Blue Economy
Oyetola Takes Nigeria’s Case for Equity to IMO’s Green Shipping Session in London
Oyetola Takes Nigeria’s Case for Equity to IMO’s Green Shipping Session in London
By Ighoyota Onaibre | Waterways News Reporter | May 5, 2026
Nigeria’s Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Dr. Adegboyega Oyetola, has thrown his weight behind a fair and inclusive global transition to net-zero shipping, insisting that any decarbonization framework that ignores the economic constraints of developing nations is one Africa and the Global South cannot afford to accept.
Speaking at the 84th session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 84) of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in London last week, Oyetola reaffirmed Nigeria’s support for the global push toward zero emissions in international shipping — but drew a firm line: the 2050 net-zero target must align with sustainable development goals and be backed by tangible support for nations still building their economies.
The session, which drew environment and shipping ministers from across the world, has become a focal point for tension between developed maritime nations pushing aggressive decarbonisation timelines and developing economies demanding that equity, not just ambition, shape the rules.
On the sidelines of MEPC 84, Oyetola held high-level bilateral engagements with IMO Secretary-General Arsenio Dominguez and the President of Saudi Arabia’s Transport General Authority, H.E. Fawaz Al Sehali — meetings that underscored Nigeria’s growing weight in global maritime diplomacy.
In his discussions with Dominguez, Oyetola reiterated Nigeria’s commitment to a productive and mutually reinforcing relationship with the IMO, anchored on maritime safety, institutional capacity development, and sustainable blue economy growth. The IMO chief, in turn, expressed appreciation for the warmth shown during his recent visit to Nigeria, noting that his meeting with President Bola Ahmed Tinubu was a strong signal of the country’s seriousness about maritime governance.
L-R: Permanent Secretary, Federal Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy, Mrs. Fatima Mahmood; Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Dr. Adegboyega Oyetola; Secretary-General of International Maritime Organization (IMO), Mr. Arsenio Dominguez; Acting High Commissioner of Nigeria to the UK, Ambassador Mohammed Maidugu, and Director General, Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency, Dr. Dayo Mobereola, during a meeting on the sidelines of the 84th session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee in London last week.
Dominguez also singled out Nigeria’s leadership in tackling maritime insecurity in the Gulf of Guinea, commending the significant reduction in piracy incidents and the improved regional coordination that has followed. His remarks aligned with Nigeria’s recent four-year zero-piracy milestone — a record that has drawn attention from maritime security bodies worldwide.
Talks with the Saudi delegation centred on strengthening bilateral maritime ties and reinforcing mutual support within the IMO framework — a relationship that could carry strategic weight as both nations navigate the politics of the global energy transition.
Broader discussions at MEPC 84 also touched on Nigeria’s expanding role on the IMO Council, port modernisation and digitalisation reforms, and efforts to raise human capital development to international maritime standards.
The minister’s London engagements come at a pivotal moment. Climate activists recently stormed IMO headquarters during the MEPC 84 sessions — a confrontation Waterways News reported — as pressure mounts on the organisation to tighten its green shipping commitments. Nigeria’s position, as articulated by Oyetola, reflects a careful balance: supporting the direction of travel while refusing to let speed override justice.
For a country that handles a significant share of West Africa’s maritime trade and is deepening its blue economy ambitions, how the IMO’s net-zero framework ultimately shapes up could have far-reaching consequences for Nigeria’s shipping costs, port competitiveness, and energy choices for years to come.
High Freight Charges: Importers Save Up to N4m Per Box Routing Cargo Through Cotonou
By Okeoghene Onoriobe | Waterways News
As freight surcharges bite, IMAN raises alarm over accelerating diversion of Nigerian trade traffic to Benin Republic
Nigerian importers are routing consignments away from Apapa and other Lagos ports to the Port of Cotonou in the Republic of Benin, with cost differentials of between N3 million and N4 million per container now driving what stakeholders warn is a structural shift in regional cargo flows.
The Importers Association of Nigeria (IMAN), South West Zone, raised the alarm over the weekend, accusing shipping lines of imposing successive freight rate increases that have rendered cargo clearance through Apapa prohibitively expensive relative to neighbouring port corridors. Acting Chairman of the association, Chief Joseph Ajoku, confirmed the trend, stating that the cost disparity had become too significant for importers to ignore.
“Most times, the cost of clearing in Apapa is so high that we decide to move our cargo to Cotonou. When we compare, we see a difference of about N3 million to N4 million on a single container,” he said.
Ajoku noted that despite repeated engagement with shipping lines, no concession had been reached. Operators, he said, acknowledge stakeholder concerns in meetings but proceed regardless to announce new increments.
“We have attended several meetings. They explain their challenges, but at the end, they still go ahead to announce the increment,” he told newsmen.
The IMAN chairman also raised transparency concerns, alleging that neither shipping companies nor freight forwarders had provided cost templates to justify the price hikes. Importers, he stressed, absorb the cumulative burden of charges imposed across the logistics chain. “All the burden is on the importers. We are the ones at the receiving end,” he said.
Ajoku warned that the sustained diversion of cargo, if left unaddressed, would translate to measurable revenue losses for Nigeria and a further erosion of port competitiveness — a particularly sensitive concern at a time when Lekki Deep Sea Port is still in the early stages of building its cargo base.
Nigeria Watch
The IMAN disclosure crystallises a challenge that Nigerian port authorities and regulators have grappled with for years but have yet to resolve decisively: the cost of doing business through Lagos ports remains structurally higher than competing West African corridors, and freight rate volatility — driven partly by global factors including the Red Sea disruptions and demand shifts on the Asia–West Africa trade lane — is now amplifying that gap in ways that directly influence importer behaviour.
For the Nigerian Shippers’ Council (NSC), whose mandate includes protecting cargo interests and moderating shipping line charges, this is a direct stress test of its regulatory effectiveness. The Council has in recent months taken steps to scrutinise surcharge applications, but the persistence of diversion trends suggests enforcement gaps remain.
The NPA and the Federal Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy will be equally concerned. Every container that transits through Cotonou rather than Apapa or Tin Can Island represents lost terminal revenue, reduced Customs receipts, and diminished throughput statistics — metrics that bear directly on the government’s port reform and concession renewal narrative.
With the Nigeria National Single Window now live and port digitization ongoing, the process argument for Nigerian ports is strengthening. But process improvements mean little if the cost arithmetic continues to favour Cotonou. Addressing the freight rate and port charges question — through stronger NSC intervention, transparent surcharge templates, and dialogue that produces outcomes rather than deferrals — must now be treated as a matter of urgent commercial policy.
Waterways News | Maritime & Blue Economy Reports
Blue Economy
FROM OCEAN TO ENGINE: How Seawater-to-Hydrogen Technology Could Reshape the Future of Maritime Fuel
FROM OCEAN TO ENGINE: How Seawater-to-Hydrogen Technology Could Reshape the Future of Maritime Fuel
Breakthrough electrolysis systems promise to turn the world’s most abundant resource into clean shipping energy — and the implications for global shipping are profound
By Raymond Gold | Co-publisher and Research Reporter| Waterways News, Lagos
For centuries, the sea has been both highway and hazard for the world’s merchant fleets — a vast, untameable resource that ships cross but cannot consume. That relationship may now be on the verge of a fundamental transformation. Engineers and clean-energy researchers are advancing technology that converts seawater directly into hydrogen fuel, potentially allowing vessels to generate their own power from the very ocean beneath their hulls.
The concept, long theorised in academic and engineering circles, has in recent years moved closer to practical application. And for an industry under mounting pressure to decarbonise — shipping accounts for nearly three percent of global greenhouse gas emissions annually — the implications could hardly be more consequential.
What the Technology Does
At its core, seawater-to-hydrogen conversion exploits a deceptively simple chemistry: water, whether fresh or saline, is composed of hydrogen and oxygen atoms that can be separated through electrolysis — the application of electrical current to drive a chemical reaction. In conventional electrolysis, this process uses purified water. The innovation driving current research is the ability to perform this separation efficiently using raw seawater, bypassing the costly and energy-intensive step of desalination.
The challenge is considerable. Seawater is not merely water with dissolved salt; it is a complex mineral solution containing chlorides, sulphates, magnesium, calcium, and dozens of trace elements that aggressively corrode standard electrolysis equipment and compromise catalytic efficiency. Overcoming this requires specialised membrane materials, corrosion-resistant electrode coatings, and advanced catalyst designs capable of selectively extracting hydrogen without triggering the destructive chlorine evolution reactions that plague conventional systems.
Several research institutions — including teams at Stanford University and in China’s leading materials science faculties — have demonstrated functional seawater electrolysis cells in laboratory conditions. The next frontier is ruggedising these systems for the rolling, salt-spray environment of an operational vessel on an ocean crossing.
Once extracted, the hydrogen can be deployed aboard ship in two primary ways: through hydrogen fuel cells, which generate electricity through an electrochemical reaction between hydrogen and oxygen with water as the only byproduct; or through combustion in modified engine systems, including hydrogen-driven steam turbines — a technology that echoes the steam age of maritime history but points firmly toward a zero-emission future.
Why This Matters for Shipping
The global shipping industry moves approximately 90 percent of world trade by volume. It runs almost entirely on heavy fuel oil and marine diesel — fossil fuels that produce sulphur oxides, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, and carbon dioxide at scale. The International Maritime Organisation (IMO) has set a target of net-zero greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping by or around 2050, with intermediate milestones that are already forcing operators and flag states to act.
Alternative fuels — LNG, methanol, ammonia, and green hydrogen — are being explored across the industry. Each carries its own infrastructure challenge. LNG requires cryogenic bunkering terminals. Ammonia is toxic and demands careful handling protocols. Green hydrogen, produced from renewable electricity, depends on an entirely new supply chain that does not yet exist at the scale shipping requires.
Onboard seawater electrolysis sidesteps this infrastructure dependency entirely. A vessel equipped with the technology would, in principle, generate its own fuel continuously during a voyage, powered by renewable energy sources — solar arrays, wind-assisted propulsion, or wave energy convertors — installed on the ship itself. The bunkering port visit, one of the central logistics events in any ocean voyage, could eventually become optional rather than obligatory.
“The vision is genuine maritime energy autonomy,” one marine engineer familiar with current research described it. “You leave port, and the ocean provides.”
The Engineering Obstacles
The path from laboratory demonstration to commercial deployment is rarely short, and seawater electrolysis faces specific engineering obstacles that require resolution before any shipowner will commit capital to a retrofit or newbuild specification.
Foremost among these is the corrosion problem. The electrolytic cell, the filtration system, and all downstream hydrogen handling components must withstand not only the mineral aggressiveness of seawater but also the physical stresses of a marine operating environment — vibration, temperature cycling, and the mechanical demands of continuous operation over voyages measured in weeks. Catalysts and membranes that perform well in controlled conditions may degrade rapidly under these stresses, driving up maintenance costs and reducing reliability.
Filtration is a related challenge. Seawater must be processed through multi-stage filtration to remove particulates, biological matter, and the heaviest dissolved minerals before it reaches the electrolysis cell. The design and maintenance of these filtration trains — compact enough to fit within a vessel’s existing hull footprint without displacing cargo capacity — is itself an active area of engineering research.
Energy efficiency is perhaps the most critical metric. Electrolysis is not thermodynamically free; splitting water requires energy input, and on a vessel where every kilowatt-hour must be generated or stored, the round-trip efficiency of the fuel generation cycle determines whether the system is economically viable. Current state-of-the-art electrolysers operate at between 60 and 80 percent efficiency in ideal conditions. Marine seawater systems are not yet at the upper end of that range.
Scale is the final variable. A research cell producing grams of hydrogen per day is a proof of concept. A commercial system capable of fuelling a Panamax bulker or a large container vessel across the Pacific must produce hydrogen at a rate orders of magnitude higher, consistently and safely, in a package that integrates with existing ship systems and satisfies classification society and flag state safety requirements.
Nigeria Watch: What This Means for West Africa’s Maritime Sector
For Nigerian shipping stakeholders — from the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) to the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA), private shipowners, and the Federal Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy — seawater-to-hydrogen technology warrants close attention even at this early stage of development.
Nigeria’s maritime sector is undergoing a strategic pivot. The revival of a national carrier through partnerships with DP World and AD Ports Group, the deepening of Lekki Deep Sea Port operations, and the Federal
Government’s blue economy agenda all signal ambitions to position Nigeria as a maritime hub rather than merely a transit market. The vessels and fleets that will carry those ambitions — whether coastal tankers, offshore support vessels, or deep-sea cargo ships — will be subject to increasingly strict international emissions standards as they operate in foreign ports and trade lanes.
The European Union’s Emissions Trading System now applies to shipping, and vessels calling at European ports are already paying a carbon price on their voyages. The IMO’s Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) regulations are tightening year on year. Nigerian-flagged vessels, and Nigerian operators trading internationally, cannot remain insulated from these requirements indefinitely.
A technology that enables onboard fuel generation from seawater would be particularly valuable for the offshore oil and gas support sector — a significant component of Nigeria’s maritime economy — where vessels operate far from shore for extended periods and fuel logistics represent a meaningful proportion of operating costs. Patrol and surveillance vessels operated by NIMASA and the Nigerian Navy, which must sustain extended coastal and offshore operations, represent another potential application domain.
The immediate priority for Nigerian maritime regulators and industry associations is awareness and engagement: monitoring the development trajectory of seawater electrolysis systems, participating in IMO technical working groups on alternative fuels, and ensuring that when commercial systems begin to reach the market — an eventuality most analysts place in the 2030s — Nigerian operators and shipyards are positioned to adopt rather than adapt belatedly.
Looking Ahead
The conversion of seawater into hydrogen fuel will not decarbonise global shipping overnight. The technology faces real, unresolved engineering challenges, and the capital cycle of the shipping industry — where vessels are built to operate for 25 years or more — means that transformation is necessarily gradual. But the direction of travel is clear, and the pace of research is accelerating.
What was speculative a decade ago is now demonstrable in laboratory conditions. What is demonstrable today will, with sustained investment and engineering ingenuity, be deployable at sea within the decade. For an industry that has powered itself with fossil fuels since the coal age, the prospect of drawing energy from the ocean itself represents not merely a technical advance but a philosophical one: a shift from consuming the earth’s finite reserves to harvesting the planet’s most inexhaustible resource.
The sea, in other words, may one day fuel the ships that sail in it.
Raymond Gold is Co-publisher and Research Reporter for Waterways News
Waterways News covers the Nigerian and West African maritime sector. For enquiries, advertising, and editorial submissions, visit www.waterwaysnews.ng
Oron Marine Hub: Akwa Ibom’s Bold Bid to Reclaim Its Waterfront Legacy
By Okeoghene Onoriobe, Waterways News Correspondent
There is a certain quiet confidence building along the waterfront of Oron, the ancient coastal town that sits at the southeastern tip of Akwa Ibom State, where the Cross River empties into the Atlantic and where, for generations, fishermen and traders have made their living from the sea. That confidence has a name: the Oron Marine Hub — a sweeping, multi-component marine development project that, when completed, promises to fundamentally transform not just the physical landscape of Oron, but the economic fortunes of an entire coastal corridor in southern Nigeria.
Ongoing construction at the site signals that this is no pipe dream. For a town whose maritime heritage once made it one of the most strategically important waterfront communities in the Niger Delta region, the hub represents something long overdue: a structured, modern infrastructure investment that takes the sea seriously.
More Than a Jetty
It would be a mistake to describe the Oron Marine Hub simply as a jetty project. The development is taking shape as a fully integrated marine terminal and economic complex — one designed to simultaneously address the needs of passengers, cargo operators, fishermen, security agencies, tourists, and traders.
At its core are four modern jetties, purpose-built to accommodate different categories of vessels. Passenger boats, cargo craft, and security and patrol vessels will each have dedicated berths, ending the chaotic informality that has long plagued waterfront operations across the Niger Delta. Alongside these jetties, a central terminal building is under construction to manage the flow of passengers — providing proper ticketing infrastructure, waiting areas, and the kind of organized movement that modern marine transport demands.
For too long, Nigeria’s inland and coastal waterways have operated as an afterthought to road transport, underfunded and underserved. The Oron Marine Hub is a direct challenge to that status quo.
Logistics, Trade, and the Cold Chain
Perhaps the most commercially significant aspect of the project lies in its cargo and trade infrastructure. A network of warehouses and cargo handling facilities is being integrated into the hub, designed to support marine-based trade and logistics along the Akwa Ibom coastline and beyond.
But it is the inclusion of cold storage systems, dry storage units, and fish processing facilities that may prove most transformative for the local economy. Oron sits in one of Nigeria’s most productive fishing zones, yet for decades, post-harvest losses have eaten deeply into the incomes of artisanal fishermen who lack the infrastructure to properly store or process their catch. With these facilities in place, the hub will create a direct value chain — from catch to processing to market — that could significantly increase revenues across the fishing sector, reduce waste, and open new export possibilities.
For fishing communities in Oron, Ibeno, and the broader coastline, this is not a small detail. It is potentially life-changing.
A Recreational and Tourism Offer
The Oron Marine Hub is also being designed with an eye on tourism — a sector that Nigeria’s coastal states have chronically underinvested in, despite possessing some of West Africa’s most scenic and culturally rich waterscapes.
Plans include a recreational waterfront zone, complete with leisure spaces and floating facilities that will offer residents and visitors an experience currently unavailable anywhere along this stretch of the Akwa Ibom coastline. Waterfronts, when properly developed, become magnets for economic activity — drawing restaurants, hospitality businesses, boat hire services, and cultural tourism.
Oron has history on its side. Home to one of Nigeria’s oldest and most significant traditional museums — the Oron Museum — and with a cultural identity deeply tied to water, the town has the raw ingredients for a compelling tourism offer. The Marine Hub gives it the platform.
Built to Last: Shoreline Protection and Infrastructure
Development along Nigeria’s coastline carries inherent risks. Erosion, tidal surge, and the long-term effects of climate change are real concerns for any coastal infrastructure project. The developers of the Oron Marine Hub appear to have accounted for this, incorporating shoreline protection works into the design — a feature that will be critical to the facility’s long-term viability.
Supporting the terminal operations are internal road networks, dedicated parking areas, and security infrastructure — provisions that speak to the operational complexity of running a busy marine hub and the importance of ensuring safety and order within the facility.
Restoring the Corridors
Beyond its physical footprint, the Oron Marine Hub carries significant strategic weight. Analysts and transport observers have long noted that marine routes connecting communities across the Niger Delta and the Gulf of Guinea coastline remain vastly underutilised, despite offering faster and often cheaper alternatives to road travel.
The hub is strategically positioned to restore key marine transport routes — most notably the Oron–Calabar corridor, a historically important waterway link between Akwa Ibom and Cross River States. Reviving this corridor alone would reduce travel times, ease pressure on road infrastructure, and reconnect communities that share deep commercial and cultural ties.
Wider connectivity to waterway routes in Rivers State and beyond is also within the project’s long-term vision, which could eventually reposition this corner of southern Nigeria as a genuine hub in the regional maritime network.
A Gateway City in the Making
When Nigerian leaders and planners speak of harnessing the country’s 853-kilometre coastline and vast inland waterway network, they are often speaking in abstractions. The Oron Marine Hub is concrete — literally and figuratively. It is bricks, steel, jetties, cold rooms, and warehouses rising from the waterfront of a town that has waited a long time for this moment.
When completed, Oron will not merely be a coastal town tucked into the southeastern corner of Akwa Ibom. It will be a functioning marine gateway — a point of departure and arrival for passengers, goods, and vessels; a processing hub for the fishing industry; a leisure and tourism destination; and a commercial node connecting southern Nigeria’s waterways in ways they have not been connected in a generation.
The sea has always defined Oron. With the Marine Hub, Oron is finally building something worthy of it.
NIGERIA WATCH: Tracking the ministries, departments, and agencies with a stake in this story
The Oron Marine Hub sits at the intersection of several federal mandates, making it one of the most regulatory-dense infrastructure projects currently underway in southern Nigeria. Here are the key government bodies whose oversight, policy direction, and funding priorities are directly relevant to this development:
Federal Ministry of Marine & Blue Economy — As the apex ministry for Nigeria’s maritime sector following its establishment by the Tinubu administration, this ministry holds primary federal interest in a project of this nature. The Oron Marine Hub aligns directly with the Blue Economy agenda, which seeks to monetise Nigeria’s coastal and inland water resources. The ministry’s engagement — or absence — in supporting and coordinating this project will be closely watched.
National Inland Waterways Authority (NIWA) — NIWA holds statutory responsibility for the development, maintenance, and regulation of Nigeria’s inland waterways, including the river and creek routes that connect Oron to Calabar, Warri, and Port Harcourt. The restoration of the Oron–Calabar corridor in particular falls squarely within NIWA’s operational mandate, and the agency’s role in dredging, charting, and regulating traffic on these routes will be essential to the hub’s commercial viability.
Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) — To the extent that the Oron Marine Hub handles cargo and commercial vessel traffic, it may fall within the NPA’s licensing and regulatory jurisdiction. The NPA’s framework for recognising and regulating smaller regional terminals and marine hubs will determine how smoothly the facility integrates into Nigeria’s broader port ecosystem.
Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) — NIMASA’s mandate covers vessel registration, seafarer certification, and maritime safety enforcement. With passenger and cargo vessels set to operate from Oron’s new jetties, NIMASA’s safety standards and enforcement presence will be critical to ensuring that the hub operates to international benchmarks and that lives on the water are protected.
Federal Ministry of Agriculture & Food Security — The hub’s fish processing facilities, cold storage systems, and post-harvest infrastructure connect directly to federal agricultural policy, particularly initiatives targeting aquaculture development and the reduction of post-harvest losses in the fisheries sub-sector. Federal support through this ministry could significantly accelerate the fishing industry components of the project.
Federal Ministry of Tourism — With a dedicated recreational waterfront zone forming part of the hub’s design, the Federal Ministry of Tourism has a clear interest in ensuring that the Oron Marine Hub is incorporated into Nigeria’s national tourism development framework and promotional campaigns.
Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NiMet) & Nigerian Hydrological Services Agency (NIHSA) — For a coastal infrastructure project that incorporates shoreline protection works, accurate weather forecasting and hydrological data are non-negotiable. Both agencies have roles to play in providing the environmental intelligence needed to protect the hub’s long-term structural integrity against tidal and climate risks.
Akwa Ibom State Government — While not a federal body, the state government is the most proximate authority driving and financing this project. Its relationship with federal agencies — particularly NIWA, NIMASA, and the Ministry of Marine & Blue Economy — will largely determine how quickly approvals, corridor licensing, and regulatory clearances are obtained.
Waterways News will continue to monitor federal agency engagement with the Oron Marine Hub project. Relevant ministries and agencies are invited to share updates, policy positions, and timelines with our editorial team.
Send tips and reports to the Waterways News editorial desk at www.waterwaysnews.ng
-
Oil and Gas2 months agoTantita’s Pipeline Deal: $144m Contract, Rising Output, and the Questions that Deserve Answers
-
Blue Economy3 months agoNigeria’s Coast Guard Bill: A Solution in Search of a Problem?
-
MARITIME TRADE & SHIPPING2 months agoWorld’s Largest Container Ship Sets New Maritime Record with 22,233 TEUs on Single Voyage