADE & SHIPPING5 months agoWorld’s Largest Container Ship Sets New Maritime Record with 22,233 TEUs on Single Voyage
Blue Economy6 months agoNigeria’s Coast Guard Bill: A Solution in Search of a Problem?




