Blue Economy
China Cements Shipbuilding Dominance; Sets New Maritime Benchmark with World’s Largest Car Carrier
China Cements Shipbuilding Dominance; Sets New Maritime Benchmark with World’s Largest Car Carrier
Glovis Leader’s delivery signals shifting tides in global auto transport and green shipping
The global maritime industry has a new crown jewel. The Glovis Leader, a car carrier with a maximum capacity of 10,800 car equivalent units (CEU), was formally delivered on Tuesday in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou — officially making it the largest vessel of its kind anywhere in the world.
The handover ceremony, held at the Nansha district shipyard in Guangzhou, marked a significant moment not just for the companies involved, but for the entire seaborne vehicle transport industry. Measuring 230 metres in length and 40 metres in width, and spread across 14 dedicated vehicle decks, the Glovis Leader was constructed by two firms — Guangzhou Shipyard International Company Limited, a subsidiary of the China State Shipbuilding Corporation (CSSC), and China Shipbuilding Trading Co., Ltd.
To appreciate the sheer scale of the vessel, consider this: if all the standard-sized five-metre cars the Glovis Leader can carry were arranged bumper-to-bumper in a straight line, they would stretch over 50 kilometres. And if fully loaded with vehicles priced at a conservative 100,000 yuan each, the total cargo value would exceed one billion yuan.
A New Era for Auto Shipping
The vessel was delivered to HMM, a leading South Korean shipping company, and will subsequently be operated by Hyundai Glovis Co., Ltd., a logistics firm also based in the Republic of Korea.
Speaking at the delivery ceremony, Lee Kyoo-bok, CEO of Hyundai Glovis, described the Glovis Leader as far more than an ordinary means of transport. With its enormous capacity and enhanced green operating system, he said, the vessel is expected to set a new benchmark for global seaborne automobile transport and mark an important milestone for the shipping industry.
The ship is capable of cruising at a speed of 19 knots, with a design draft of 10.5 metres. Its 14 decks are built to accommodate a wide array of vehicles, from electric cars and hydrogen-powered vehicles to heavy trucks — a reflection of the evolving demands of global automotive trade as the energy transition accelerates.
Green Technology at the Forefront
Beyond its record-breaking size, the Glovis Leader represents a major step forward in sustainable maritime operations. The vessel is powered by a dual-fuel system using liquefied natural gas (LNG) and conventional fuel, meeting the International Maritime Organization’s Tier III emissions standards. It also incorporates energy-saving technologies, including an optimised hull design, waste heat recovery systems, and shore power capability — allowing the ship to shut down its engines while docked and eliminate local air pollution in port.
A shaft generator developed by a research institute under the CSSC further enables the vessel to generate electricity while underway, reducing fuel consumption during voyages. Industry observers say these features are not merely compliance measures but represent a deliberate industry shift toward lower-carbon global shipping.
China’s Shipbuilding Momentum
The delivery of the Glovis Leader is the latest milestone in what has been a remarkable run for Chinese shipbuilders. Guangzhou Shipyard International has secured more than 40 orders for car carriers and delivered 26 to date. All vessels delivered so far were completed ahead of schedule, with 11 ships delivered in 2025 averaging 151 days early. The company currently holds orders worth approximately 100 billion yuan (about $14.58 billion USD), with overseas contracts accounting for more than 95 percent of the total, and production scheduled through 2030.
The Glovis Leader does not stand alone as evidence of China’s growing dominance in this segment. Just weeks before its delivery, the BYD Shenzhen, with a capacity of 9,200 standard vehicle spaces, completed its maiden export voyage, followed closely by the Anji Ansheng, capable of carrying 9,500 vehicles, which sailed from Shanghai to Europe — both vessels independently built by Chinese shipyards. Each record was broken in rapid succession, with the Glovis Leader now sitting at the top.
Nationally, China remains the world’s largest shipbuilder. Government data shows that the country built 53.69 million deadweight tons of vessels in 2025, accounting for 56.1 percent of global shipbuilding output. In 2025, China’s three major shipbuilding indicators — completed shipbuilding output, new orders, and orders on hand — accounted for the largest share of the global market for the 16th consecutive year.
NIGERIA WATCH: What this means for Nigerian ports, importers, and the auto trade
The arrival of the world’s largest car carrier on the high seas is not a distant headline for Nigeria — it lands squarely in the middle of one of the country’s fastest-growing import categories.
Nigeria’s passenger car imports rose to ₦1.58 trillion in 2025, a 24.64 percent increase year-on-year from ₦1.26 trillion in 2024. The broader transport equipment picture is even more striking: transport equipment and parts imports reached ₦6.54 trillion in 2025, up from ₦4.77 trillion in 2024, with passenger vehicles, industrial machinery, and spare parts making up the bulk of this bill.
Despite this surge in demand, Nigerian consumers are not necessarily getting a better deal. Automotive experts note that the increase in import values reflects the continued impact of foreign exchange volatility, a combination of higher vehicle prices globally and currency-related pressures locally that have significantly raised the cost of importing vehicles. For ordinary Nigerians, the result is vehicles that are increasingly out of reach — pushing more buyers toward the Tokunbo market.
Used vehicles, popularly known as Tokunbo, have become the default option for households and businesses squeezed by high interest rates, volatile foreign exchange markets, and persistent inflation, with Nigeria spending an estimated ₦1.71 trillion on used vehicle imports in 2025. Projections suggest Nigeria’s used vehicle import bill could rise further to about ₦1.85 trillion in 2026, assuming current trends persist.
This is precisely where vessels like the Glovis Leader could begin to make a difference. As ultra-large car carriers increase the volume of vehicles that can be moved per voyage, shipping costs per unit are expected to come down — a shift that could gradually ease the cost burden on Nigerian importers and, eventually, on consumers at the forecourt.
The United States has consistently dominated Nigeria’s vehicle import sourcing, accounting for over 41 percent of total passenger car imports in the first nine months of 2025 — far ahead of South Africa, the UAE, and European sources. The emergence of high-capacity vessels operating trans-Pacific and trans-Atlantic routes could intensify competition among shipping lines serving these corridors, with potential knock-on benefits for Nigerian ports and clearing agents.
On the policy front, Nigeria’s automotive authorities are watching the global fleet closely. The National Automotive Design and Development Council (NADDC) has announced that from 2026, Nigeria will introduce mandatory pre-export certification for used vehicles to curb the importation of unroadworthy and end-of-life vehicles — a policy move that could reshape which vehicles arrive at Tin Can Island and Apapa, and from where.
Under the broader classification of vehicles, aircraft, and related transport equipment, Nigeria’s total imports in this category increased from ₦4.49 trillion in 2024 to ₦5.92 trillion in 2025, representing a 31.8 percent year-on-year rise — a trajectory that shows no signs of slowing. As Nigeria’s appetite for vehicles grows and global shipping capacity expands, the case for routing more car carrier traffic through West African ports strengthens with each record-breaking vessel that enters service.
The Glovis Leader may fly a South Korean flag and carry a Chinese pedigree — but its ripple effects will be felt from Lagos to Port Harcourt.
Waterways News | Maritime Intelligence for Nigeria and Beyond
Oyetola Woos Turkish Investors for Fisheries Sector, Vows to Protect Artisanal Fishers
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News
The Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Dr Adegboyega Oyetola, has thrown Nigeria’s fisheries sector open to Turkish investment, insisting that any fresh capital coming into the industry must strengthen and not sideline the millions of Nigerians who depend on artisanal fishing for a living.
Oyetola made the pledge while receiving a delegation from Turkish fisheries and aquaculture firm CRD Impex, led by the company’s General Manager for Fisheries, Cem Tarhan, at his Abuja office. He told the investors the Federal Government was ready to create an investment-friendly climate for credible local and foreign players willing to bring capital, technology and modern value-chain solutions to the sector, on condition that such investment remains inclusive.
“We welcome investors who can bring capital, technology, expertise and modern value-chain solutions to the sector. However, investment must be inclusive and sustainable. It must complement and empower our artisanal fish producers, not undermine their livelihoods,” the Minister said
He listed inadequate infrastructure, poor access to modern fishing technology, weak cold-chain systems, limited processing and storage capacity, and gaps in market access as the major constraints holding back the sector, framing each as an opening for targeted investment rather than a dead end.
The Turkish team, which included CRD Impex founder Hanefi Cardak and Tetra Underwater Services founder Ersun Buyukgoze, toured key fisheries and aquaculture points around the country to size up the terrain first-hand. Stops included the Kirikiri Lighter Terminal in Lagos, the Ozumba Mbadiwe Fish Market in Lekki, and the Esuk Nsidung Beach Market, a major waterfront seafood hub in Calabar, Cross River State.
The Ministry described the visit as part of a broader push to attract serious investment into Nigeria’s blue economy while keeping the welfare of artisanal fishers central to that growth.
Nigeria Watch
The Turkish courtesy call lands squarely in the pattern this desk has tracked all year: big-ticket investment pledges for Nigeria’s waterways, paired with familiar assurances that the small operator won’t be crowded out. The test, as always, is what happens after the photo-op.
Nigeria’s artisanal fishing communities occupy the same economic space as the informal boat operators represented by WABOTAN and ATBOWATON, river- and creek-dependent Nigerians whose livelihoods rise or fall on decisions made far from the waterfront. The infrastructure gaps Oyetola cited which include, weak cold-chain systems, poor storage and limited market access, all mirror the exact complaints this desk has documented from inland waterway operators for years but modernisation announced from Abuja rarely reache the jetties.
Turkish capital chasing Nigerian fisheries and aquaculture is a genuinely new thread, distinct from the Strait of Hormuz shipping story or the CVFF disbursement saga this desk has followed closely. But the underlying question is the same one that has defined Oyetola’s tenure at the Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy: will “inclusive investment” translate into contracts, cooperative partnerships and cold-chain infrastructure that artisanal operators can actually use or will it, like so many blue-economy pledges before it, stall at the courtesy-visit stage?
Waterways News will be watching for the first concrete CRD Impex commitment — site, timeline, or local partnership — as the marker of whether this one is different.
NPERA, NPA Open Technical Talks on Handover of Inland Dry Port Functions
By Ighoyota Onaibre | Waterways News
The Nigerian Ports Economic Regulatory Agency (NPERA) and the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) have begun formal engagement on transferring inland dry port oversight to NPERA, marking the start of what both agencies describe as a critical phase in operationalising Nigeria’s new port regulatory framework.
At a management-level meeting between the two agencies, officials focused on the technical groundwork for the handover, chiefly how to draw clear lines of responsibility and avoid duplication among the government bodies with a stake in inland dry port administration.
NPERA’s Director-General/CEO, Dr Akutah Pius, framed the transition as flowing directly from the Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Dr Adegboyega Oyetola, whom he credited with steering the process toward the sector’s broader development. Akutah was emphatic that NPERA could not carry out the transfer alone, and said the buy-in of every relevant stakeholder agency would be needed to see it through.
He indicated that the Ministry would stay central to coordinating the process even as specific mandates move to the agencies best placed to execute them. Akutah also pointed to the Minister’s earlier interventions during the NPERA Bill’s passage through the National Assembly, which he said had defused inter-agency friction and set the stage for the cooperation now underway.
Describing the purpose of the meeting, Akutah said it was meant to formally kick off the transfer of inland dry port responsibilities to NPERA in fulfilment of its statutory role as economic regulator of the ports sector. He singled out Section 51 of the NPERA Act as a provision that now needs to be put into practical effect to keep the transition orderly and ensure stakeholder roles are properly aligned.
To manage the process going forward, the NPERA boss proposed setting up a joint committee drawing in NPERA, NPA, the National Inland Waterways Authority (NIWA), and the Federal Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy. He argued that inland dry ports matter well beyond the coastline. They extend maritime sector benefits into Nigeria’s hinterland and reinforce the country’s trade and logistics chain.
Responding on behalf of NPA, Managing Director Dr Abubakar Dantsoho welcomed the move and pledged his agency’s full operational and technical backing throughout the transition. He said the process had started on the right footing, and that NPA would furnish updated data on the current state of inland dry ports to inform further discussions, expressing confidence that continued engagement would help the agencies meet their shared objectives.
NPA’s Executive Director, Engr. Lekan Badmus, also commended NPERA for setting the collaboration in motion, calling the meeting a solid first step toward a smooth integration. He noted the two agencies have now moved into the technical phase of the exercise, with close attention being paid to eliminating overlapping functions.
Closing the meeting, Akutah said the proposed joint committee would reconvene with the Minister to seek further guidance and agree on next steps to keep the transition on track.
Nigeria Watch
This meeting is the first visible test of whether the NPERA Act’s promise of a rationalised port regulatory architecture can survive contact with Nigeria’s crowded agency landscape. Section 51’s transfer of inland dry port functions to NPERA looks straightforward on paper; in practice, it touches NPA’s traditional port administration turf, NIWA’s inland waterways mandate, and the Ministry’s coordinating role all at once, precisely the kind of overlapping jurisdiction that has bedevilled reform efforts elsewhere in the sector, most visibly in the long-running NIWA-LASWA tussle that only the Supreme Court could settle.
The proposed joint committee of NPERA, NPA, NIWA, and the Ministry, is a sensible mechanism, but Waterways News readers who have followed the CVFF disbursement saga know that Nigerian maritime governance has no shortage of well-designed committees whose outputs never quite reach implementation. What will matter is whether Akutah’s “technical phase” produces a binding timeline, not another round of goodwill statements.
For inland dry port operators and the hinterland trade corridors that depend on them, the stakes are practical: unclear jurisdiction between NPA and NPERA has historically meant slower cargo evacuation, duplicated levies, and uncertainty for freight forwarders planning routes away from the congested Lagos ports. If this transition is handled well, it strengthens the case for dry ports as genuine pressure valves for Apapa and Tin Can. If it stalls in inter-agency turf negotiation, it becomes one more entry in the gap between policy pronouncement and delivery that this desk continues to track.
Worth watching: whether Minister Oyetola’s office sets an explicit deadline when the committee reconvenes, and whether NIWA, whose inland waterways mandate intersects with dry port hinterland connectivity, gets more than a seat at the table.
Two More Tankers Struck in Strait of Hormuz as Attack Count Hits Five in a Week
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News
Two more tankers have been hit while transiting the Strait of Hormuz, leaving two seafarers with minor injuries and pushing the number of reported attacks or security incidents against commercial vessels in the waterway to at least five since 16 September.
The UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) centre said an inbound tanker was struck by an unidentified projectile on Monday. Two crew members sustained minor injuries, but the vessel stayed under its own power and continued to its next port, with no environmental impact reported.
Hours later, UKMTO issued a second alert after an outbound LPG tanker reported being struck by debris from unknown projectiles. All crew were reported safe and the vessel also continued its voyage. Authorities are investigating both incidents, and UKMTO has not attributed either attack to a specific actor.
The two strikes build on a Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC) advisory covering three earlier attacks between 16 and 18 September, one of which saw a tanker’s hull breached by a projectile, sparking a fire. JMIC continues to rate the threat level in the strait as “severe,” citing a high likelihood of deliberate hostile action and pointing to a pattern of harassment by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps — drone overflights, surveillance of merchant vessels and VHF hailing, alongside the direct attacks.
Traffic through the chokepoint remains sharply depressed. Only 17 commodity vessels were visibly transiting over the weekend, down from 37 the week before and against a pre-war daily average of roughly 125. That figure excludes vessels sailing with their AIS transponders switched off, and JMIC notes a persistent gap between visible and actual traffic.
Nigeria Watch
For Nigerian maritime stakeholders, the Hormuz crisis is no longer a distant Gulf story. It is a cost line. Every fresh escalation feeds directly into the war-risk insurance premiums and freight rates that Nigerian importers, refiners and shipping agents ultimately absorb, since global tanker and container capacity pulled off the Hormuz route tightens supply elsewhere and pushes rates up across long-haul trades, including those serving West African ports.
The renewed attacks also sharpen the stakes around Nigeria’s push for a stronger voice at the IMO Council table and its broader blue-economy diplomacy under Minister Adegboyega Oyetola. A sustained Gulf disruption is exactly the kind of systemic shock that tests whether Nigeria’s seat translates into influence over how global shipping risk, insurance and rerouting decisions are made, rather than Nigeria simply absorbing the downstream cost.
Locally, the episode is a reminder of the layered nature of “maritime security” as a policy word: the Deep Blue Project and Gulf of Guinea security architecture address piracy and armed robbery close to home, but Nigeria’s ports and shippers remain exposed to security failures thousands of kilometres away in the Gulf.
Waterways News will continue tracking how the Hormuz situation feeds into freight cost pressure at Nigerian ports and NIMASA’s public messaging on the issue.
Oil and Gas7 months agoTantita’s Pipeline Deal: $144m Contract, Rising Output, and the Questions that Deserve Answers
- MARITIME TRADE & SHIPPING7 months ago
World’s Largest Container Ship Sets New Maritime Record with 22,233 TEUs on Single Voyage
- Blue Economy7 months ago
Nigeria’s Coast Guard Bill: A Solution in Search of a Problem?
